Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 124

Declaration of Nima Kelly in Support of 119 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Appendix in Support filed byGoDaddy.com, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Greg Schwimer ISO Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to Seal, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit A Part 1 to Proposed Order, # 4 Exhibit A Part 2 to Proposed Order, # 5 Exhibit A Part 3 to Proposed Order, # 6 Exhibit A Part 4 to Proposed Order, # 7 Exhibit A Part 5 to Proposed Order, # 8 Exhibit A Part 6 to Proposed Order, # 9 Exhibit A Part 7 to Proposed Order)(Related document(s) 119 ) (Slafsky, John) (Filed on 11/9/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

JOHN L. SLAFSKY, State Bar No. 195513
DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952
HOLLIS BETH HIRE, State Bar No. 203651
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
GODADDY.COM, INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,

13

Plaintiff,

14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

vs.

15

GODADDY.COM, INC.,

16

Defendant.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

GODADDY.COM, INC.,
Counterclaimant,
vs.
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
Counterclaim Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART
MOTION TO SEAL
Case No. 4:09-cv-05939-PJH

-1-

CASE NO.: 09-CV-5939 PJH
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN
PART PLAINTIFF’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
SEAL

Date:
Time:
Courtroom:

December 7, 2011
9:00 a.m.
3

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

1

The Court has considered the papers and evidence presented in connection with Plaintiff’s

2

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (“Motion to Seal”) filed in connection with its Motion

3

for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court has determined that, in light of the declarations of

4

Nima Kelly and Greg Schwimer filed by GoDaddy.com, Inc. (“Go Daddy”) in support of

5

Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal, compelling reasons exist for sealing (1) Go Daddy’s standard operating

6

procedure for dealing with trademark claims (“SOP”) found at pages 165-173 of Plaintiff’s

7

appendix in support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Appendix”), and (2) portions

8

of the transcript of the October 19, 2011 deposition of Jeff Munson found on page 11 at lines 4-10

9

and 14-16, page 13 at lines 9-13, page 14 at lines 7-24, page 16 at lines 1-25, page 17 at lines 1-4,

10

page 19 at lines 6-9 and 22-24, page 22 at lines 6-8, page 23 at lines 3-7and 17-25, and all of

11

pages 24-26, which are located within pages 187-190 of the Appendix (the “Munson excerpts”).

12

The Court notes that many of the Munson excerpts were not cited in Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial

13

Summary Judgment.

14

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN

15

PART. This Court finds compelling reasons exist for sealing: (1) the SOP found at pages 165-173

16

of the Appendix and (2) portions of the transcript of the October 19, 2011 deposition of Jeff

17

Munson found on page 11 at lines 4-10 and 14-16, page 13 at lines 9-13, page 14 at lines 7-24,

18

page 16 at lines 1-25, page 17 at lines 1-4, page 19 at lines 6-9 and 22-24, page 22 at lines 6-8,

19

page 23 at lines 3-7and 17-25, and all of pages 24-26 which are located within pages 187-190 of

20

the Appendix. The clerk is hereby instructed, consistent with this Order, to enter in the record the

21

public version of Plaintiff’s appendix in support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

22

which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

23
24

Dated: ___________________

___________________________

25

Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Judge

26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART
MOTION TO SEAL
Case No. 4:09-cv-05939-PJH

-2-