"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 737

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel and Exhibits 1-10 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5 filed by Somtai Troy Charoensak, Mariana Rosen, Melanie Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in support thereof, # 2 Proposed Order regarding Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, # 3 Redacted Version of Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 4 Unredacted Version of Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 5 Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeny in Support of Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, # 6 Exhibit Redacted Version of Exhibits 1-10, # 7 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibits 1-4, # 8 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit Unredacted Version of Exhibits 6-10, # 10 Exhibit 11-14, # 11 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel)(Sweeney, Bonny) (Filed on 12/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST 16 LITIGATION 17 18 This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 902621_1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. C-05-00037-YGR CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINION TESTIMONY OF KEVIN M. MURPHY AND ROBERT H. TOPEL 1 Having considered Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of 2 Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, the opposition thereto by Defendant Apple, Inc., the 3 pleadings of record, and any further submissions or argument of counsel, the Court finds that there is 4 good reason to exclude certain opinion expert testimony of Defendant’s experts Kevin M. Murphy 5 and Robert H. Topel under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms, 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. 6 Ed. 469 (1993), and Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 7 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Exclude 8 Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel is GRANTED. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 DATED: _________________________ 11 ____________________________________ THE HON. YVONNE GONZALES ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 902621_1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINION TESTIMONY OF KEVIN M. MURPHY AND ROBERT H. TOPEL - C-05-00037-YGR -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?