Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Filing 88

**POSTED IN ERROR/WRONG CASE** Reply to Opposition to Motion to Compel Compliance with Yahoo!'s Subpoena on Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati filed byL. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kaplan, Lee) (Filed on 3/27/2009) Modified on 4/4/2009 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1 [e-mail]

Lee L. Kaplan (Texas Bar No. 11094400) Kristen L. McKeever (Texas Bar No. 24030775) Raj Duvvuri (Texas Bar No. 24054185) (admitted pro hac vice)

2 [e-mail] 3 [e-mail]

4 Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, L.L.P. 5 Houston, TX 77002 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RESPONDENTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH YAHOO!'S SUBPOENA ON WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI CASE NO. CV09-80004 Misc.

700 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300 Telephone: [phone]

6 Facsimile: [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, Plaintiff v. GOOGLE, INC., YAHOO!, INC., IAC LYCOS, INC., Case No. CV09-80004 MISC Case No. 2:07-cv-511 (CE) EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RESPONDENTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH YAHOO!'S SUBPOENA ON WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

15 SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., AOL LLC, and
Defendants.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

[PROPOSED] ORDER For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT after reviewing Yahoo!'s Motion to Compel Compliance with Yahoo!'s Subpoena on Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, all Responses and Replies thereto, and the evidence presented, the Court finds that the Motion to Compel Compliance with Yahoo!'s Subpoena on Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati is DENIED. Dated: _____________________, 2009. By: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RESPONDENTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH YAHOO!'S SUBPOENA ON WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI CASE NO. CV09-80004 Misc.