Carreon v. Inman et al

Filing 25

DECLARATION of Kurt Opsahl in Opposition to 20 Ex Parte Application For Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Shaw Cause Re Preliminary Injunction filed byMatthew Inman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N)(Related document(s) 20 ) (Opsahl, Kurt) (Filed on 7/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kurt Opsahl (SBN 191303) kurt@eff.org Matthew Zimmerman (SBN 212423) mattz@eff.org Corynne McSherry (SBN 221504) corynne@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 Venkat Balasubramani (SBN 189192) venkat@focallaw.com Focal PLLC 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone: (206) 529-4827 Facsimile: (206) 260-3966 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Inman 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CHARLES CARREON, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MATTHEW INMAN, INDIEGOGO, INC., ) NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, ) AND AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, ) and Does 1 – 100, ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the ) ) State of California, ) ) A Person To Be Joined If ) Feasible Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 )) Case No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC DECLARATION OF KURT OPSAHL IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Date: TBD Time: TBD Courtroom: 5 – 17th Floor Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 28 No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 1 I, Kurt Opsahl, of full age, certify, declare and state: 2 1. I am an attorney at law, duly licensed and admitted to practice in the State of 3 California. I am a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit legal services 4 organization, and counsel for Defendant-Movant Matthew Inman. The facts contained in the 5 following affidavit are known to me of my own personal knowledge and if called upon to testify, I 6 could and would competently do so. 7 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the following blog post: 8 What should I do about FunnyJunk.com?, The Oatmeal Blog (May 25, 2011), available at 9 http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk (copy downloaded on June 28, 2012). 10 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the following news 11 article: Nate Anderson, The Oatmeal vs. FunnyJunk: webcomic copyright fight gets personal, Ars 12 Technica (June 2, 2011, 6:05 AM PDT), available at http://arstechnica.com/tech- 13 policy/2011/06/funnyjunk-vs-the-oatmeal (copy downloaded on June 28, 2012). 14 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the following blog post: 15 FunnyJunk is threatening to file a federal lawsuit against me unless I pay $20,000 in damages, The 16 Oatmeal Blog (June 11, 2012), available at http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk_letter (copy 17 downloaded on June 28, 2012). 18 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the following news 19 article: Danny Bradbury, Win, Lose or Draw, The Stranger (June 19, 2012), available at 20 http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/win-lose-or-draw/Content?oid=13970862 (copy downloaded 21 on June 28, 2012). 22 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the following news article: 23 Danny Bradbury, The Oatmeal beat Funnyjunk, but other cartoonists aren’t so lucky (June 21, 24 2012, 1:55 EDT), available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jun/21/oatmeal- 25 carreon-comics-property (copy downloaded on June 28, 2012). 26 27 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the following webpage: Indiegogo, BearLove Good. Cancer Bad., Campaign Announcements Only, available at 28 No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC 1 OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 1 http://www.indiegogo.com/bearlovegood?c=activity&a=796080 (copy downloaded on June 28, 2 2012). 8. 3 Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of the following news 4 article: Dave Thier, Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn’t Afraid of The Oatmeal, Forbes (June 5 15, 2012, 11:43 AM), available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk- 6 lawyer-charles-carreon-isnt-afraid-of-the-oatmeal (copy downloaded on June 29, 2012). 9. 7 Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of the following news 8 article: Nate Anderson, Lawyer demands $20,000, so webcomic raises $100,000 from the Internet, 9 Ars Technica (June 12, 2012, 7:44 AM PDT), available at http://arstechnica.com/tech- 10 policy/2012/06/lawyer-demands-20000-so-webcomic-raises-100000-from-the-internet (copy 11 downloaded on June 29, 2012). 10. 12 Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of the following news article: 13 Mary Elizabeth Wilson, Internet shocker: Kindness wins, Salon (June 12 2012, 1:20 PM PDT), 14 available at http://www.salon.com/2012/06/12/internet_shocker_kindness_wins (copy downloaded 15 on June 29, 2012). 16 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of the following blog post: 17 Rosa Golijan, Cartoonist turns lawsuit threat into $100K charity fundraiser, Digital Life on Today 18 (Updated June 12, 2012, 7:43 PM ET), available at 19 http://digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com/_nv/more/section/archive?date=2012/6 (follow “Cartoonist 20 turns lawsuit threat into $100K charity fundraiser” hyperlink) (copy downloaded on June 29, 21 2012). 22 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of the following news 23 article: Chris Matyszczyk, Can charity squash frivolous lawsuits?, CNET News (June 12, 2012, 24 10:37 PM PDT), available at http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57452051-71/can-charity- 25 squash-frivolous-lawsuits (copy downloaded on June 29, 2012). 26 27 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of the following blog post: Ken White, Hey, Did Somebody Say Something Was Going On With The Oatmeal?, Popehat (June 28 No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC 2 OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 1 12, 2012), available at http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/12/hey-did-somebody-say-something- 2 was-going-on-with-the-oatmeal (copy downloaded on June 29, 2012). 3 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of the following news 4 article: Casey Johnson, Lawyer tries and fails to shut down The Oatmeal’s charitable fundraiser, 5 Ars Technica (June 15, 2012, 7:44 AM PDT), available at http://arstechnica.com/tech- 6 policy/2012/06/lawyer-tries-and-fails-to-shut-down-the-oatmeals-charitable-fundraiser (copy 7 downloaded on June 29, 2012). 8 9 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy of the following news article: Cyrus Farivar, The Internet’s most hated man, Ars Technica (June 21 2012, 1:30 PM 10 PDT), available at http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/the-persecution-of-charles-carreon 11 (copy downloaded on June 29, 2012). 12 13 14 I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed July 1, 2012 at San Francisco, California. 15 /s/ Kurt Opsahl Kurt Opsahl 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC 3 OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that on July 1, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the 3 Clerk of the Court, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the 4 counsel of record in this matter who are registered on the CM/ECF system. 5 Executed on July 1, 2012, in San Francisco, California. 6 /s/ Kurt Opsahl Kurt Opsahl 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC 4 OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?