State of California et al v. Trump et al

Filing 277

Consent ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related filed by State of California. Responses due by 3/9/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration and Exhibits A-B)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 3/3/2020)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

OAKLAND DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

STATE OF CALIFORNIA et. al.;

Case No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG

Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF STATES’
v.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT
MOTION TO RELATE CASES
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam,
as President of the United States of America Judge:
Jr.
et al.;
Trial Date:
None Set
Action Filed: February 18, 2019
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Pl. States’ Admin. Motion to Relate Cases (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)

1

On March 3, 2020, Plaintiff States filed an Administrative Consent Motion to Consider

2

Whether Cases Should Be Related. Having considered the papers and pleadings on file, the Court

3

GRANTS the Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related and

4

ORDERS that the following cases be related:

5

• State of California et al. v. Trump et al., Case No. 19-cv-872; and

6

• State of California et al. v. Trump et al., Case No. 20-cv-1563.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

DATED: ___________________________

10
11

Dated: __________________

12
__________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[Proposed] Order Granting Pl. States’ Admin. Motion to Relate Cases (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)