Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc.
Filing
59
MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Podfitness, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Veverka, Charles) (Filed on 9/19/2007)
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc.
Doc. 59 Att. 1
Case 4:06-cv-05805-SBA
Document 59-2
Filed 09/19/2007
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Larry R. Laycock (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Charles J. Veverka (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Robert E. Aycock (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Mark W. Ford (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WORKMAN!NYDEGGER 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-9800 Facsimile: (801) 328-1707 Email: llaycock@wnlaw.com William B. Farmer (State Bar No. 46694) Jacob Alpren (State Bar No. 235713) COLLETTE RICKSON ARMER& O'NEILL LLP E F 235 Pine Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 788-4646 Facsimile: (415) 788-6929 Email: wfarmer@collette.com Attorneys for Defendant PODFITNESS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION APPLE, INC., Plaintiff, v. PODFITNESS, INC., and DOES 1-100, inclusive Defendants. Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAW OF WORKMAN NYDEGGER AND COLLETTE ERICKSON FARMER & O'NEILL Civil Action No. 4:06-cv-05805 SBA
22
23 24 25 26 27
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion of WORKMANNYDEGGER and COLLETTEERICKSONFARMER & O'NEILL (collectively "Counsel") for leave to withdraw as
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 4:06-cv-05805-SBA
Document 59-2
Filed 09/19/2007
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
counsel for Defendant Podfitness, Inc. ("Podfitness").
Based upon the submissions of Counsel
and status of the present action, Podfitness has sufficient time to either engage substitute counsel or proceed through representation of its in-house counsel, Mr. Steve Hutchinson, Esq.
Therefore, being fully advised in the premises and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counsel's Motion for Leave to Withdraw is GRANTED as follows: 1. Larry R. Laycock, Charles J. Veverka, Robert E. Aycock, Brett 1. Johnson and Mark W. Ford of WORKMAN YDEGGER, nd William B. Farmer and Jacob Alpren of COLLETTE N a ERICKSON ARMER O'NEILL are granted leave to withdraw as counsel for Podfitness. F & 2. All papers shall be served on Workman Nydegger until an Appearance of Counsel for Podfitness is filed by either substitute outside counsel, Podfitness' in-house counselor Podfitness files a Notice to Appear Pro Se. Workman Nydegger is ordered to forward all such papers to Podfitness until Notice(s) of Appearance are filed on behalf of Pod fitness.
IT IS SO ORDERED this _day
of
, 2007. BY THE COURT:
SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23 24 25 26 27 2
ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAW
Case No. C 06-5805 SBA
Case 4:06-cv-05805-SBA
Document 59-2
Filed 09/19/2007
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9
PROOF OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 19, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CMIECF system which sent notification of such filing to the following: Abr<.!!]Js(a)JrQQ1; j acobalprenViJ,quinnemanue1.cQm; .@ycoc:lsl?jlwnl0:w.com; C. wfarmer(({),collette.com; rlawrence@collette.com; llaycock(a!wnlaw. com; ilewis(a~wl1law. om; c martens@fr.com; rnicIcan@fi.com; cvcvcrka(fV,wnIaw.com and served Podfitness' in-house counsel separately at shutchinson@podfitness.com.
DATED September 19,2007. VVO~NINYDEGGER
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Isl Charles J. Veverka
Larry R. Laycock Charles J. Veverka Robert A. Aycock Mark VV.Ford 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-9800
VVilliam S. Farmer Jacob Alpren COLLETTE RICKSON ARMER& 0 'NEILL LLP E F 235 Pine Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 788-4646 Attorneys for Defendant and CountercIaimant Podfitness, Inc.
20
21
22
23 24 25
26 27
3
ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAW
Case No. C 06-5805 SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?