"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 758

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike 750 filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal, # 2 Declaration of David Kiernan in Support of Motion to Seal, # 3 Exhibit 1 - 2 to Kiernan Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, # 4 Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (ECF No. 750) REDACTED, # 5 Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (ECF No. 750) UNREDACTED, # 6 Declaration of Kiernan in Support of Apple's Opposition, # 7 Exhibit 1 to Kiernan Declaration in Support of Apple's Opposition REDACTED, # 8 Exhibit 1 to Kiernan Declaration in Support of Apple's Opposition UNREDACTED, # 9 Proposed Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike)(Kiernan, David) (Filed on 1/27/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (State Bar No. 60359)
[e-mail]
Craig E. Stewart (State Bar No. 129530)
[e-mail]
David C. Kiernan (State Bar No. 215335)
[e-mail]
Amir Q. Amiri (State Bar No. 271224)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15

THE APPLE iPOD iTUNES ANTI-TRUST
LITIGATION.

16

Case No. C 05-00037-YGR
[CLASS ACTION]
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL

17
18
19

Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Seal and Apple’s Local Rule 79-5

20

response thereto, and having determined that public disclosure of the confidential information

21

described therein would harm defendant Apple Inc., and finding compelling reasons and good

22

cause to seal that information, see Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172,

23

1178-80 (9th Cir. 2006), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Apple’s Administrative Motion is

24

GRANTED.

25

Apple shall file under seal portions of its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the

26

Supplemental Report of Kevin Murphy and Robert Topel Dated December 20, 2013 (ECF No.

27

750) and the redacted exhibits to the declaration of David C. Kiernan in support thereof as

28

follows:
___

[Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 YGR

1
2

ECF No.

3
4
5

758-4

6
7
8
9
10
11

758-7

Title
Apple’s Opposition Brief to
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike.
 1:11; 1:14-15; 2:12-13; 3
(Exhibit 13c); 4:6-7; fn. 6; 5
(Exhibit JT-1c2); 6 (Exhibit
JT-2c2); 6:23-7:5; 8:24-25;
9:3-6.
Exhibit 1 to Kiernan Declaration in
Support of Apple’s Opposition
Brief.
 9:9-11:25.

Filed Under Seal/Redacted

Redacted

Redacted

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: ______________, 2014

12

By:
The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Judge

13
14
15

SFI-851022v1

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 YGR

-2-