O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
ORDER Re 109 Defendant's Corrective Notices. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/18/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,
ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-13-3826 EMC
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
(Docket No. 109)
Before the Court are Uber’s revised proposed corrective notices and licensing agreement.
Docket No. 109. In response to Uber’s requests, the Court orders as follows:
Uber shall send the “advance notice” as it initially proposed. Drivers are more likely
to take note of the changes to the licensing agreement if a notice is sent in advance.
Uber may exclude Plaintiffs’ counsel’s contact information from the licensing
agreement (but shall include it in the “advance notice” and the second notice that
accompanies the licensing agreement).
The Court has made corrections (highlighted) to the revised proposed corrective notices and
licensing agreement. Uber shall issue the documents as corrected.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 18, 2014
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?