Carreon v. Inman et al

Filing 25

DECLARATION of Kurt Opsahl in Opposition to 20 Ex Parte Application For Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Shaw Cause Re Preliminary Injunction filed byMatthew Inman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N)(Related document(s) 20 ) (Opsahl, Kurt) (Filed on 7/1/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit G Exhibit G Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal... Real Time +3 posts this hour http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk-... Most Popular Lists Video Happiest Jobs In America The World's Billionaires Buffett, Bon Jovi Duet FREE TRIAL ISSUE Log in | Sign up | Connect | Help Dave Thier, Contributor I write about video games and technology. Follow (127) T EC H | 6/15/2012 @ 11:43AM | 88,706 views Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal 20 comments, 5 called-out + Comment now The story so far: Matt Inman, AKA The Oatmeal, complains about Funnyjunk.com using his comics without permission. Intellectual property lawyer Charles Carreon sends him a letter asking for $20,000 as recompense for this “defamation.” Instead, Matt Inman sends him a letter explaining why he’s not going to do that, raises more than $140,000 for charity, and draws a comic insinuating that Funnyjunk’s collective mother would not be entirely unhappy about making love to a Kodiak bear. Charles Carreon finds himself at the center of an internet firestorm. Attorney Charles Carreon (Photo When I talked to Carreon last night, credit: Wikipedia) however, he didn’t seem the least bit fazed by all the negative attention he’s been getting throughout the internets, or even the more aggressive incursions onto his Twitter account or WordPress site. In fact, he seemed excited about this bizarre new world he had stumbled into. For him, the Funnyjunk stuff is old news – this is about himself, Matt Inman, and the great wide internet. 212 2041 35 17 Most Read on Forbes 11839 People Places Companies How LinkedIn Has Turned Your Resume Into A Cash Machine +48,181 views 651 In his 20 years as a lawyer, he says, he’s written hundreds of letters like the one he sent Inman, but the response to this one was unique. “So someone takes one of my letters and takes it apart. That doesn’t mean you can just declare netwar, 1 of 7 NEWS Supreme Court Upholds Obamacare: What It Means, What Happens Next +39,056 views Why The Obamacare Decision Is Very Good News For Women +25,869 views How Obamacare Dramatically Increases the Cost of Insurance for Young Workers +25,001 views ArenaNet Founder Mike O'Brien 6/29/12 12:40 AM Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal... Real Time +3 posts this hour http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk-... Most Popular Lists Video Happiest Jobs In America The World's Billionaires Buffett, Bon Jovi Duet so I have to change my password. You can’t The Oatmeal of Instigating Attacks encourage people to violate my trademark and violate my twitter name and associate me with Against Him incompetence with stupidity, and douchebaggery,” he says. “And if that’s where the world is going I will fight with every ounce of force in this 5’11 180 pound frame against it. I’ve got the energy, and I’ve got the Dave Thier Contributor time.” It’s a bold notion, saying that you’ve got as much time and energy as the internet. He compares Inman’s charity campaign to when people would sell tickets to throw balls at women being accused of witches in a dunking tank. Money for charity is raised, of course, but the witches aren’t in on it. He may have a very difficult time proving that Inman “instigated attacks,” as he said on his website, but he’s certain he can find some legal recourse for what’s going on right now – “California code is just so long, but there’s something in there about this,” he says. Carreon is mostly fascinated about plumbing the depths of internet rage, and he’s diving in. He says he takes the time to respond to hate mail, but marvels at the extent of the language people use. “What I see is a world that is transforming before my eyes, and I’m very fortunate to be at the forefront of a lot of technical development, and you can’t learn anything being timid,” he says. “My hero is Cyrano de Bergerac, and he said that he’d rather have an enemy than kiss ass, just to sum it up,” he continued. “I welcome the opportunity to confront legally the misuse of a new technology.” Dave Thier Contributor Follow (127) I'm a freelance writer whose work has appeared in The Atlantic, The New York Times, The New Republic, IGN.com, Wired and more. I cover social games, video games, technology and that whole gray area that happens when technology and consumers collide. Google The author is a Forbes contributor. The opinions expressed are those of the writer. DA VE TH IE R’ S P OP U LA R P OSTS iPhone 5: Every iPhone Accessory You Own Just Became Obsolete 140,088 views Is This The Real Reason Why MegaUpload Was Shut Down? 99,523 views Tucker Max's Rejected Twitter Campaign and Stab at Celebrity Endorsement 93,975 views Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal 88,702 views Mass Effect 3, Gears of War 3, and Why Reviewers Fail 77,332 views M O RE FRO M DA VE TH IE R Who Just Made a Billion Dollars? This bizarre saga may be just beginning. 20 comments, 5 called-out 212 Email + Comment now 2041 Print Report Corrections 17 Request Reprint Our Real-Time Billionaires scoreboard tracks the biggest holdings for 50 of the world’s wealthiest people. See who's up & who's down right now » More on Forbes Right Now FE A TU RE S The Five Hallmarks of 2 of 7 Turning Slumdogs Into Facebook's Lame Attempt To Force 6/29/12 12:40 AM Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal... Real Time +3 posts this hour http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk-... Most Popular Lists Video Happiest Jobs In America The World's Billionaires Buffett, Bon Jovi Duet Forbes Video Delta Rae Live From The Forbes Newsroom Share Prev Next continue » powered by distributed by Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up to comment. Enter Your Comment Forbes writers have the ability to call out member comments they find particularly interesting. Called-out comments are highlighted across the Forbes network. You'll be notified if your comment is called out. Comments CALLED-OUT Expand All Comments + expand 3 comments + expand comment another_reader 1 week ago It appears Mr Carreon has just discovered the internet 10 years ago. It is amazing how out of touch he is, and his choice of posturing in this manner digging in for a client he took on who is clearly in the wrong. Props to him for sticking up for the client, although my condolences for what this will do for his career to lose so gloriously for a misguided cause. Called-out comment 3 of 7 6/29/12 12:40 AM Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal... Real Time +3 posts this hour http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk-... Most Popular Lists Video Happiest Jobs In America The World's Billionaires Buffett, Bon Jovi Duet + expand 2 comments + expand comment + expand comment TexasSwede 1 week ago The interesting thing is that Charles Carreon himself is critical of how Youtube operates. He posted in 2010 on his blog about how Youtube profit from having users upload copyrighted content, and not policing it well enough. Basically the same as FunnyJunk does, except that Youtube actually have plenty of original content as well. Of course, as that information was published on some sites, Charles Carreon quickly took down his blog. It is still cached by Google, though: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com /search?q=cache:z9UHSdTm6D4J:www.charlescarreon.com/notable-cyber-law-cases /caveat-creator-dmca-google/2010/06/23 In case Charles Carreon try to get Google to delete that (for him very embarrassing) data from the cache, here is the content. It is quoted under “fair use”, as critizism and for commenting. ————————————————————Home / Charles’ Blog /Notable Cases / “Caveat Creator,” The DMCA According to Google June 23, 2010 All Google Needed Was An Effective Takedown System to Reach the Safe Harbor In granting summary judgment against Viacom on the grounds that Google was a legitimate Online Service Provider with an effective takedown system, and therefore entitled to receive the benefit of the DMCA “Safe Harbor” under 17 USC 512(c), the District Court cites copious amounts of legislative history establishing that without the safe harbor, the Internet might not grow robustly. (Download PDF) Google’s general knowledge that there was a whole lot of infringement happening on YouTube didn’t mean that it was obligated to start screening for infringing content or hunting it down once it was posted, because their job is just to have an effective takedown system to remove content once the creator tells them it’s infringing. The burden of discovering infringing content never shifts to the Online Service Provider, and it’s always the copyright holder’s job to find it and identify it by URL. The court said: Mere knowledge of prevalence of such activity in general is not enough. That is consistent with an area of the law devoted to protection of distinctive individual works, not of libraries. To let knowledge of a generalized practice of infringement in the industry, or of a proclivity of users to post infringing materials, impose responsibility on service providers to discover which of their users’ postings infringe a copyright would contravene the structure and operation of the DMCA. YouTube Is DMCA-Friendly, Napster Was Not The court also held that even though YouTube technology made it easy to infringe, that didn’t make it like Grokster or Napster, because those were systems that were designed to foment piracy. This is an interesting distinction, because creating a video bazaar where everyone knows you can find stolen content doesn’t seem that different from creating a file sharing system where everyone knows you can create stolen content, but it’s different in one important way — Napster and Grokster never went around deleting content, and had no mechanism that would allow a copyright holder to locate where the content was and send a takedown notice. This really means that some technology is DMCA-friendly (YouTube-style video communities) and some is not. Ad Revenue From Tainted Traffic Is Pure The court rejected the argument that Google should lose the DMCA safe harbor because it was generating ad traffic by having a site that in general, contains a lot of infringing content. This part of the opinion isn’t very satisfying. The court seems to be finessing the issue when it says: The safe harbor requires that the service provider “not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in a case in which the service provider has the right and ability to control such activity ” § 512(c) (1) (B). The “right and ability to control” the activity requires knowledge of it, which must be item-specific.There may be arguments whether revenues from advertising, applied equally to space regardless of whether its contents are or are not infringing, are “directly attributable to” infringements, but in any 4 of 7 6/29/12 12:40 AM Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal... Real Time +3 posts this hour http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk-... Most Popular Lists Video Happiest Jobs In America The World's Billionaires Buffett, Bon Jovi Duet the right and ability to delete every single video on the whole site, or to just turn it off altogether. To say they have no “ability to control” infringing videos until they know that they are infringing is like saying I can’t control my appetite until I know the caloric content of my food. If I were Viacom, not that I want to be Viacom, I would tell my lawyers to appeal on the grounds that the district judge distorted the meaning of the statute here. After all, the court admitted that Google was working the system: From plaintiffs’ submissions on the motions, a jury could find that the defendants not only were generally aware of, but welcomed, copyright-infringing material being placed on their website. Such material was attractive to users, whose increased usage enhanced defendants’ income from advertisements displayed on certain pages of the website, with no discrimination between infringing and non-infringing content. Let The Creator Beware If Google can generate ad revenue by taking in every kind of content without distinction, and make money on the infringing attractions, then Google can “work the float,” and always have enough infringing content to keep its blood pressure up at the expense of copyright holders. The only way that content owners can act proactively is by implementing digital “fingerinting technology” through the “Claim Your Content” system that Google uses as its only screening mechanism. Fingerprinting your content is not, however, cheap. So what this opinion seems to announce is a doctrine of “Caveat Creator,” let the creator beware. Will The Real Free Speech Provider Please Stand Up? Please don’t take me for a copyright hawk, but this seems like a ruling that benefits a company that has made a habit of turning other people’s work into their payday, and is being encouraged to keep on doing it. Meanwhile, real free, nonprofit libraries that have no advertising revenue, are discouraged from putting the works in their archives on the Internet where scholars and researchers can use it for fair use purposes, because publishers do not respect the fair use protections of 17 USC 107 (the Library Exemption from copyright infringement liability). I am currently defending the American Buddha Online Library against a suit from Penguin, and although I won on jurisdictional grounds in New York District Court, Penguin appealed, and the Second Circuit court of appeals is now asking the New York State Appeals Court to take a look at the issues and see if something better can be worked out for Penguin by tweaking New York state law. I am doing this case pro bono, because I’ve been well acquainted with the director for many years, but few libraries have a handy intellectual property lawyer to handle their cases. So true freedom of speech on the Internet is getting suppressed by copyright lawsuits while Google gets to keep minting money by working the DMCA like a money pump. Nice work if you can get it. Called-out comment Reply + expand comment Don Lindell 1 week ago It’s my opinion that Carreon thought the 20k would be an easy pick and did not anticipate the response from The Oatmeal. Which is strange because The Oatmeal responded in the same manner as two years ago and escalated the argument into the court of public opinion. The court of public opinion abides in the hearts of its members. Anticipating it’s decisions is relatively straightforward if you understand the philosophy driving their behavior. In this case, Carreon bluffed and lost. The question is wether he truly intends to double down, a strategy that has it’s own name: The Streisand Effect. You can’t beat the house, you can’t fight city hall, don’t poke the mask of the ol’ Lone Ranger and you don’t piss off the internet. Called-out comment Reply 5 of 7 6/29/12 12:40 AM Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal... Real Time http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk-... Most Popular +3 posts this hour Lists Video Happiest Jobs In America The World's Billionaires Buffett, Bon Jovi Duet Inside Forbes The World's Most Powerful Celebrities - Forbes Justin Bieber, Jennifer Lopez and The Rock star in our latest Celebrity 100. Justin Bieber, Venture Capitalist: The Forbes Cover Story Homes Of The World's Most Powerful Celebrities The Rock is Kicking Ass and Saving Franchises Forbes Real-Time Billionaires Channels Affiliate Sites Data Partners Business 6 of 7 Company Info About Forbes Forbes Russia Publications Distributed by AT&T 6/29/12 12:40 AM Funnyjunk Lawyer Charles Carreon Isn't Afraid of The Oatmeal... Real Time +3 posts this hour http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/06/15/funnyjunk-... Most Popular Lists Video Happiest Jobs In America The World's Billionaires Buffett, Bon Jovi Duet Op/Ed Terms and Conditions Forbes China Thomson Reuters Leadership Privacy Statement Forbes India AdChoices Lifestyle Contact Us RealClear Politics Lists Sitemap RealClear Markets Help RealClear World Free Trial Issue Subscriber Services Buy Back Issues RealClear Sports 2012 Forbes.com LLC™ 7 of 7 All Rights Reserved 6/29/12 12:40 AM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?