Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc.

Filing 59

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Podfitness, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Veverka, Charles) (Filed on 9/19/2007)

Download PDF
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc. Doc. 59 Case 4:06-cv-05805-SBA Document 59 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Larry R. Laycock (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) CharlesJ. Veverka (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Robert E. Aycock (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Mark W. Ford (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WORKMAN NYDEGGER I 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-9800 Facsimile: (801) 328-1707 Email: llaycock@wnlaw.com William B. Farmer (State Bar No. 46694) Jacob Alpren (State Bar No. 235713) COLLETTE RICKSON ARMER& O'NEILL LLP E F 235 Pine Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 788-4646 Facsimile: (415) 788-6929 Email: wfarmer@collette.com Attorneys for Defendant POD FITNESS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION APPLE, INe., Plaintiff, v. PODFITNESS, INC., and DOES 1-100, inclusive Defendants. Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW OF WORKMAN NYDEGGER AND COLLETTE ERICKSON FARMER & O'NEILL Civil Action No. 4:06-cv-05805 SBA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Local Rule 11-5, Larry R. Laycock, Charles J. Veverka, Robert E. Aycock, Brett 1. Johnson and Mark W. Ford of WORKMAN YDEGGER, nd William B. Farmer and Jacob N a Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:06-cv-05805-SBA Document 59 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 Alpren of COLLETTE RICKSON ARMER& O'NEILL (collectively "Counsel"), counsel for E F Defendant Podfitness, Inc. ("Podfitness") hereby notify the parties of their intent to withdraw as attorneys of record for Podfitness, and move the Court to permit withdrawal. The following are grounds for this notice and motion: 1. Irreconcilable differences have developed between Counsel and Podfitness, which differences make it impossible for Counsel to effectively represent Podfitness in this action. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 5. 4. 2. Podfitness has full-time in-house counsel, Mr. Steve Hutchinson, Esq., that has actively participated in this action with Counsel and has interfaced directly with counsel for Plaintiff Apple, Inc. ("Apple"). 3. Apple recently added claims in the present action through its First Amended Complaint, filed on August 1, 2007. Podfitness responded to the First Amended Complaint and added counterclaims through its Answer to First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed on August 31, 2007. The parties have completed much of the written discovery necessary in this case: -Podfitness has responded to Apple's First Sets ofInterrogatories, Requests for Admissions and Requests for Production. Podfitness has also produced over 5000 pages of documents and things. -Apple has responded to Defendant's First Sets ofInterrogatories and Requests for Production and has produced approximately 290,000 pages of documents and things. The great majority of Apple's production occurred throughout July of2007. Approximately three months remain for the parties to complete fact discovery, with the fact discovery cutoff presently set for December 14, 2007. 7. 22 23 24 25 26 27 Approximately six months remain for the parties to complete expert discovery, with the expert discovery cutoff presently set for March 14, 2008. 2 NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW Case No. C 06-5805 SBA Case 4:06-cv-05805-SBA Document 59 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 3 of 4 1 2 8. Counsel submits that ample time remains for Podfitness to either engage substitute outside counselor proceed through representation by its in-house counsel without prejudice to Podfitness. 3 4 5 6 9. Counsel has provided prior notice to Podfitness of the present motion. Apple will receive notice through contemporaneous service of this motion. 10. Papers may continue to be served on WORKMAN YDEGGER ntil either Mr. N u Hutchinson or other substitute counsel file their Notice(s) of Appearance or Podfitness files a Notice to Appear Pro Se. WORKMAN YDEGGER ill forward N w all such papers to Podfitness until such time as Notice(s) of Appearance are filed behalf of Podfitness. 7 8 9 loon 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Based on the foregoing, Counsel respectfully requests that the Court grant them leave to withdraw, effective immediately. DATED: September 18, 2007. A proposed form of order is simultaneously filed herewith. Respectfully submitted, WORKMAN NYDEGGER I 18 19 20 21 /s/ Charles J. Veverka 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-9800 COLLETTE RICKSON ARMER O'NEILL LLP E F & 235 Pine Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 788-4646 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterc1aimant Podfitness, Inc. 22 23 24 25 26 27 3 NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW Case No. C 06-5805 SBA Case 4:06-cv-05805-SBA Document 59 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 PROOF OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 18, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the following: Abrams@fr.com; iacob<!lpren@quinnemanuel.com; raycock@hvnlaYJ.com; wfanner(q)collette. com; rlawrence@collette.com; llaycock(cU,wnlaw.com; ilewis@wnlaw.com; martens@lr.com; mic1can(cU,fr.com;cvcverka(iV,wnlaw.com and served Podfitness' in-house counsel separately at shutchinson@podfitness.com. 5 6 7 8 9 DATED September 18, 2007. WORI(MANI NYDEGGER 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Isl Charles J. Veverka Larry R. Laycock Charles J. Veverka Robert A. Aycock MarkW. Ford 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-9800 William S. Farmer Jacob Alpren COLLETTE RICKSON ARMER& 0 'NEILL LLP E F 235 Pine Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 788-4646 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Podfitness, Inc. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 4 NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW Case No. C 06-5805 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?