"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 737

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel and Exhibits 1-10 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5 filed by Somtai Troy Charoensak, Mariana Rosen, Melanie Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in support thereof, # 2 Proposed Order regarding Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, # 3 Redacted Version of Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 4 Unredacted Version of Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 5 Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeny in Support of Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 6 Exhibit Redacted Version of Exhibits 1-10, # 7 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibits 1-4, # 8 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibits 6-10, # 10 Exhibit 11-14, # 11 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel)(Sweeney, Bonny) (Filed on 12/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST 16 LITIGATION 17 18 This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 902262_1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. C-05-00037-YGR CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’ DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINION TESTIMONY OF KEVIN M. MURPHY AND ROBERT H. TOPEL AND EXHIBITS 1-10 UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 AND 79-5 1 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal portions of 2 Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert 3 H. Topel and Exhibits 1-10 attached to the Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in Support of 4 Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert 5 H. Topel. 6 7 Specifically, plaintiffs seek leave to file under seal: Exhibit 1: 8 9 Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: 10 11 12 13 14 15 Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: Exhibit 6: Exhibit 7: Exhibit 8: Exhibit 9: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Exhibit 10: Declaration of Jeffrey M. Wooldridge in Support of Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Robert H. Topel and Kevin M. Murphy, dated December 20, 2013; Declaration of Roger G. Noll on Liability and Damages, dated April 3, 2013; Corrections to Declaration of Roger G. Noll on Liability and Damages, dated May 31, 2013; Rebuttal Declaration of Roger G. Noll on Liability and Damages, November 25, 2013; Expert Report of Kevin M. Murphy (Amended), dated August 19, 2013; Expert Report of Robert H. Topel (Amended), dated August 19, 2013; Supplemental Declaration of Augustin Farrugia, dated July 2, 2013; Relevant Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Professor Roger G. Noll, taken December 18, 2013; Relevant Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Robert Topel, Ph.D., taken November 8, 2013; Relevant Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Kevin Murphy, Ph.D., taken November 12, 2013; There being good cause shown based on the arguments presented in the motion, the pleadings on file, and any other relevant matter, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: _________________________ 23 ____________________________________ THE HON. YVONNE GONZALES ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 902262_1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLTFS’ MOT TO FILE PORTIONS OF PLTFS’ DAUBERT MTE CERTAIN OPINION TESTIMONY OF KEVIN M. MURPHY & ROBERT H. TOPEL & EXS. 1-10 - C- 05-00037-YGR -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?