Pimental v. Google, Inc. et al
Filing
65
Request for Judicial Notice re 64 MOTION to Stay Litigation Based on Recently Filed FCC Petition filed byGoogle, Inc., Slide, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Related document(s) 64 ) (Reiten, Joshua) (Filed on 3/26/2012)
EXHIBIT 7
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
BRIAN GLAUSER,
Plaintiff(s),
8
9
v.
ORDER
TWILIO, INC. , et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 11-2584 PJH
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
12
13
Before the court is plaintiff’s notice of decision by the Federal Communications
14
Commission (“FCC”) in which he requests that the court lift the stay imposed pursuant to
15
the primary jurisdiction doctrine on January 27, 2012, at least as to defendant GroupMe.
16
Defendant construes the “notice” as a motion for administrative relief and opposes it. For
17
the reasons advanced by GroupMe, the court is not inclined to lift the stay as to one
18
defendant but not the other, and accordingly DENIES the motion. Additionally, because
19
one of the reasons for the stay pertains to the liability of co-defendant Twilio and the
20
petition on that issue still remains before the FCC, the stay remains in effect. If GroupMe’s
21
petition for expedited declaratory ruling and clarification is acted on during the period of the
22
stay, the parties shall bring it to the court’s attention; however, the instant ruling is not
23
based on GroupMe’s filing of the subsequent petition. For now, the stay remains based
24
solely on the remaining of the two grounds for its initial imposition.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 15, 2012
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?