O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 111

ORDER Re 109 Defendant's Corrective Notices. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/18/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

9

Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S
CORRECTIVE NOTICES

v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C-13-3826 EMC

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

12

Defendants.
___________________________________/

(Docket No. 109)

13
14
15
16
17

Before the Court are Uber’s revised proposed corrective notices and licensing agreement.
Docket No. 109. In response to Uber’s requests, the Court orders as follows:
(1)

18
19

Uber shall send the “advance notice” as it initially proposed. Drivers are more likely
to take note of the changes to the licensing agreement if a notice is sent in advance.

(2)

Uber may exclude Plaintiffs’ counsel’s contact information from the licensing

20

agreement (but shall include it in the “advance notice” and the second notice that

21

accompanies the licensing agreement).

22
23
24

The Court has made corrections (highlighted) to the revised proposed corrective notices and
licensing agreement. Uber shall issue the documents as corrected.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: June 18, 2014
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge