O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 111

ORDER Re 109 Defendant's Corrective Notices. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/18/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S CORRECTIVE NOTICES v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C-13-3826 EMC UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 12 Defendants. ___________________________________/ (Docket No. 109) 13 14 15 16 17 Before the Court are Uber’s revised proposed corrective notices and licensing agreement. Docket No. 109. In response to Uber’s requests, the Court orders as follows: (1) 18 19 Uber shall send the “advance notice” as it initially proposed. Drivers are more likely to take note of the changes to the licensing agreement if a notice is sent in advance. (2) Uber may exclude Plaintiffs’ counsel’s contact information from the licensing 20 agreement (but shall include it in the “advance notice” and the second notice that 21 accompanies the licensing agreement). 22 23 24 The Court has made corrections (highlighted) to the revised proposed corrective notices and licensing agreement. Uber shall issue the documents as corrected. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 18, 2014 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?