Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.
Filing
124
Declaration of Nima Kelly in Support of 119 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Appendix in Support filed byGoDaddy.com, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Greg Schwimer ISO Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to Seal, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit A Part 1 to Proposed Order, # 4 Exhibit A Part 2 to Proposed Order, # 5 Exhibit A Part 3 to Proposed Order, # 6 Exhibit A Part 4 to Proposed Order, # 7 Exhibit A Part 5 to Proposed Order, # 8 Exhibit A Part 6 to Proposed Order, # 9 Exhibit A Part 7 to Proposed Order)(Related document(s) 119 ) (Slafsky, John) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
EXHIBIT A
1 PERRY R. CLARK, State Bar No. 197101
LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK
2 825 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
3 Telephone: (650) 248-5817
Facsimile: (650) 248-5816
4 perry@perryclarklaw.com
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS)
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13 PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD
(PETRONAS),
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
vs.
17 GODADDY.COM, INC.,
18
19
20
21
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO: 09-CV-5939 PJH
Noticed Hearing Date: December 7,
2011
Noticed Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m.
PUBLIC VERSION
PLAINTIFF’S APPENDIX
OF FED. R. CIV. P. 56(C)(1)(A) MATERIALS
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S APPENDIX
OF FED. R. CIV. P. 56(C)(1)(A) MATERIALS
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
1
Plaintiff Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) submits this Appendix of Fed. R. Civ. P.
2
56(c)(1)(A) Materials In Support Of Motion For Partial Summary Judgment to facilitate the
3
placement of materials into the record that support its factual positions. Plaintiff is submitting
4
this appendix voluntarily as contemplated by the Committee Notes accompanying the 2010
5
Amendment to Fed. R. Civ. R. Civ. P. 56, Subdivision (c)(1)(A), and to make use of the
6
suggestion therein that “[p]ointing to a specific location in an appendix satisfies the citation
7
requirement” of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).
8
9
10
The each page in this appendix has been number from APP001 to APP204 and Petronas
cites to specific location in this appendix by use of these page numbers.
Dated: November 2, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK
11
12
13
14
By:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1PLAINTIFF’S APPENDIX
OF FED. R. CIV. P. 56(C)(1)(A) MATERIALS
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
/s/ Perry R. Clark
.
Perry R. Clark
Attorney for Plaintiff
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD
(PETRONAS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD
(PETRONAS),
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 09-CV-5939PJH
vs.
GODADDY.COM, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________/
::: CONFIDENTIAL :::
30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF RONALD HERTZ
DATE:
Thursday, October 13, 2011
TIME:
12:05 p.m.
LOCATION:
BALLARD SPAHR, LLP
1 East Washington Street, Suite 2300
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
REPORTED BY: JANICE HARRINGTON, RPR, CRR, CLR
AZ Certified Court Reporter No. 50844
Registered Professional Reporter
Certified Realtime Reporter
Certified LiveNote Reporter
MBreporting
111 Deerwood Road, Suite 200
San Ramon, California 94583
APP001
Page 2
1
::: APPEARANCES :::
2
3
4
5
6
FOR PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS) PLAINTIFF:
Law Offices of Perry R. Clark
By: Perry R. Clark, Attorney At Law
825 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
(650) 248-5817
perry@perryclarklaw.com
7
8
9
10
11
12
FOR GODADDY.COM, INC., DEFENDANT:
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
By: Tonia Ouellette Klausner,
Attorney At Law
1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
New York, New York 10019-6022
(212) 497-7706
tklausner@wsgr.com
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
APP002
Page 3
1
::: INDEX OF EXAMINATIONS :::
2
EXAMINATION BY:
PAGE
3
MR. CLARK
5, 14
4
MS. KLAUSNER
14
5
6
7
8
::: INDEX OF REQUESTS :::
9
PAGE
LINE
REQUEST
10
11
None
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
APP003
Page 4
1
::: INDEX OF EXHIBITS :::
2
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
PAGE
3
30
Document, Bates No. GD-00251-002607
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
APP004
11
Page 5
1
RONALD HERTZ
2
being duly sworn by the Certified Shorthand Reporter
3
to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
4
the truth, testified as follows:
5
EXAMINATION BY MR. CLARK
6
Q.
Okay.
Good afternoon.
My name is Perry
7
Clark.
I'm a lawyer for the plaintiff in this case,
8
Petroliam Nasional Berhad who I will refer to as
9
Petronas.
10
MS. KLAUSNER:
And I'm Tonia Klausner.
11
I'm here on behalf of Go Daddy.
12
BY MR. CLARK:
13
14
Q.
Okay.
Could you please state your name
for the record, please?
15
A.
Ronald Hertz.
16
Q.
Okay.
17
A.
I do.
18
Q.
What is your current job title?
19
A.
Vice President and Corporate Controller.
20
Q.
How long have you had that title?
21
A.
Approximately two years.
22
Q.
And were you working for Go Daddy before
23
And you work for Go Daddy?
you were Vice President?
24
A.
I was.
25
Q.
And what was your job title then?
APP005
Page 6
1
A.
Corporate Controller.
2
Q.
How long have you worked for Go Daddy?
3
A.
Little over nine years.
4
Q.
All right.
5
in front of you.
6
at Exhibit 1, please.
7
there's a numbered paragraph 18 towards the top of
8
that page.
So we have a pile of exhibits
Could you go ahead and take a look
If you could turn to page 9,
Do you see paragraph 18?
9
A.
Yes.
10
Q.
It says, "Go Daddy's business operations
11
and financial information to which Go Daddy refers in
12
its initial disclosure is dated July 15, 2010."
13
you see that?
14
A.
Yes.
15
Q.
Do
And do you understand you have been
16
designated as Go Daddy's representative to testify on
17
that topic?
18
A.
Yes.
19
Q.
Okay.
20
general -- okay.
21
you might be giving a deposition in this case?
So can you tell me I guess in
When were you first informed that
22
A.
Approximately two weeks ago.
23
Q.
Okay.
24
A.
Nima Kelly.
25
Q.
Okay.
And who was it?
Who informed you?
And what have you done to prepare
APP006
Page 7
1
for your deposition?
2
MS. KLAUSNER:
And I'll caution the
3
witness not to disclose any conversations you might
4
have had with attorneys.
5
THE WITNESS:
I met with counsel and
6
reviewed a couple of documents.
7
BY MR. CLARK:
8
Q.
When did you meet with counsel?
9
A.
With outside counsel yesterday.
10
Q.
Okay.
11
Did you do anything else to
prepare for your deposition?
12
A.
I did not.
13
Q.
Okay.
You said you reviewed some
14
documents.
Did you review all the documents that you
15
reviewed during your meeting with outside counsel?
16
A.
No, I did not.
17
Q.
Okay.
You reviewed some documents
18
outside of the time that you met with your counsel,
19
correct?
20
A.
That is correct.
21
Q.
All right.
22
23
24
25
Do you recall what documents
you reviewed outside of your meeting with counsel?
A.
Yes.
I reviewed the Registrar-Registry
Agreement with VeriSign.
Q.
Any others?
APP007
Page 12
1
A.
To the best of my knowledge, yes.
2
Q.
Do you know if this Registry-Registrar
3
relates in any way to Go Daddy's domain name
4
forwarding service?
5
MS. KLAUSNER:
6
THE WITNESS:
Object to the form.
Can you explain what you
7
mean by "relates in any way"?
8
BY MR. CLARK:
9
Q.
Does Go Daddy have any obligations
10
arising from the .NET Registry-Registrar that relate
11
to the conduct of its domain name forwarding service?
12
MS. KLAUSNER:
13
THE WITNESS:
14
Can you restate the
question please?
15
Object to the form.
BY MR. CLARK:
16
Q.
Sure.
I'm just getting at, does the .NET
17
Registry-Registrar Agreement govern any of Go Daddy's
18
conduct with respect to providing its domain name
19
forwarding service to Go Daddy's customers?
20
21
22
A.
I'm not sure what you mean by governing
its conduct.
Q.
So can you explain in general what Go
23
Daddy's obligations are under the .NET
24
Registrar-Registry Agreement?
25
A.
My understanding of the agreement is it
APP008
Page 13
1
sets out the guidelines between Go Daddy and VeriSign
2
in registering .NET domain names.
3
Q.
Does Go Daddy's domain name forwarding
4
service relate to the registration of .NET domain
5
names?
6
A.
I'm not sure I understand the question.
7
Q.
Is Go Daddy's domain name forwarding
8
service part of its activity with respect to
9
registering .NET domain names?
10
A.
I don't believe the forwarding service
11
relates at all to the registration of the domain
12
name.
13
Q.
Okay.
Just changing gears a little bit,
14
topic 20 relates to an insurance agreement, and you
15
mentioned an E and O insurance agreement.
16
agreement made in connection with the Hiscox
17
insurance agency?
18
A.
Hiscox is the insurance provider.
19
Q.
Okay.
20
Is that an
Is that agreement still in effect?
Or I'm sorry, is that policy still in effect?
21
A.
It is not.
22
Q.
Has Go Daddy made a claim related to this
23
case under any insurance policy other than the Hiscox
24
insurance policy?
25
A.
Not that I'm aware of.
APP009
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JOHN L. SLAFSKY, State Bar No. 195513
DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952
HOLLIS BETH HIRE, State Bar No. 203651
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
jslafsky@wsgr.com
dlansky@wsgr.com
hhire@wsgr.com
Attorneys for Defendant / Counterclaimant
GODADDY.COM, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
GODADDY.COM, INC.,
16
Defendant.
17
18
GODADDY.COM, INC.,
19
20
21
22
Counterclaimant,
vs.
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
Counterclaim Defendant.
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 09-CV-5939 PJH
GO DADDY’S RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S THIRD SET OF
INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 21-25)
24
25
26
27
28
GO DADDY’S RESPONSE TO THIRD
SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 21-25)
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
4534112_2.DOCX
APP010
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33, Defendant / Counterclaimant
2
GoDaddy.com, Inc. (“Go Daddy”), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby responds to
3
the Third Set of Interrogatories (“Requests”) by Plaintiff / Counterclaim Defendant Petroliam
4
Nasional Berhad (“Plaintiff” or “Petronas”).
5
No admissions of any nature whatsoever are implied by, or should be inferred from, these
6
Responses. Each of these Responses is based on Go Daddy’s understanding of each individual
7
interrogatory and, to the extent that Plaintiff asserts an interpretation of any interrogatory that is
8
inconsistent with that understanding, Go Daddy reserves the right to supplement these
9
Responses.
10
11
GENERAL OBJECTIONS
Go Daddy makes the following general objections, whether or not separately set forth in
12
response to each interrogatory. Although Go Daddy may repeat some of these general objections
13
in a specific response because they are particularly applicable, such specific citations are not to
14
be construed as a waiver of any other general objections applicable to the interrogatory. These
15
general objections are incorporated in each response to each interrogatory as if fully set forth in
16
each of the individual responses below.
17
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 1:
18
Go Daddy objects to the Requests, and to each and every individual interrogatory, to the
19
extent they seek information protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine,
20
and/or any other applicable privilege or protection. Without prejudice to this objection, Go Daddy
21
will provide responses to the Requests to the extent that such responses do not waive such
22
privileges or protections.
23
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 2:
24
All responses to the Requests are based upon the information presently known to Go
25
Daddy and are given without prejudice to Go Daddy’s right to adduce evidence discovered or
26
analyzed subsequent to the date of these responses. Go Daddy expressly reserves the right to
27
revise and supplement its responses to the Requests.
28
GO DADDY’S RESPONSE TO THIRD
SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 21-25)
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
~2~
APP011
4534112_2.DOCX
1
2
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 3:
Go Daddy objects to the Requests, and to each and every individual interrogatory, to the
3
extent they seek information outside of Go Daddy’s possession, custody, or control, on the
4
grounds that any such request is overbroad and unduly burdensome, seeks to impose discovery
5
obligations in excess of those imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and would subject
6
Go Daddy to unreasonable annoyance, burden, and expense.
7
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 4:
8
9
Go Daddy objects to the Requests, and to each and every individual interrogatory, as
unduly burdensome, oppressive and in violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to the
10
extent they purport to require Go Daddy to respond on behalf of, or conduct any inquiry or
11
investigation with respect to, any party other than Go Daddy. Go Daddy will only answer the
12
request on its own behalf.
13
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 5:
14
Go Daddy objects to the Requests to the extent that they seek information that is neither
15
relevant, admissible, nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence,
16
and to the extent that they require Go Daddy to make legal conclusions.
17
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 6:
18
Go Daddy objects to the Requests, and to each and every individual interrogatory, as
19
overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent they do not include a limitation or proposed
20
definition of a relevant time period.
21
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 7:
22
Go Daddy objects to the Requests, and to each and every individual interrogatory, to the
23
extent they are not consistent with or do not meet the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil
24
Procedure. Go Daddy’s agreement to endeavor to answer the Requests, and each and every
25
individual interrogatory, is not, and should not be construed as, Go Daddy’s waiver of its right to
26
object to these or any other requests as violative of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
27
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 8:
28
Go Daddy objects to the Requests, and to each and every individual interrogatory
GO DADDY’S RESPONSE TO THIRD
SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 21-25)
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
~3~
APP012
4534112_2.DOCX
1
contained therein, to the extent they seek information related to experts. Go Daddy will provide
2
information related to experts consistent with the Court’s schedule for expert discovery.
3
GENERAL OBJECTION NO. 9:
4
Go Daddy specifically reserves all objections as to the competence, relevancy, materiality,
5
and admissibility of its documents and interrogatory responses or the subject matter thereof, and
6
all rights to object on any ground to the use of any document or interrogatory response, or the
7
subject matter thereof, in any subsequent proceeding, including without limitation the trial of this
8
or any action. Go Daddy’s Responses are made expressly subject to, and without in any manner
9
waiving, any and all objections to the competency, relevance, materiality and/or admissibility of
10
any of the matters encompassed in the following Responses.
11
SPECIFIC RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS
12
Go Daddy expressly incorporates the above General Objections as though set forth fully in
13
response to each of the following individual interrogatories and, to the extent they are not raised in
14
any particular response, Go Daddy does not waive those objections. An answer to an
15
interrogatory shall not be deemed a waiver of any applicable specific or general objection.
16
Likewise, an answer to an interrogatory shall not be deemed an admission of any assertions
17
contained in that interrogatory.
18
INTERROGATORY NO. 21:
19
Please describe in detail the services provided by GoDaddy related to the disputed
20
domain names, including technical aspects of routing/forwarding the disputed domain names.
21
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 21:
22
In addition to the General Objections, Go Daddy objects to this interrogatory on the
23
grounds that it is cumulative, overbroad and harassing, vague, ambiguous and unintelligible,
24
particularly with respect to the phrase “services provided by GoDaddy related to the disputed
25
domain names...”.
26
Subject to and without waving the foregoing objections, Go Daddy responds as follows:
27
Since April 1, 2007, Go Daddy has served as the registrar for the domain names
28
“petronastower.net” and “petronastowers.net.” As part of its registrar services, Go Daddy
GO DADDY’S RESPONSE TO THIRD
SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 21-25)
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
~4~
APP013
4534112_2.DOCX
1
provided routing services, pointing the domain names to the name servers or websites of the
2
registrant’s choosing. At times, Go Daddy routed or “forwarded” the domain names to a pre-
3
existing website, automatically at the request of the domain name registrant. Further information
4
concerning the services provided by Go Daddy to the domain names can be found at GD-
5
000293; GD-000298; GD-000361—GD-000362; GD-000366; GD-000384—GD-000392; GD-
6
000560—GD-000563 of Go Daddy’s production. Go Daddy transferred the petronastower.net
7
domain name to counsel for Petronas, Perry Clark, on May 18, 2010. Go Daddy transferred the
8
petronastowers.net domain name to Clark on August 30, 2010. For additional details regarding
9
the technical aspects of the services provided, see the Expert Report of Michael Palage, served
10
on Petronas on October 3, 2011.
11
INTERROGATORY NO. 22:
12
Please describe in detail the information GoDaddy has in its possession regarding David
13
Daash and the “registration and use of the disputed domain names; hosting of destination
14
website; destination website content,” to which GoDaddy refers in its supplemental initial
15
disclosures dated June 29, 2011, including when GoDaddy became aware that David Daash was
16
the registrant of one or both of the disputed domain names and any changes to the Whois record
17
related thereto.
18
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 22:
19
Subject to and without waving the foregoing objections, Go Daddy responds as follows:
20
The contact audit history possessed by Go Daddy for domain name “petronastower.net”
21
indicates that at the time petronastower.net was transferred to Go Daddy on April 1, 2007, Heiko
22
Schoenekess was the registrant. The registrant of petronastower.net was changed by the account
23
holder to David Daash on April 1, 2007. On July 2, 2009 the registrant was changed by the
24
account holder back to Heiko Schoenekess. On December 12, 2009, the registrant of
25
“petronastower.net” was changed by the account holder to David Daash, and again back to Heiko
26
Schoenekess on the very same date. The contact audit history relating to David Daash and
27
petronastower.net, including Daash’s listed registrant contact information, can be found at GD-
28
000151—GD-000152 of Go Daddy’s production. A copy of the results of a Whois search for
GO DADDY’S RESPONSE TO THIRD
SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 21-25)
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
~5~
APP014
4534112_2.DOCX
1
petronastower.net from December 21, 2009—listing David Daash as the registrant—can also be
2
found at GD-000618—GD-000619 of Go Daddy’s production.
3
The contact audit history possessed by Go Daddy for domain name “petronastowers.net”
4
indicates that at the time petronastowers.net was transferred to Go Daddy on April 1, 2007,
5
Heiko Schoenekess was the registrant. The registrant of petronastowers.net was changed by the
6
account holder to David Daash on April 1, 2007. On July 2, 2009 the registrant was changed by
7
the account holder back to Heiko Schoenekess. The contact audit history relating to David
8
Daash and petronastowers.net, including Daash’s listed registrant contact information, can be
9
found at GD-000109—GD-000110 of Go Daddy’s production.
10
11
INTERROGATORY NO. 23:
Please describe in detail the information GoDaddy has in its possession regarding Bruno
12
Zehnder and the “hosting of destination website and destination website content” to which
13
GoDaddy refers in its supplemental initial disclosures dated June 29, 2011.
14
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 23:
15
Subject to and without waving the foregoing objections, Go Daddy responds as follows:
16
On December 21, 2009, a search was performed in the Whois database to determine the
17
domain name and contact information for the registrant of the domain name “visit-x.net”—the
18
“destination website” to which “petronastower.net” had been directed as of December 21, 2009.
19
The Whois search results indicate Bruno Zehnder to be the registrant of “visit-x.net.” Further
20
information concerning this search, as well as a copy of the search results, can be found at GD-
21
001593—GD-001603 of Go Daddy’s production.
22
INTERROGATORY NO. 24:
23
Please describe in detail GoDaddy’s services for “External Domains” to which GoDaddy
24
refers in the document produced with production PET GD 2469 (attached hereto as Exhibit A),
25
including the technical aspects of such services and the differences, if any, between those
26
services and the “routing/forwarding the disputed domain names” to which GoDaddy refers in its
27
supplemental initial disclosures dated June 29, 2011 and by identifying all persons with
28
knowledge of the foregoing and by describing all documents related to the foregoing.
GO DADDY’S RESPONSE TO THIRD
SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 21-25)
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
~6~
APP015
4534112_2.DOCX
1
2
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 24:
In addition to the General Objections, Go Daddy objects to this interrogatory on the
3
grounds that it is cumulative, overbroad and harassing, vague, ambiguous and unintelligible,
4
particularly with respect to the phrase “services provided by GoDaddy related to the disputed
5
domain names...”.
6
Subject to and without waving the foregoing objections, Go Daddy responds as follows:
7
The reference to “External Domains” in the document Bates-numbered PET GD 2469
8
indicates that Go Daddy hosting customers can have traffic routed to Go Daddy-hosted websites
9
from domains registered elsewhere (not with Go Daddy) (“external domains”). Such routing is
10
the same as “routing/forwarding” as referenced in Go Daddy’s supplemental initial disclosures.
11
Go Daddy does not provide any services for the external domains themselves.
12
13
14
Persons with relevant knowledge include Jeff Munson and John Roling.
INTERROGATORY NO. 25:
Please state when GoDaddy first began providing the domain name forwarding service to
15
which it refers in Paragraph 29 of its Amended Answer June 20, 2011 to any customer and
16
identify all persons with knowledge of the foregoing and describe all documents related to the
17
foregoing.
18
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 25:
19
20
In addition to the General Objections, Go Daddy objects to this interrogatory on the
grounds that it is overbroad and harassing.
21
Subject to and without waving the foregoing objections, Go Daddy responds as follows:
22
Go Daddy first began providing domain name forwarding services on April 3, 2001.
23
Persons with relevant knowledge include George Kearns
24
25
Dated: October 19, 2011
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
26
By:
27
.
John L. Slafsky
David L. Lansky
Hollis Beth Hire
28
GO DADDY’S RESPONSE TO THIRD
SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 21-25)
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
~7~
APP016
4534112_2.DOCX
APP017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD
(PETRONAS),
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 09-CV-5939PJH
vs.
GODADDY.COM, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________/
::: CONFIDENTIAL :::
30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF LAURIE ANDERSON
DATE:
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
TIME:
8:54 a.m.
LOCATION:
BALLARD SPAHR, LLP
1 East Washington Street, Suite 2300
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
REPORTED BY: JANICE HARRINGTON, RPR, CRR, CLR
AZ Certified Court Reporter No. 50844
Registered Professional Reporter
Certified Realtime Reporter
Certified LiveNote Reporter
MBreporting
111 Deerwood Road, Suite 200
San Ramon, California 94583
APP018
Page 2
1
::: APPEARANCES :::
2
3
4
5
6
FOR PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS) PLAINTIFF:
Law Offices of Perry R. Clark
By: Perry R. Clark, Attorney At Law
825 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
(650) 248-5817
perry@perryclarklaw.com
7
8
9
10
11
FOR GODADDY.COM, INC., DEFENDANT:
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
By: David L. Lansky, Attorney At Law
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304-1050
(650) 320-4776
dlansky@wsgr.com:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
APP019
Page 3
1
::: INDEX OF EXAMINATIONS :::
2
EXAMINATION BY:
PAGE
3
MR. CLARK
5
4
5
6
7
::: INDEX OF REQUESTS :::
8
PAGE
LINE
32
15
REQUEST
9
10
Mark the transcript as 30(b)(6)
deposition
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
APP020
Page 4
1
::: INDEX OF EXHIBITS :::
2
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
PAGE
3
1.
Anderson 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice
6
4
2.
Document, Bates No. GD-001494-001526
9
5
3.
Document, Bates No. GD-002446-2550
14
6
4.
Document, Bates No. GD-00560-561
28
7
5.
Document, Bates No. GD-00562-563
28
8
6.
Document, Bates No. GD-000272-392
32
9
7.
Document, Bates No. GD-000393-419
32
10
8.
Document, Bates No. GD-000614-629
48
11
9.
Document, Bates No. GD-000420-487
51
12
10.
Document, Bates No. GD-000532-559
53
13
11.
Document, Bates No. GD-000500-502
61
14
12.
Document, Bates No. GD-000488-499
63
15
13.
Document, Bates No. PET GD000216-272
66
16
14.
ICANN/Uniform Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy
71
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
APP021
Page 5
1
LAURIE ANDERSON,
2
being duly sworn by the Certified Shorthand Reporter
3
to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
4
the truth, testified as follows:
5
6
EXAMINATION BY MR. CLARK
Q.
All right.
Good morning.
I'm a lawyer.
My name is
7
Perry Clark.
I represent the
8
plaintiff in this case, Petroliam Nasional Berhad
9
also known as Petronas, and I think counsel probably
10
wants to make an appearance as well.
11
MR. LANSKY:
Yeah, this is David Lansky
12
of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on behalf of the
13
deponent.
14
BY MR. CLARK:
15
Q.
Now, do you understand that the oath you
16
took today, that means that the testimony you're
17
giving today is under penalty of perjury the same as
18
it would be in a court of law?
19
A.
Yes.
20
Q.
And can I ask that if you don't
21
understand any of my questions or need clarification
22
of anything I'm asking, that you ask me to clarify
23
the question?
24
25
A.
Yes.
MR. CLARK:
Okay, great.
APP022
All right.
I'd
Page 6
1
like to have the court reporter mark as Exhibit
2
number 1 the 30(b)(6) deposition notice that we
3
served in this case.
4
5
6
(DEPOSITION EXHIBIT 1 WAS MARKED.)
BY MR. CLARK:
Q.
So I'm handing the witness what's been
7
marked as deposition Exhibit Anderson 1, and have you
8
seen this document before?
9
A.
I have.
10
Q.
And so I'd like to begin by taking your
11
deposition as a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, and we'll
12
have this part of the transcript marked as the
13
30(b)(6) deposition.
14
Now, you have been designated to testify
15
on a number of topics in this notice.
16
understand that?
17
A.
Yes.
18
Q.
Okay.
Do you
And if you could turn to page 8 of
19
the deposition notice, you'll see there there's
20
number 5 -- topic number 5.
21
A.
Okay.
22
Q.
And do you understand that you've been
23
designated to testify on that topic which is the
24
domain name forwarding service to which Go Daddy
25
refers in paragraph 29 of its amended answer, June
APP023
Page 7
1
20, 2011, including when Go Daddy began to provide
2
that service to any customer?
3
A.
Yes.
4
Q.
Okay.
Now, when did Go Daddy first
5
provide domain name forwarding services to any
6
customer?
7
A.
I believe it was April of 2001.
8
Q.
Okay.
9
And when did Go Daddy first begin
providing domain name registration for customers?
10
A.
I think it was November of 2000.
11
Q.
Go Daddy was able to provide domain name
12
registrations without providing domain name
13
forwarding services from November 2000 to April 2001?
14
A.
I didn't work there at that time so I
15
really can't say.
16
Q.
Okay.
Can you describe -- actually,
17
referring back to topic number 5, the domain name
18
forwarding service to which Go Daddy refers in
19
paragraph 29 of its amended answer, is that the
20
domain name forwarding service it provided for the
21
registrant of the domain names Petronas Tower and
22
petronastowers.net?
23
A.
Yes.
24
Q.
Can you describe that domain name
25
forwarding service for me?
APP024
Page 8
1
2
A.
Domain name forwarding directs a domain
name to a specific URL.
3
Q.
It's a type of routing.
Are ICANN accredited registrars required
4
to provide domain name forwarding to their registrant
5
customers?
6
A.
I don't know.
7
Q.
Are ICANN accredited registrars required
8
to provide any sort of routing services to their
9
registrant customers?
10
11
A.
I don't know whether that's required or
Q.
Do you know if Go Daddy was an ICANN
not.
12
13
accredited registrar between November 2000 and April
14
2001?
15
16
17
A.
I believe they became a registrar -- an
ICANN accredited registrar in November of 2000.
Q.
So ICANN stands for the Internet
18
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers; is that
19
correct?
20
A.
Correct.
21
Q.
Okay.
Does ICANN require accredited
22
registrars like Go Daddy to provide the function of
23
routing Internet traffic to websites of registrant's
24
choices?
25
A.
I don't know whether they require it, but
APP025
Page 15
1
Q.
So these would include instructions for
2
Go Daddy customers as to how to use Go Daddy's
3
services?
4
A.
Yes.
5
Q.
Could you please turn to the page marked
6
with Bates number GD-002453.
7
second full paragraph on that page, please?
8
9
A.
Now, could you read the
"If you registered your domain name with
another provider, you can still purchase a hosting
10
account with us.
11
use our CashParking or Quick Content services.
12
you do any of those, you must view your nameservers
13
and your account with us and then set the nameservers
14
with your domain name registrar."
15
Q.
These are off-site DNS services or
If
So can a customer of Go Daddy's who's
16
registered their domain name with another provider
17
purchase a hosting account and use Go Daddy's
18
off-site DNS services?
19
A.
I believe so.
20
Q.
Could -- and if a customer who registered
21
-- if a Go Daddy customer who registered their domain
22
name with another provider and had purchased a
23
hosting account with Go Daddy and used Go Daddy's
24
off-site DNS services, would that customer have to
25
use Go Daddy's nameservers?
APP026
Page 21
1
Q.
Okay.
So as Go Daddy's designated
2
representative for topic number 5 in the Rule
3
30(b)(6) deposition notice which is the domain name
4
forwarding service to which Go Daddy refers in
5
paragraph 29 of its amended answer, you don't know if
6
Go Daddy could have performed the registration and
7
maintenance of the domain names petronastower.net and
8
petronastowers.net without providing that domain name
9
forwarding service?
10
11
MR. LANSKY:
question.
12
13
14
Object to the form of the
THE WITNESS:
Can you repeat?
BY MR. CLARK:
Q.
So you understand that you're Go Daddy's
15
designated representative for topic 5 in Petronas'
16
Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice, correct?
17
A.
Yes.
18
Q.
And topic number 5 is the domain name
19
forwarding service to which Go Daddy refers in
20
paragraph 29 of its amended answer dated June 20,
21
2011, correct?
22
A.
Yes.
23
Q.
Do you know if Go Daddy would have been
24
able to perform the registration and maintenance of
25
the domain names Petronas Towers -- petronastower.net
APP027
Page 22
1
and petronastowers.net without providing that domain
2
name forwarding service?
3
MR. LANSKY:
4
THE WITNESS:
Object to the form.
I believe that's -- I
5
believe that they could depending on what the
6
customer requires or wants to do with the domain
7
name.
8
BY MR. CLARK:
9
Q.
So you believe that Go Daddy could have
10
performed the registration and maintenance of the
11
domain names Petronas Tower and petronastowers.net
12
without providing its domain name forwarding service,
13
correct?
14
MR. LANSKY:
Object to the form.
15
Misstates the entirety of her testimony and asked and
16
answered.
17
THE WITNESS:
If Petronas Towers domain
18
names could have been pointed to another website by
19
using the A record method, so I'm going to say yes.
20
BY MR. CLARK:
21
Q.
Okay.
22
A.
In other words, the same thing could have
23
24
25
been accomplished using the A record method.
Q.
Okay.
So Go Daddy did not -- well, we've
already covered that.
APP028
Page 27
1
MR. LANSKY:
2
THE WITNESS:
3
Object to the form.
I don't know.
BY MR. CLARK:
4
Q.
Do you know when Go Daddy first began
5
providing domain name forwarding services for the
6
domain name petronastower.net?
7
A.
I don't recall.
8
Q.
Do you know if Go Daddy provided domain
9
name forwarding services for petronastower.net at the
10
time it first became the registrar for that domain
11
name?
12
A.
I don't recall.
13
Q.
If Go Daddy had not provided domain name
14
forwarding services when it first became the
15
registrar of petronastower.net, could it have
16
performed the registration and maintenance of that
17
domain name?
18
MR. LANSKY:
19
THE WITNESS:
20
21
I believe so.
BY MR. CLARK:
Q.
Is the same true for petronastowers.net?
22
MR. LANSKY:
23
THE WITNESS:
24
MR. CLARK:
25
Object to the form.
Object to the form.
I believe so.
I'm now going to have the
court reporter mark as Anderson Exhibit 4 a document
APP029
Page 44
1
Q.
And in that box there it says, "Action
2
taken.
We received notification of pending court
3
dispute.
4
admin fee.
5
complaint from complainant's representative within
6
the next few days."
Lock name, set to status 10 and charged
Registrant should receive notice of the
Do you see that?
7
A.
Yes.
8
Q.
Do you know if Go Daddy had any
9
communication with the registrant of
10
petronastower.net after it received the notification
11
referred to in this document?
12
A.
I don't know.
13
Q.
Do you see to the left of this entry
14
there's a name there.
It's Christopher Patterson?
15
A.
Yes.
16
Q.
Who's Christopher Patterson?
17
A.
He's disputes representative.
18
Q.
Was he responsible for handling the
19
20
dispute regarding petronastower.net?
A.
He would have been the one that set it up
21
when we received the claim -- or when we received the
22
dispute, he would have set up the claim.
23
Q.
Okay.
Now, do you know if the registrant
24
of the domain name petronastower.net ever disputed
25
Petronas' allegations that it was committing
APP030
Page 45
1
trademark infringement?
2
A.
I don't know.
3
Q.
Okay.
Now, if you could turn to the page
4
bearing Bates number GD-00298.
And a little bit
5
above, halfway down the page there's another entry.
6
It says, "Domain services tracking."
7
towards the bottom of that entry it says, "Action
8
taken.
9
see that?
10
A.
Yes.
11
Q.
So what does that refer to?
12
A.
If we receive a court order to implement
And sort of
Transferred domain per court order."
Do you
13
a decision to or a temporary restraining order.
14
Sometimes we'll be ordered to move a domain name to
15
the control of the complaining party.
16
Q.
Okay.
Now, it says there in the next
17
row, it says, "Canceling petronastower.net order ID
18
one row ID one name space forwarding resource ID."
19
Do you see that?
20
A.
Yes.
21
Q.
What does that refer to?
22
A.
When the domain name was moved out of the
23
account, the forwarding would have been automatically
24
canceled.
25
Q.
Okay.
Now, after the domain name was
APP031
Page 65
1
A.
We could not have canceled the domain
2
names because we are subject to the UDRP.
3
would have had to have either an arbitration decision
4
or a court order to transfer the domain names or
5
cancel them.
6
Q.
Uh-huh.
So we
But is there anything in the
7
Universal Terms of Service agreement or any other
8
agreement between Go Daddy and the registrant that
9
would have prevented Go Daddy from suspending those
10
domain names in response to the complaints from
11
Petronas?
12
MR. LANSKY:
13
THE WITNESS:
14
15
Object to the form.
I don't -- I don't know.
BY MR. CLARK:
Q.
Is there anything in any of the
16
agreements between Go Daddy and the registrant of the
17
domain names petronastower.net and petronastowers.net
18
that would have prevented it from stopping its domain
19
name forwarding service for those domain names?
20
MR. LANSKY:
21
THE WITNESS:
22
23
Object to the form.
I don't know.
BY MR. CLARK:
Q.
Do you know if Go Daddy ever received any
24
complaint or any communication from the registrant of
25
those domain names when Go Daddy stopped providing
APP032
Page 66
1
its domain name forwarding service?
2
A.
I don't know.
3
Q.
Okay.
4
5
6
(DEPOSITION EXHIBIT 13 WAS MARKED.)
BY MR. CLARK:
Q.
I'm now handing the witness a document
7
that has been marked as Exhibit 13, and it has
8
production numbers PET GD000216 to 272.
9
tell me what Exhibit 13 is?
10
11
12
13
A.
And can you
It appears to be the May 2001 version of
the Registrar Accreditation Agreement.
Q.
And do you know if this is the Registrar
Accreditation Agreement that was in effect in 2010?
14
A.
I don't know.
15
Q.
Okay.
Now, is there anything in this
16
Registrar Accreditation Agreement that would have
17
prevented Go Daddy from discontinuing its domain name
18
forwarding service for the domain names Petronas
19
Tower and petronastower.net?
20
A.
I don't know.
21
Q.
Do you know why Go Daddy did not
22
discontinue its domain name forwarding service for
23
the domain name petronastower.net after it received
24
Petronas' notification of trademark infringement
25
related to that domain name?
APP033
Ý¿-»ìæðçó½ªóðëçíçóÐÖØ ܱ½«³»²¬ïí
APP034
Ú·´»¼ïîñîîñðç п¹»ï ±º í
Ý¿-»ìæðçó½ªóðëçíçóÐÖØ ܱ½«³»²¬ïí
APP035
Ú·´»¼ïîñîîñðç п¹»î ±º í
Ý¿-»ìæðçó½ªóðëçíçóÐÖØ ܱ½«³»²¬ïí
APP036
Ú·´»¼ïîñîîñðç п¹»í ±º í
Lo
(o
r
tco
r
t*co
(!)
6
h
C)
()
TF1
d
6
q
yr
F
q
o
G)
6
q
6
a
k
e
N
|r
6)
d
6
L
C)
o
*r
-tt
Fi
6
k
d)
P
\r
v
\c|
ao
\o
C\
A
ti
s?
q
o
()
o
a
E
z
r'')
F
s
o.
cf)
\9
H
0)
E
FJ
c-.
4
c\
cr)
t-oo
\o
o
al
o
sl
o
6
a
\o
H
z
(\
\o
c\
oo
rtr
F00
v
o
I
6
E
H
@
RI
z
co
c.l
lr)
$
o.l
o,
\r
rr
6
a
ii
o
h
6
z
E
F
|r)
co
s
o.l
-{
v
d
ic
a.l
...l
c..l
ro
\0
c..l
\o
a.t
v
z
c*
F.
00
\o
o.l
I
q
(l
!t
o
E
z
cO
E
c]
aa
\c|
cO
ro
\o
q
E
h
rr)
U
rYl
a11
I
u)
v)
f
oo
ca
v
co
v
6
q
q
o
a
tA
n
z
F
rh
cO
co
L
o
E
I
U
.l
q
F
tl
B
a
r)
Fao
o,
c.l
sl
a
6
CI
6
@
N
a.l
rco
o,
e.l
=
9
a
d
o
6
o
z
F
z
l.-
c\
\o
en
F
z
p.
F
z
rYI
v
H
ca)
F
6l
ca
q.
k
I
h
F]
tlr
f-.
&
f\
A
q
o
c€
@
o
d
z
A
Y
E
N
co
co
o\
t )
q
A
g
r)
F-
cc
co
c.l
ti
@
!i
a
z
n
B
v
o.
aa
o,
ca
L
d)
F
rrl
F
z
z
Fr
rrl
E
{
rrl
F
L,)
Q
rrl
(h
B
a
a
U)
a
a
0)
E
h
U)
o
c)
t-t1
to
v
e.l
aFl
al
c.)
E
ao
v
c\
s
a.l
s
c\
\o
c.l
s
(}.l
cr
E
ll
F
il
E
a
tl
t
z
z
B
()
(;)
X
a)
B
q
o0
d
':l
(h
a
.H
fi
b0
B
q
q
4
.E
U)
o
a
bt)
cl
b0
d
{
fi
0)
U)
()
CN
O
a
o
t*'
v
6
c
i
a.)
\o
(:'l
N
s
OD
k
ts
k
o
Y
0)
L
o
6
a)
E
t--
E
c'l
co
+
a.t
C.l
ao
c\
s
c\
t--
c\
a.l
t\
s
e..l
a.)
r-
C)
oo
H
p
a
(J
0)
U)
.E
i3
tl
B
o
T':
z
rrl
m,
I
+t
v)
q
!
?1
c.l
sr
ro
a.t
v
k
lr
O
=
I
Fr
z
rrl
z
z
tl
)F
q
q
'E
(n
C-l
q
(A
0,o
E
+r
DO
d2
U)
@
)
v)
H
I
a
B
ll
z
I
F
z
fYl
F
T
o
an
o.
ra
\o
c.l
B
z
6
c)
()
6
o
fr
z
c
lr
N
J
.l
4
z
F,
rrl
I
cn
cft
$
B
.f,
h
c)
s
o,
\o
F
4
Z,
s
Fr
2
Er
g
$
c!
ra
cr)
c
0)
UI
o
E
b0
1
;
q
b0
'.5
u
q)
q
lT1
$
at
{
R
rrl
L)
P
z
I
(J
rrl
fr'l
E
L
ca
o.
cn
E
\c)
z
F
@
C)
a
q
s?
o.
o.l
00
00
\o
o\
e..l
rr)
l*.
oo
&
oo
oo
@
t
o\
co
co
c.l
o
()
0.)
d
C)
6
h
o)
()
q
z
z
Y
c\
\o
z
z
H
rr\
t'|-.
z
5
il
d
F
o
c)
d
0)
U)
q
o
!
i)
H
00
q
+
c{
co
\0
a.l
\l-
cf)
c.l
e.l
v
c.|
aa
ca
crl
\g)
c\
a'l
\o
c.l
e.l
s
{:'l
s
\c)
sf
(\.l
b0
q
c
()
o
u
(A
(.)
0a
V
4
B
o
tl
frr
v
j
F
rr\
U
r'i
F
k
A
F
rr1
I
U)
50
cn
\o
c.l
$
v
c..l
cO
aa
F
bo
g)
a
'E
B
ll
c/)
'
rrl
Q
z
j
k
.o
k
ca
\o
$
o\
\o
c.l
Ol
F
\o
o
tr
a
p.
d
q
ti
k
O)
O)
c!
B
6
h
c.t
't
r
E
;
O
ooo
a
l-
st
€
oq)
LO
o)
o;
I
r
r
r
r
()
c{
L(-)
r
I
(o
O
O
ci
?
c{
t\
O
O
N
(o
t-
CD
o
U)
o
o
z
rar)
r)
\o
o.l
rir
N
c{
O
O
O
o
(,
C)
o
z
|.U
o
tL
z
F
APP037
LO
T-
r
(o
O)
O)
c{
\-.
E
;
o
o.
oo
a
T-
o
TL
o)
p
o)
I
r
r
r
r
O
c{
I
LO
r
(O
O
P
c
O
c{
r
N
O
c)
c{
(o
cf)
t-
o
rts
a
o
o
z
l*o\
ao
cO
or
FcA
n
it)
L
.A
q
:i
6
()
z
F
*
\o
c.l
oo
cO
g
k
Fr
rrl
z
d
z
z
tl
F
v)
F
{
I
\o
o.
o\
.I
k
(n
o'
c.l
o\
k
d)
d
H
6
a
5
U
d
d
@
d
t:
a
d
o
q
F
v
fl
F
rrl
z
H
z
F,i
(A
g
@
fl
t!
a
-
rrl
v)
rrl
rT\
i-
e\
q
X
$
R
EU)
6
bo
F
a
E
d
.A
Y
V
€z
r-
E
c
h
bJ)
n
a
d
0)
cd
d)
o
t4
v
dJ
@
.i
6
-{
IF
q
o
k
rts
rr1
a
.o
.r{
0)
o
q
@
>|
0l
z
oo
frl
U)
c
z
50
>.
o
q
q
g
aj
.a
F
rrl
z
F
t!
z
F
v)
>.
q
d
trl
k
6
6
L
rrl
q)
v
z
v)
al>
!qs
so\
HT
E
6
H
z
z
z
H
a
z
F
a
>l
(d
N
.bq
TT
F V
uo\
o i
gE
v)
rrl
z
s0
c
$
*
rc.l
$
t-F.
c.l
o\
o.
T
c.l
o.
cr.
k
d
F
€
Fi
ir)
4
z
=
H
z
f- l?
(/)Uo
sFi
O
9e
F
€s
J Y
cnY
E*l
€E
'li v)
11 (,
q
Irf
h
@
q
6
C)
ri
L
a.l
F-
co
c.)
F-.
cal
II
tr
ir\
z
<
4
H
z
{
F
a
0)
lt
d
F*
o'
co
t l
o'
Faa
ta)
tl
Fl
z
<
7
=
o
h
()
sl
q
o
d
k
d
rO
L
ra)
ol\
0.
o.l
k
d
o F l
$l 3
I Y H
o9i
H F
Cs?
>j:
d o
>l
O H
:1
o
U
q
e
6
rJ
b0
d
z
ot'
rt)
co
ao
o,
a.l
3
a
N
6
c)
ca
\o
t-c\o
v
co
@
v
o\
aa
o.
t t
\o
!
E
F
z
q
a
I
z
I
F
k
(,)
k
bo
d
!14
c6
d
0a
G
G
a
d
B
6
d
G
-
k
E
r=
L;
>|
B
d
bb
Frr')
7
U)
v
-
F
01
6
6
z
o.
V)
co
ao
o
rrl
d
u)
'F
X lr'
F5,
aHr
FJ{I
z
50
-v
k
F"
F
()
a
k
q
d
6
L
F
Efr
c.l
d
\
cl
r/.) k
+,92
s
x
H , H
- H
d
o v
q f
g=
.!tr
3s
o ir.
V) q.
k
V
o
q
k
()
-
z
o,
ar)
c.l
c\
ao
aO
0{t
F
C€
z
I
B
t
A
o.
lr}
00
aa
o,
al
6
d
6
t.i
6
o
F
z
Y
E
+
(J\
cn
!
c)
eo
o,
N
O
o
.r.t
fd
irl
(9
o
H
lr
ir)
frl
o
,4
F
z
,o
o
,-.
G
C)
o
d
00
rrl
2
rr'l
z
B
z
;Y
(A
Y
v)
z
F
trl
ba
=
q
N
z
E
a.t
c\
co
cr)
co
c\
fo
co
00
c..l
a.l
ao
co
c.l
ao
aa
0,o
co
c\
ao
@
q
o.l
co
ao
a.l
&
cr)
a.l
co
ao
co
a.l
F
U)
F
C)
q
c)
q
.c
rrl
-
Y.
v)
z,
L4
tr
trl
k
6
k
z,
ti
k
o
u
o
F
fr'l
N
$
rir
I R
I
9pr
z>1
F
o,
e.l
ao
o.
$
o'
=r
4
d)
G)
4
L d )
U
{
F
u)
6
o
g
d
d
\c)
U
\o
N
a
(A
1l
o
a.l
c.)
-l
(n
oo
r
$
r.)
F-
o.
c.l
t-
+
cr)
o,
c.l
t-*
ail
\f,
o'
I
co
o,
c{
()
c)
()
o
CI
O
z
o
tL
o
tU
z
F
APP038
LO
r
r
(o
Cl)
O)
c{
r
o
E
:
oo-
o
U)
t-
o
(L
p
CF)
O)
I
r
r
r
r
O
e{
LO
r
(o
I
O
I
O
I
N
l'-
c)
O
c\I
(o
c)
o
t-
a
o
o
z
v
l*.'
co
co
\o
cr.
N
tl
F"
rrl
z
rYl
B
)i
rl
v)
z
F
frl
o)
6
d
6
H
(.)
a
g
A
o
a
U
r)
I
H
ca
tr
6
d
F
h1
F
F.l
z
F
rrl
z
z
r
a
F
rrl
U1
n
F
z
.).
F
z
F"
rrl
rrl
Y
r
a
F
n.
rrl
F
z
rrl
'6
k
c)
P
00
!
D
d
F
rrl
'6
3
o
L
GI
d
6
a
F
C)
h
c
:Y
q
s)
d
a
c'
g
F
q)
q
q
N
o
k
H
N
H
o
p
JJ
0
0)
4)
F
a
q
6
.a
q
k
C)
d
6
x
B
6)
tl
q
c)
a
@
c)
Y
6
F
€
F2
6
ri
o
6i)
a
Y
G
€
B
H
cl
o
a
H
d)
d
h
H
€
'
c)
q
a
@
a
B
-o
d
g
rd
q)
4
a
tn
(J
x 50x
x qx
k
u
Q
>|
t+i
I
€
d
U
h
tr
A
d
.E
()
6
9t
d
a
d
't
q
00
(,
o
.9t
d
d
a
o
9a
n
.
A a
: h
q E
9 F
a P .
- .pt
iu
E X
q F
T H
9
o >
@
l i . )
ur
d
c0
:
Fl
6
U
F
cl
z
6
oo
qt
Y
ooI)
F
rrl
z
n
rrl
F
Y
a
z
F
rr'1
k
a
U)
U
o,
oo
r$
h
r \
ba
F
o
(J
P
i)
(n
5
a
L
V
H
N
Q
@
'l:
F{
ir't
z
n
rrl
B
d
F
F
r \
z
q
G
E
.H
o
50
s
z
Lr
ir't
d
frl
F
U)
z
tr
rr)
k
o
'i
C)
F
-a
F
6
o
6
d
a
d
(n
E
$
\o
d
(tl
o.l
s
.+
ro
$
E
3
d
o
6
a
d
(,)
6
6
6
!1
.E
k
6
o
d
4)
F
0)
o
s?
d
N
H
q
TF1
\t
Qq)
xn 0)
_v'o
uc)
: : 4
' 5 7o
;
gr
F-q
d
d
d
a
ol
o.
f\
C.l
€
6
14
B
'd
I
6
o
6
al
ii
q
V)
p
F
v)
o
ca
o'
N
N
sl
z
tr)
d
ca
r-.
F
rr1
H
k
N
d
E
c.l
c4
N
!
Q
6
k
rOur world-class data center
> Best-of-breed routers, firewalls and servers
> 24/7 support
> State-of-the-art Security
> Website statistics
> NO hidden fees
> FREE! $100.00 ad credits from Google®†
> FREE email addresses
> FREE setup and software
> FREE! 10 Fotolia® photo credits†††
> Google® Webmaster Tools
> One-click setup
> Get priority access to our exclusive Hosting Concierge Service
> Daily backup
> FTP access
for fast, expert, setup using our toll-free number. **
Need more power? Then get one of our Virtual Dedicated or Dedicated servers
3.1 MILLION
*, **, ‡, ‡‡, ‡‡‡, 1, 2, 3, 4,+, °, °°, †, ††, †††, ^ Click here for product disclaimers and legal policies.
Third-party logos and marks are registered trademarks of their respective owners. All rights reserved.
My Account
My Renewals
My Upgrades
Account Settings
Customer Information
Order History
Create Account
Domain Search
Product Catalog
Product Advisor
Go Daddy Gear
Gift Cards
Go Daddy Mobile
Deals of the Day
Webmail
WHOIS search
ICANN Confirmation
Affiliates
Follow & Fan Us
Legal
Commercial Contests
Site Map
Telephone Support & Sales
Go Daddy Community
Discussion Forums
Help and Guides
User Groups
Submit Support Ticket
Site Suggestions
Report Spam
Go Daddy Scoop
About Us
News Releases
Careers
Marketing Opportunities
Customer Testimonials
Security Center
.ME Scholarship
Round Up for Charity
YourEmail@YourWebsite.com
Our Partners
Use of this Site is subject to express Terms of Use. By using this Site, you signify that you agree to be bound by these Terms of Use, which were last revised on August 5, 2011.
Legal
Privacy Policy
GoDaddy.com is the world's No. 1 ICANN-accredited domain name registrar for .COM, .NET, .ORG, .INFO, .BIZ and .US domain extensions. Source: RegistrarSTATS.com
Copyright © 1999 - 2011 GoDaddy.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
What is Hosting?
Hosting (also known as Web site hosting or Web hosting) is the business of housing, serving and maintaining files for one or more Web sites, and providing Internet access (bandwidth). Hosting
provides individuals or organizations with the systems to store information, images, video, or other content accessible to users of the Web. In a sense, you rent space on a computer to hold your
Web site. Your host, the computer where your Web site files are stored, assigns an address (DNS) for your files to your domain name so that anyone can find your Web site on the Internet by typing
your domain name.
GoDaddy.com is rated the World's largest Hosting Provider according to Netcraft. Whether you choose Windows Hosting or Linux Hosting, our world-class Web Hosting services also include
email, databases, FREE applications, FREE access to the exclusive Go Daddy Hosting Connection community and much more.
Unlike many competing Web Hosting Companies, we own, operate and support our hosting services and pass the savings on to you. Our Affordable Web Hosting is fine for most personal and small
business sites. We also offer Business Hosting packages that offer discounted bundles with all the products you need to build, optimize and promote your Web site.
While our hosting plans are ideal for most individuals and small businesses, our Dedicated Servers and Virtual Dedicated Servers are perfect for hosting multiple traffic-intensive Web sites on one
server, running enterprise or gaming applications, or operating development environments. You always have the option of purchasing a preconfigured dedicated or virtual dedicated server plan or
the flexibility to build your own server.
And if conventional hosting plans can't keep up with your demands, Grid Hosting from Go Daddy puts the power of multiple servers to work for you. With elastic scalability, 99.9% uptime and no
need for site migration during growth spurts, Grid Hosting is always at the ready.
APP044
http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/web-hosting.aspx?ci=8971
PET GD002470
9/19/2011
Web Hosting | Secure Hosting Plans with Unlimited Bandwidth
APP045
http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/web-hosting.aspx?ci=8971
Page 4 of 4
PET GD002471
9/19/2011
APP046
APP047
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?