Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Filing 128

Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 128

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

William H. Manning (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Jacob S. Zimmerman (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Aaron R. Fahrenkrog (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 612-339-4181 David E. Marder (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 800 Boylston Street, 25th Floor Boston, MA 02199 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 617-267-8288 John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) E-mail: [e-mail] Reed Smith LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants.

Case No. CV-08-0986-SI DECLARATION OF AARON R. FAHRENKROG IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF

Case No. CV-08-0986-SI

-1-

DECLARATION OF AARON R. FAHRENKROG
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

I, Aaron R. Fahrenkrog, do hereby declare as follows: 1. I am an associate with the law firm Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., and

am one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs in this action. I make all of the statements in this Declaration of my own personal knowledge and in accord with 28 U.S.C. § 1746. 2. (Cheng '990). 3. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,248,893 Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,559,990

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

(Sakamoto '893). 4. (Patel '830). 5. (Purcell '434). 6. Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,377,200 Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 5,623,434 Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 4,737,830

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

(Pedneau '200). 7. '879). 8. Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of 08/328,337 Office Action, Jan. Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879 (Orr

26, 1995 (relates to Cheng '990). 9. Attached as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of 08/328,337 Amendment, Apr.

27, 1995 (relates to Cheng '990). 10. Attached as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of 08/328,337 Appeal Brief, Sept.

27, 1995 (relates to Cheng '990). 11. Attached as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of 08/328,337 Amendment, Mar.

21, 1994 (relates to Cheng '990). 12. Attached as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of the opinion Oki Am., Inc. v.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., No. C 04-13171 CRB, 2006 WL 3290577 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2006) (relates to Patel '830). 13. Attached as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of 06/817,227 Amendment and -2DECLARATION OF AARON R. FAHRENKROG

Case No. CV-08-0986-SI