"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"
Filing
737
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel and Exhibits 1-10 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5 filed by Somtai Troy Charoensak, Mariana Rosen, Melanie Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in support thereof, # 2 Proposed Order regarding Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, # 3 Redacted Version of Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 4 Unredacted Version of Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 5 Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeny in Support of Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 6 Exhibit Redacted Version of Exhibits 1-10, # 7 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibits 1-4, # 8 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibits 6-10, # 10 Exhibit 11-14, # 11 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel)(Sweeney, Bonny) (Filed on 12/20/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST
16 LITIGATION
17
18
This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
902262_1
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Lead Case No. C-05-00037-YGR
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF
PLAINTIFFS’ DAUBERT MOTION TO
EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINION
TESTIMONY OF KEVIN M. MURPHY
AND ROBERT H. TOPEL AND EXHIBITS
1-10 UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL
L.R. 7-11 AND 79-5
1
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal portions of
2 Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert
3 H. Topel and Exhibits 1-10 attached to the Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in Support of
4 Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert
5 H. Topel.
6
7
Specifically, plaintiffs seek leave to file under seal:
Exhibit 1:
8
9
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
10
11
12
13
14
15
Exhibit 4:
Exhibit 5:
Exhibit 6:
Exhibit 7:
Exhibit 8:
Exhibit 9:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Exhibit 10:
Declaration of Jeffrey M. Wooldridge in Support of Plaintiffs’ Daubert
Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Robert H. Topel and Kevin
M. Murphy, dated December 20, 2013;
Declaration of Roger G. Noll on Liability and Damages, dated April 3, 2013;
Corrections to Declaration of Roger G. Noll on Liability and Damages, dated
May 31, 2013;
Rebuttal Declaration of Roger G. Noll on Liability and Damages, November
25, 2013;
Expert Report of Kevin M. Murphy (Amended), dated August 19, 2013;
Expert Report of Robert H. Topel (Amended), dated August 19, 2013;
Supplemental Declaration of Augustin Farrugia, dated July 2, 2013;
Relevant Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Professor Roger G. Noll,
taken December 18, 2013;
Relevant Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Robert Topel, Ph.D.,
taken November 8, 2013;
Relevant Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Kevin Murphy, Ph.D.,
taken November 12, 2013;
There being good cause shown based on the arguments presented in the motion, the pleadings
on file, and any other relevant matter, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File
Under Seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _________________________
23
____________________________________
THE HON. YVONNE GONZALES ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
902262_1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLTFS’ MOT TO FILE PORTIONS OF PLTFS’ DAUBERT MTE
CERTAIN OPINION TESTIMONY OF KEVIN M. MURPHY & ROBERT H. TOPEL & EXS. 1-10 - C-
05-00037-YGR
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?