Carreon v. Inman et al
Filing
25
DECLARATION of Kurt Opsahl in Opposition to 20 Ex Parte Application For Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Shaw Cause Re Preliminary Injunction filed byMatthew Inman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N)(Related document(s) 20 ) (Opsahl, Kurt) (Filed on 7/1/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Kurt Opsahl (SBN 191303)
kurt@eff.org
Matthew Zimmerman (SBN 212423)
mattz@eff.org
Corynne McSherry (SBN 221504)
corynne@eff.org
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: (415) 436-9333
Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
Venkat Balasubramani (SBN 189192)
venkat@focallaw.com
Focal PLLC
800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: (206) 529-4827
Facsimile: (206) 260-3966
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Inman
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CHARLES CARREON,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MATTHEW INMAN, INDIEGOGO, INC., )
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, )
AND AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY,
)
and Does 1 – 100,
)
Defendants,
)
)
and
)
)
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the
)
)
State of California,
)
)
A Person To Be Joined If
)
Feasible Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 ))
Case No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC
DECLARATION OF KURT OPSAHL IN
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
Date: TBD
Time: TBD
Courtroom: 5 – 17th Floor
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
28
No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC
OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
1
I, Kurt Opsahl, of full age, certify, declare and state:
2
1.
I am an attorney at law, duly licensed and admitted to practice in the State of
3
California. I am a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit legal services
4
organization, and counsel for Defendant-Movant Matthew Inman. The facts contained in the
5
following affidavit are known to me of my own personal knowledge and if called upon to testify, I
6
could and would competently do so.
7
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the following blog post:
8
What should I do about FunnyJunk.com?, The Oatmeal Blog (May 25, 2011), available at
9
http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk (copy downloaded on June 28, 2012).
10
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the following news
11
article: Nate Anderson, The Oatmeal vs. FunnyJunk: webcomic copyright fight gets personal, Ars
12
Technica (June 2, 2011, 6:05 AM PDT), available at http://arstechnica.com/tech-
13
policy/2011/06/funnyjunk-vs-the-oatmeal (copy downloaded on June 28, 2012).
14
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the following blog post:
15
FunnyJunk is threatening to file a federal lawsuit against me unless I pay $20,000 in damages, The
16
Oatmeal Blog (June 11, 2012), available at http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk_letter (copy
17
downloaded on June 28, 2012).
18
5.
Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the following news
19
article: Danny Bradbury, Win, Lose or Draw, The Stranger (June 19, 2012), available at
20
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/win-lose-or-draw/Content?oid=13970862 (copy downloaded
21
on June 28, 2012).
22
6.
Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the following news article:
23
Danny Bradbury, The Oatmeal beat Funnyjunk, but other cartoonists aren’t so lucky (June 21,
24
2012, 1:55 EDT), available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jun/21/oatmeal-
25
carreon-comics-property (copy downloaded on June 28, 2012).
26
27
7.
Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the following webpage:
Indiegogo, BearLove Good. Cancer Bad., Campaign Announcements Only, available at
28
No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC
1
OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
1
http://www.indiegogo.com/bearlovegood?c=activity&a=796080 (copy downloaded on June 28,
2
2012).
8.
3
Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of the following news
4
article: Dave Thier, Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn’t Afraid of The Oatmeal, Forbes (June
5
15, 2012, 11:43 AM), available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk-
6
lawyer-charles-carreon-isnt-afraid-of-the-oatmeal (copy downloaded on June 29, 2012).
9.
7
Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of the following news
8
article: Nate Anderson, Lawyer demands $20,000, so webcomic raises $100,000 from the Internet,
9
Ars Technica (June 12, 2012, 7:44 AM PDT), available at http://arstechnica.com/tech-
10
policy/2012/06/lawyer-demands-20000-so-webcomic-raises-100000-from-the-internet (copy
11
downloaded on June 29, 2012).
10.
12
Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of the following news article:
13
Mary Elizabeth Wilson, Internet shocker: Kindness wins, Salon (June 12 2012, 1:20 PM PDT),
14
available at http://www.salon.com/2012/06/12/internet_shocker_kindness_wins (copy downloaded
15
on June 29, 2012).
16
11.
Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of the following blog post:
17
Rosa Golijan, Cartoonist turns lawsuit threat into $100K charity fundraiser, Digital Life on Today
18
(Updated June 12, 2012, 7:43 PM ET), available at
19
http://digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com/_nv/more/section/archive?date=2012/6 (follow “Cartoonist
20
turns lawsuit threat into $100K charity fundraiser” hyperlink) (copy downloaded on June 29,
21
2012).
22
12.
Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of the following news
23
article: Chris Matyszczyk, Can charity squash frivolous lawsuits?, CNET News (June 12, 2012,
24
10:37 PM PDT), available at http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57452051-71/can-charity-
25
squash-frivolous-lawsuits (copy downloaded on June 29, 2012).
26
27
13.
Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of the following blog post:
Ken White, Hey, Did Somebody Say Something Was Going On With The Oatmeal?, Popehat (June
28
No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC
2
OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
1
12, 2012), available at http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/12/hey-did-somebody-say-something-
2
was-going-on-with-the-oatmeal (copy downloaded on June 29, 2012).
3
14.
Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of the following news
4
article: Casey Johnson, Lawyer tries and fails to shut down The Oatmeal’s charitable fundraiser,
5
Ars Technica (June 15, 2012, 7:44 AM PDT), available at http://arstechnica.com/tech-
6
policy/2012/06/lawyer-tries-and-fails-to-shut-down-the-oatmeals-charitable-fundraiser (copy
7
downloaded on June 29, 2012).
8
9
15.
Attached hereto as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy of the following news
article: Cyrus Farivar, The Internet’s most hated man, Ars Technica (June 21 2012, 1:30 PM
10
PDT), available at http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/the-persecution-of-charles-carreon
11
(copy downloaded on June 29, 2012).
12
13
14
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Executed July 1, 2012 at San Francisco, California.
15
/s/ Kurt Opsahl
Kurt Opsahl
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC
3
OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that on July 1, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the
3
Clerk of the Court, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the
4
counsel of record in this matter who are registered on the CM/ECF system.
5
Executed on July 1, 2012, in San Francisco, California.
6
/s/ Kurt Opsahl
Kurt Opsahl
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC
4
OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?