Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
225
Declaration of Derek Walter In Support of Apple Inc.'s Motion to Compel (1) Discovery Relating to US Sales; (2) Documents Improperly Withheld on the Basis of Privilege; and (3) Inventor Depositions filed byApple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 3, # 3 Exhibit 5, # 4 Exhibit 6, # 5 Exhibit 7, # 6 Exhibit 9, # 7 Exhibit 10, # 8 Exhibit 15, # 9 Exhibit 22, # 10 Exhibit 24, # 11 Exhibit 28, # 12 Exhibit 29, # 13 Exhibit 30, # 14 Exhibit 31, # 15 Exhibit 32, # 16 Exhibit 33, # 17 Exhibit 36)(Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 5/31/2011)
EXHIBIT 28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Yitai Hu (SBN 248085) (yitai.hu@alston.com)
Sean P. DeBruine (SBN 168071) (sean.debruine@alston.com)
Elizabeth Rader (SBN 184963) (elizabeth.rader@alston.com)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
Two Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400
Palo Alto, California 94306
Telephone:
650-838-2000
Facsimile:
650-838-2001
T. Hunter Jefferson (admitted pro hac vice) (hunter.jefferson@alston.com)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
One Atlantic Center
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Telephone:
404-881-7333
Facsimile:
404-253-8863
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant.
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION’S SECOND
SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE, INC.’S FIRST
SET OF INTERROGATORIES [NOS. 1-17]
23
24
PROPOUNDING PARTY: APPLE, INC.
25
RESPONDING PARTY:
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
26
SET NUMBER:
ONE
27
28
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
Plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation (“Elan”) hereby supplements its objections and
2
responses to Defendant Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) First Set of Interrogatories To Elan Microelectronics
3
Corporation (“Interrogatories”) as follows:
GENERAL STATEMENTS AND OBJECTIONS
4
5
1.
Elan’s responses to Apple’s First Set of Interrogatories are based on Elan’s current
6
knowledge after a reasonable inquiry. Elan’s investigation with regard to the subject matter of this
7
action is ongoing, and Elan will supplement its responses and objections in accordance with Patent
8
Local Rules and applicable law. The following responses are provided without prejudice to Elan’s
9
right to introduce at hearing or trial any evidence that is subsequently discovered relating to proof of
10
currently known facts and to produce and introduce all evidence whenever discovered relating to the
11
proof of subsequently discovered material facts. The following objections and responses do not
12
constitute any admission by Elan as to the relevance, materiality, or admissibility into evidence of the
13
subject matter or facts contained in any interrogatory or in Elan’s response. Elan reserves its right to
14
refer to, conduct discovery with reference to, or offer into evidence any and all facts, and information
15
notwithstanding the initial responses and objections interposed herein, consistent with Patent Local
16
Rules and applicable law.
17
2.
Elan’s responses are made subject to and without waiver of:
a. Elan’s right to object on any ground (e.g., relevance, etc.) to the use of Elan’s
18
19
responses or any portion thereof in any proceedings, including this or any other
20
action; and
b. Elan’s right to object on any ground to any additional discovery requests that
21
may be served in this action.
22
23
3.
Any statement made herein of an intent to produce documents is not, and shall not be
24
deemed, an admission of any factual or legal contention contained in any individual Interrogatory, nor
25
that any particular documents exist or are relevant and admissible in this matter.
26
4.
In addition to any specific objections which may be made on an individual basis in the
27
separate responses set forth below, Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent that it
28
seeks to elicit information subject to and protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
1
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
product doctrine and/or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. Any inadvertent
2
disclosure of such information shall not be deemed a waiver of the attorney-client privilege, the work
3
product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or immunity.
4
5.
Elan objects to the Interrogatories, including without limitation the “Definitions” and
5
“Instructions” contained therein, to the extent that they seek to impose burdens or obligations upon
6
Elan beyond what is prescribed and/or required by applicable law and rules, including the Federal
7
Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Patent Local Rules.
8
9
6.
Elan objects to the Interrogatories to the extent that they seek discovery of information
related to any counterclaim which the Court has dismissed from this action. Elan will only provide
10
information relating to any counterclaims for patent infringement if and when Apple asserts cognizable
11
claims of patent infringement against Elan.
12
13
14
7.
Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information or
documents consisting of confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information of non-parties.
8.
Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information that is not
15
in Elan’s possession, custody, or control, or information that would be burdensome to locate, retrieve,
16
prepare, review, and/or produce, where such burden outweighs any material benefit the information
17
would have to the litigation.
18
19
20
9.
Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent that it contains any factual or
legal misrepresentations, or where they are vague and/or ambiguous.
10.
Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent that it is compound and
21
contains multiple subparts, and thus represents an improper attempt to circumvent the limits on
22
interrogatories imposed by the parties’ agreement and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
23
11.
These general objections are applicable to each and every one of the following specific
24
objections and responses, and failure to repeat an objection in response to a specific Interrogatory shall
25
not be deemed a waiver of the objection. Further, if Elan specifically repeats one or more of these
26
general objections in response to a specific Interrogatory, such specific response shall not be a waiver
27
of any other general objections.
28
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
2
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
12.
1
2
Elan’s discovery responses are subject to any present or future Protective Order in this
case.
3
GENERAL OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
4
Elan objects to Apple’s “Definitions” and “Instructions” set forth in Apple’s First Set of
5
6
Interrogatories as follows:
1.
Elan objects to the definition of “Elan,” “you,” and “your” as set forth in Definition 2 to
7
the extent that these terms are defined to include attorneys, consultants, and other categories of persons
8
who are not parties to the above-captioned matter. Elan understands the term “Elan” to mean Elan
9
Microelectronics Corporation, including its officers, directors, agents and representatives acting on its
10
behalf, excluding its attorneys and counsel and those acting on behalf of its attorneys and counsel.
11
Elan objects to any Interrogatory that purports to impose any obligation to obtain responsive
12
information from non-parties. Elan will undertake to disclose responsive information, as further
13
described below, that is located within the possession, custody, or control of Elan.
14
2.
Elan objects to the definition of “Elan Accused Products” as set forth in Definition 8 as
15
vague and ambiguous as the term “touch-sensitive input device” has not been defined and its meaning
16
is not clear on its face.
17
3.
Elan objects to the definitions of “Related Patents” as set forth in Definition 10 as
18
overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it encompasses all unpublished pending and
19
abandoned applications from or through which any of the Elan Patents-in-Suit claim priority, all
20
unpublished pending and abandoned applications that claim priority from or through any of the Elan
21
Patents-in-Suit, and all unpublished pending and abandoned applications of any foreign counterpart
22
patents or patent applications of any of the foregoing. Elan objects to the definitions as they are used to
23
seek information that is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of
24
admissible evidence.
25
4.
Elan objects to the definition of “Communication” as set forth in Definition 11 as
26
overbroad. Elan also objects to this definition as vague and ambiguous with respect to the term, “any
27
other medium,” which prevents Elan from reasonably ascertaining the meaning and scope of the term
28
“Communication.”
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
3
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
5.
Elan objects to the various definitions of the terms “identify,” “identity,” and
“identification” as set forth in Definition 13 as overbroad, unduly burdensome and oppressive.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES
3
4
INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
5
Separately for each claim of the Elan Patents-in-Suit, describe in detail the conception and
reduction to practice of the claimed invention and any acts of diligence, including the dates on which
Elan contends the claimed invention was conceived and reduced to practice and each person and all
documents that can corroborate such conception, reduction to practice and/or diligence.
6
7
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
8
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
9
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
10
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
11
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
12
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
13
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
14
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present
15
claim or defense in this matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
16
evidence. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory as premature because it seeks a response relating to
17
infringement contentions before the time specified for such contentions under the Court’s rules and
18
schedule.
19
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan contends that the inventions
20
claimed in the ‘352 patent were conceived of and reduced to practice no later than January 4, 1996
21
when the original application that led to the ‘352 patent was filed. Elan believes that the claimed
22
inventions were conceived of and possibly reduced to practice before that date. Elan reserves the right
23
to supplement its response based on any additional information obtained from further investigation or
24
discovery in this matter, including documents or testimony obtained from Apple’s subpoenas to
25
Logitech, Inc. or Mr. Stephen Bisset.
26
Regarding the ‘353 patent, Elan contends that the claimed inventions were reduced to practice
27
on April 2, 2003 with the filing of Taiwan priority patent application 92205217 U. Elan contends that
28
the claimed inventions were conceived of prior to that date, but Elan is not currently able to establish a
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
4
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
precise date of conception. Elan’s investigation and discovery are ongoing, and Elan reserves its right
2
to supplement this response. Apple can ascertain the information responsive to Interrogatory No. 1 in
3
the business records labeled ELN015382 through ELN015384 previously produced by Elan. Elan is
4
aware of no further documents responsive information within its possession or control regarding the
5
‘353 patent, and none of the inventors of the ‘353 patent are currently employed by Elan.
6
INTERROGATORY NO. 2:
7
Separately for each claim of the Elan Patents-in-Suit, identify the individual and/or individuals
that Elan contends conceived the subject matter of that claim or participated in the reduction to practice
of the subject matter of that claim, including the subject matter he or she contributed to that claim or
the contribution of that individual to the reduction to practice of that claim, including a full description
of all facts and circumstances (including documents and persons with knowledge) and reasons
supporting such contention.
8
9
10
11
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 2:
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present
claim or defense in this matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory as premature because it seeks a response relating to
infringement contentions before the time specified for such contentions under the Court’s rules and
schedule.
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that each of the asserted
23
24
25
26
27
28
claims of the ‘352 patent was conceived and reduced to practice by Stephen J. Bisset and Bernard
Kasser of Palo Alto and Menlo Park, California, respectively, while employed at Logitech, Inc. of
Fremont, California, during a period of time ending no later than January 4, 1996. Other than the ‘352
patent application, Elan is not aware of documents or information within its possession or control,
acquired from Logitech or otherwise, relating to the conception and reduction to practice of the ‘352
patent.
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
5
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
Elan responds that the ‘353 patent was conceived and reduced to practice by Yen-Chang
2
(“Godwin”) Chiu, Yung-Lieh (“Kelvin”) Chien, Shich-Chi (“Edward”) Lin, and Ting-Hao Yeh, all of
3
Taiwan, R.O.C., while employed at Elan, during a period of time ending no later than April 2, 2003.
4
Other than the patent application filed in Taiwan, Elan is not aware of documents or information within
5
its possession or control relating to the conception and reduction to practice of the ‘353 patent.
6
INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
7
Separately for each claim of the Elan Patents-in-Suit, identify the first written description, first
offer for sale, first sale, first public disclosure, first public use, and first disclosure to another of the
claimed invention, including, without limitation, the date on which such event occurred, the identity of
each person with knowledge of any of the foregoing and the identity of all documents relating to the
foregoing.
8
9
10
11
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
12
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
13
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
14
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
15
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
16
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
17
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as premature because it seeks a response relating to infringement
18
contentions before the time specified for such contentions under the Court’s rules and schedule.
19
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it obtained its
20
present rights and interests in U.S. Patent No. 5,825,352 (“the ‘352 Patent”) on September 23, 2003
21
from K-Tech Devices. Elan understands that a first offer for sale, sale, public disclosure, public use or
22
disclosure to another occurred before Elan obtained any interest in the ‘352 Patent. After a reasonable
23
search, Elan is not aware of any information in its possession, custody, or control describing a first
24
offer for sale, sale, public disclosure, public use or disclosure of the ‘352 patent. With respect to U.S.
25
Patent No. 7,274,353 (“the ‘353 Patent”), Elan responds that it has not sold, offered for sale or publicly
26
used a product embodying an invention claimed in the patent. The first disclosure occurred with the
27
filing of the underlying patent application.
28
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
6
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
INTERROGATORY NO. 4:
2
Identify all Prior Art to the Elan Patents-in-Suit that Elan is aware of, and describe in detail
when, by whom and under what circumstances such Prior Art was discovered or identified.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 4:
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it is aware of prior
art references relating to the ‘352 Patent which are identified on the face of the patent. With respect to
the ‘352 Patent, Elan is also aware that Apple has identified additional alleged prior art in its invalidity
contentions served in the present litigation and that Synaptics, Inc. identified alleged additional prior
art in its invalidity contentions served during the previous litigation, which Elan has previously
produced to Apple. Elan further responds that it is aware of prior art references relating to the ‘353
Patent which are identified on the face of the patent. With respect to the ‘353 Patent, Elan is also
aware that Apple has identified additional alleged prior art in its invalidity contentions served in the
present litigation. Elan is presently unaware of any actual or alleged prior art relating to the ‘352
Patent or the ‘353 Patent which is not identified in these documents.
INTERROGATORY NO. 5:
Separately for each Elan Patent-in-Suit, state whether Elan contends that it has satisfied the
marking requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287, and if so, describe in detail all facts and circumstances
supporting or otherwise relating to that contention (including documents and persons with knowledge).
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5:
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by
28
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
7
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege,
2
immunity, or protection.
3
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that as early as May,
4
2006, Elan started marking the patent number of the ‘352 Patent, among other patents, on the boxes in
5
which it ships its touch-sensitive input devices practicing the ‘352 Patent. See ELN017263-
6
ELN017264. Also see ELN120369, ELN120371-ELN120374. Further, Elan placed the same on the
7
user interface window on or about April 2008. See ELN120367-ELN120368.
8
INTERROGATORY NO. 6:
9
Separately for each Elan Patent-in-Suit, state the date on which Elan contends that Apple first
became aware of that patent (whether through actual or constructive notice) and describe in detail all
facts and circumstances supporting or otherwise relating to that contention (including documents and
persons with knowledge).
10
11
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 6:
12
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
13
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
14
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
15
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by
16
the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege,
17
immunity, or protection. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information
18
that is in Apple’s possession or equally available to Apple.
19
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it understands that
20
at least one individual involved in the prosecution of Apple’s U.S. Patent No. 7,561,146 (“the ‘146
21
Patent”) was aware of the ‘352 Patent at least as early as August 25, 2004, when an Information
22
Disclosure Statement filed as part of the prosecution of the ‘146 Patent identified the ‘352 Patent as
23
prior art. Apple has acknowledged and admitted that it was aware of the ‘352 Patent at least as early as
24
August 25, 2004. Elan also responds that Apple was notified of its infringement of the ‘352 patent in a
25
letter dated August 27, 2006 from Daisuke Shudo, the General Manager of Elantech Devices
26
Corporation (See ELN126440) and in a letter dated October 16, 2006 from Ming-Tao Yang, Esq. (See
27
ELN126442). Elan further responds that Apple became aware of the ‘353 Patent at least as early as
28
April, 7, 2009, the date of the filing of this lawsuit and service of the Complaint on Apple.
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
8
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
INTERROGATORY NO. 7:
2
Describe in detail all facts and circumstances relating to each communication between Elan and
any third party concerning licensing, contracts, agreements, covenants not to sue, settlement
agreements, actual or potential infringement, invalidity, or unenforceability of any of the Patents-inSuit and the identities of all such third parties, including, but not limited to, the identity of each entity
contacted by Elan regarding any of the Elan Patents-in-Suit and each license granted, obtained, or
offered by Elan to any of the Elan Patents-in-Suit.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 7:
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks “each
communication between Elan and any third party.” Elan further objects to this Interrogatory to the
extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this matter and not
reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects to this
Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information containing proprietary or confidential information of
Elan or a non-party. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information
protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any
other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that Elan and
Synaptics, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement with respect to ‘352 Patent in October 2008. Elan
further states that Elan and Synaptics were engaged in litigation concerning, inter alia, Synaptics’
infringement of the ‘352 patent. That litigation also involved Prostar Computer, Inc. and Averatec, Inc.
The pleadings and correspondence between the parties have been produced to Apple. Elan objects to
the request that it “describe in detail each communication” between Elan and Synaptics, Prostar or
Averatec during that litigation as unduly burdensome.
Elan further responds that Elan had at least the following communications concerning Elan’s
‘352 patent:
Communications with Richard Wooley of Cirque Corporation concerning Cirque’s
GlidePoint® touchpad with so-called Advanced Gestures, through Elan’s outside
counsel Alston & Bird, beginning during or around July 6, 2009. See ELN126472.
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
9
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
A letter to Mary E. Doyle of Palm, Inc. concerning Palm’s Palm Pre smart phone,
2
through Elan’s outside counsel Alston & Bird, during or around July 6, 2009. See
3
ELN126471. That letter was followed by a telephone conversation between Sean
4
DeBruine, counsel for Elan, and Douglass Luftman, Palm’s Assistant General Counsel.
5
Communications with Charles Chamas and Anthony Baca of Hewlett-Packard
6
Company, through Elan’s outside counsel Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
7
(“Akin Gump”), beginning during or around January 4, 2007. Mr. Baca and Mr.
8
DeBruine also had at least one telephone conversation. See ELN126444.
9
Communications with Tsuneo Toda of Toshiba Corporation concerning certain Toshiba
10
laptop products, through Elan’s outside counsel Akin Gump, beginning during or
11
around January 4, 2007. See ELN126446. ELN126451, and ELN126454.
12
Elan further responds that it has had no license discussions regarding the ‘353 Patent.
13
14
INTERROGATORY NO. 8:
15
17
Describe in detail all facts and circumstances supporting or otherwise relating to Elan’s
calculation of damages allegedly resulting from Apple’s alleged infringement, including, but not
limited to, the type and dollar amount of damages and the method(s) and calculation(s) used to
compute that calculation of damages, including a full description of all facts (including documents and
persons with knowledge) and reasons supporting such contention.
18
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 8:
16
19
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
20
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
21
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
22
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
23
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
24
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
25
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as improper as the subject is expert witness testimony. Elan
26
further objects to this Interrogatory as premature because the early stage of this lawsuit and the
27
discovery and investigation are ongoing.
28
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
10
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it has yet to
2
calculate and quantify fully the damages it has suffered and continues to suffer because of Apple’s
3
infringement of the ‘352 Patent and the ‘353 Patent. Elan further responds that it will retain an expert
4
to determine the amount of damages to which Elan is entitled. Elan will disclose the opinions of its
5
expert pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) at the appropriate time under the schedule adopted by the
6
Court in this matter.
7
INTERROGATORY NO. 9:
8
Describe in detail all facts and circumstances supporting or otherwise relating to Elan’s
contention that Apple has willfully infringed or is willfully infringing the Elan Patents-in-Suit,
including a full description of all facts (including documents and persons with knowledge) and reasons
supporting such contention.
9
10
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 9:
11
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
12
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
13
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
14
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
15
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
16
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
17
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as premature because the early stage of this lawsuit and the
18
discovery and investigation are ongoing.
19
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that Apple has admitted
20
in its September 8, 2009 response to Elan’s Interrogatory No. 9 that it was aware of the ‘352 Patent as
21
early as August 25, 2004. On August 27, 2006, Elan notified Apple that its product infringed the ‘352
22
Patent. Notwithstanding its knowledge of Elan’s patent rights and its infringement of those rights.
23
Apple continues to use the patented technology with existing and new products even after Elan
24
informed Apple of infringement. Apple acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its action
25
constituted infringement of a valid patent. Moreover, Apple actually knew, or should have known, that
26
its actions constituted infringement of a valid and enforceable patent. Regarding the ‘353 Patent,
27
Apple’s infringement has been willful since at least April 7, 2009, the date on which Elan filed this
28
lawsuit and served the Complaint on Apple.
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
11
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
INTERROGATORY NO. 10:
2
Separately for each of the Elan Patents-in-Suit, state the date on which Elan contends that
Apple’s alleged infringement of that patent began and the date on which Elan first became aware of
such infringement, and explain in detail why Elan did not commence this action against Apple between
the date Elan became so aware and April 2009.
3
4
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 10:
5
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
6
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
7
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
8
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
9
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
10
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
11
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that Elan currently
12
understands that Apple’s infringement began with the introduction of the PowerBook G4 in February
13
2005 which used a method for sensing the contact of multiple fingers on a touchpad. Elan learned of
14
that infringement shortly before contacting Apple on August 27, 2006 about Apple’s infringement.
15
Elan brought this suit after the conclusion of its litigation involving the ‘352 Patent against Synaptics,
16
Inc. and after the parties’ ongoing negotiations failed to conclude with Apple’s purchase of a license
17
from Elan. With respect to the ‘353 Patent, Elan first learned of Apple’s infringement shortly before
18
filing this lawsuit against Apple on April, 7, 2009.
19
INTERROGATORY NO. 11:
20
21
22
23
24
25
Separately for each of the Apple Patents-in-Suit, describe in detail the facts and circumstances
relating to Elan’s first awareness of the patent, including inter alia, the date Elan first became aware of
the existence of the patent, the person(s) who first became aware of the patent, the circumstances
surrounding Elan’s first awareness of the patent, the content of any related communications or
documents and any actions taken by you as a result (including documents and persons with
knowledge).
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 11:
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
26
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
27
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
28
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
12
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this
2
matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects
3
to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
4
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
5
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it currently
6
understands that Nick Lin, a patent engineer in Elan’s Legal and IPR department prepared summaries
7
of the ‘218 and ‘659 patents on or about September, 24, 2008 and February 26, 2009, respectively.
8
Nick Lin uploaded the ‘218 patent summary onto Elan’s document management system, and internally
9
circulated the ‘659 patent summary to Chairman Yeh, the legal department and the research and
10
development department. Elan was not aware of Apple’s ‘218 patent or ‘659 patent before Mr. Lin
11
prepared the respective reports.
12
INTERROGATORY NO. 12:
13
Identify (by product name, including all trade names and designations, internal names, and
names during development; part number; model; manufacturer; designer; supplier; and dates first sold
or offered for sale) all products or designs of all touch-sensitive input devices or touch pads designed,
marketed, made, used, sold, offered for sale, imported, exported, licensed, or distributed by or for Elan.
14
15
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 12:
16
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
17
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
18
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
19
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan also objects to this
20
Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this
21
matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects
22
to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
23
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
24
Elan further objects to this Interrogatory as vague and ambiguous with respect to the term “touch25
sensitive input devices” as the term has not been defined and its meaning is not clear on its face.
26
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan understands the following products and
27
the products listed in the below table to be touch-sensitive input devices or touchpads:
28
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
13
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
Elan’s TP3 touch pads have the following part numbers: 804262-0000, 804262-0001, 8042620020, 814262-0000, and 814262-0001.
3
Elan’s KTP3 touch pads have the following part numbers: 800306-2301, 800306-2401,
4
800306-5201, 800306-5411, 800306-5431, 800306-5441, 800307-5100, 800311-1103, 800401-5003,
5
800401-5103, 800406-0803, 800406-1803, 800406-1813, 800406-1823, 800406-1833, 800406-1843,
6
800406-1863, 800406-1873, 800410-3012, 800410-3032, 810306-2301, 810306-5411, 810306-5431,
7
810306-5451, 810306-5461, 810307-5100, 810308-5202, 810308-5212, 810310-5022, 810311-1103,
8
810406-0803, 810406-1853, 810406-5053, 810410-3012, and 810410-3042.
9
Elan’s KTP5 touch pads have the following part numbers: 800406-1603, 800406-1612,
10
800409-5003, 800409-5103, 800409-5303, 800409-5503, 800410-2001, 800410-5001, 800504-2602,
11
800505-1003, 810406-1603, 810409-1112, 810409-1122, 810409-5103, 810409-5202, 810409-5603,
12
810410-5001, 810410-5021, 810504-2602, 810505-1003, 810509-2703, 810509-3001, 810509-5001,
13
810511-0702, 810511-0901, 810511-0911, 810511-0921, 810511-5002, 810512-0102, 810512-0102
14
V01, 810512-0112, 810512-0112 V01, 810512-0122, and 810602-1703.
15
Elan’s KTP6 touch pads have the following part numbers: 810506-1701, 810507-0703,
16
810507-0803, 810507-2100, 810508-0900, 810508-1600, 810508-1708, 810509-0900, 810509-2800,
17
800507-0703, 800507-0803, 800507-5003, 800507-5103, and 810604-1000.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
emno
BI026P-J21N501U
BI030G-T88MJ01U
BI030G-T88X401U
BI032G-C05M501U
BI032G-C06MB01U
BI032G-C07M501U
BI032G-C08M501U
BI032G-T02MB01U
BI032G-T02MB01U
BI032G-T02MB01U
BI032G-T02MB01U
BI032G-T02MB01U
BI032G-T02MB01U
BI032G-T02MB01U
ver
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JB
JC
JD
JE
JF
JG
LINE
ehno
SHI MKT126A
SHI MKT130A
SHI MKT133A
SHI MKT103A
SHI MKT097A
SHI MKT120A
SHI MKT127A
SHI MKT086A
SHI MKT086B
SHI MKT086C
SHI MKT086D
SHI MKT086E
SHI MKT086F
SHI MKT086G
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
14
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
pdname
BI026PJ211
BI030GT881
BI030GT881
BI032GC051
BI032C061
BI032GC071
BI032GC081
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
bodyname
BI026PJ211
BI030GT881
BI030GT881
BI032GC051
BI032C061
BI032GC071
BI032GC081
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
BI032GT021
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BI032G-T02MB01U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB02U
BI032G-T02MB03U
BI032G-T02MB03U
BI032G-T02MB04U
BI032G-T02MB04U
BI032G-T02MB04U
BI032G-T02MB04U
BI032G-T02MB04U
BI032G-T02MB05U
BI032G-T02MB05U
BI032G-T02MB05U
BI032G-T02MB06U
BI032G-T02MB06U
BI032G-T02MB06U
BI032G-T02MB06U
BI032G-T02MB06U
BI032G-T02MB06U
BI032G-T02MB07U
BI032G-T02MB07U
BI032G-T02MB08U
BI032G-T02MB09U
BI032G-T02MB09U
BI032G-T02MB10U
BI032G-T02MB11U
BI032G-T02MB11U
BI032G-T02MB12U
BI032G-T02MB13U
BI032G-T02MB13U
BI032G-T02MB14U
BI032G-T02MB15U
JH
JA
JB
JC
JD
JE
JF
JG
JH
JI
JA
JB
JA
JB
JC
JD
JE
JA
JB
JC
JA
JB
JC
JD
JE
JF
JA
JB
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
MKT086H
MKT088A
MKT088B
MKT088C
MKT088D
MKT088E
MKT088F
MKT088G
MKT088H
MKT088I
MKT096A
MKT096B
MKT099A
MKT099B
MKT099C
MKT099D
MKT099E
MKT101A
MKT101B
MKT101C
MKT111A
MKT111B
MKT111C
MKT111D
MKT111E
MKT111F
MKT115A
MKT115B
MKT116A
MKT117A
MKT117B
MKT119A
MKT147A
MKT147B
MKT122A
MKT125A
MKT125B
MKT151A
MKT153A
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
15
BI032GT021
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032T023
BI032GT023
BI032GT024
BI032GT024
BI032GT024
BI032GT024
BI032GT024
BI032GT025
BI032GT025
BI032GT025
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT027
BI032GT027
BI032GT028
BI032GT029
BI032GT029
BI032GT02A
BI032GT02D
BI032GT02D
BI032GT02B
BI032GT02C
BI032GT02C
BI032GT02F
BI032GT02G
BI032GT021
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032GT022
BI032T023
BI032T023
BI032GT024
BI032GT024
BI032GT024
BI032GT024
BI032GT024
BI032GT025
BI032GT025
BI032GT025
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT026
BI032GT027
BI032GT027
BI032GT028
BI032GT029
BI032GT029
BI032GT02A
BI032GT02D
BI032GT02D
BI032GT02B
BI032GT02C
BI032GT02C
BI032GT02F
BI032GT02G
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BI032G-T02MB16U
BI032G-T02MB17U
BI032G-T02MB18U
BI032G-T02MB19U
BI032G-T02MB20U
BI032G-T02MB21U
BI032G-T02MB22U
BI034G-T88M501U
BI034P-J21M501U
BI034P-J21M501U
BI034P-T88M501U
BI037G-JC1BB01U
BI037G-T03W401U
BI037G-T88W401U
BI038G-J21W201U
BI038G-J21W201U
BI038G-T88W401U
BI038G-T88WJ01U
BI046G-JC1AB01U
BI072G-JC1KB01U
BI101E-T88W701U
BI1030-M24EGAU
BI1050-M35CMAU
BI1050-M35TSBU
BI1050-M35TSCU
BI1050-M35TSEU
BI1051-M32AGAU
BI1051-M32AGAU
BI1051-M32AGAU
BI1051-M32EMAU
BI1051-M32EMAU
BI1051-M32EMAU
BI1051-M32HTBU
BI1051-M32HTBU
BI1051-M32HTBU
BI1051-M32HTBU
BI1051-M32HTBU
BI1051-M32HTBU
BI1051-M32HTBU
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
JA
JA
JB
JC
JA
JB
JC
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SF
SG
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
MKT154A
MKT155A
MKT150A
MKT156A
MKT157A
MKT159A
MKT160A
MKT112A
MKT106A
MKT106B
MKT114A
MKT165A
MKT123A
MKT144A
MKT141A
MKT141B
MKT138A
MKT135A
MKT161A
MKT163A
MKT148A
MKT020A
MKT066A
MKT054A
MKT058A
MKT100A
MKT090A
MKT090B
MKT090C
MKT085A
MKT085B
MKT085C
MKT081A
MKT081B
MKT081C
MKT081D
MKT081E
MKT081F
MKT081G
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
16
BI032GT02H
BI032GT02I
BI032GT02E
BI032GT02J
BI032GT02K
BI032GT02L
BI032GT02M
BI034GT885
BI034PJ211
BI034PJ211
BI034PT881
BI037GJC11
BI037GT031
BI037GT881
BI038GJ211
BI038GJ211
BI038GT881
BI038GT881
BI046GJC11
BI072GJC11
BI101ET881
BI1030EGA
BI1050CMA
BI1050TSB
BI1050TSC
BI1050TSE
BI1051AGA
BI1051AGA
BI1051AGA
BI1051EMA
BI1051EMA
BI1051EMA
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI032GT02H
BI032GT02I
BI032GT02E
BI032GT02J
BI032GT02K
BI032GT02L
BI032GT02M
BI034GT885
SC032HT4A
SC032HT4A
BI034PT881
BI037GJC11
BI037GT031
BI037GT881
TBI038GJ211
TBI038GJ211
BI038GT881
BI038GT881
BI046GJC11
BI072GJC11
BI101ET881
BI1030EGA
BI1050CMA
BI1050TSB
BI1050TSC
BI1051SNA
BI1051AGA
BI1051AGA
BI1051AGA
BI1051EMA
BI1051EMA
BI1051EMA
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BI1051-M32HTBU
BI1051-M32HTBU
BI1051-M35CMBU
BI1051-M35CMBU
BI1051-M35CMBU
BI1051-M35CMBU
BI1051-M35CMCU
BI1051-M35CMCU
BI1051-M35CMCU
BI1051-M35CMCU
BI1051-M35CMCU
BI1051-M40GMAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNAU
BI1051-M48SNBU
BI1051-M48SNBU
BI1051-M48SNBU
BI1051-M48SNBU
BI8250-M32CHAU
BI8250-M32CHAU
BI8250-M32CHAU
BI8250-M32CHBU
BI8250-M32CHBU
BI8250-M32CHBU
BI8250-M32CHCU
BI8250-M32CHCU
BI8250-M32CHCU
BI8250-S32ANHU
BI8250-S32ANHU
BI8251-M28WKAU
BI8251-M28WKAU
BI8256-M40BWBU
SX
SY
JA
JB
JC
JD
JA
JB
JC
JD
JE
JA
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SF
SG
SH
SK
SA
SB
SC
SD
JA
JB
JC
JA
JB
JC
JA
JB
JC
JA
JB
JB
JD
JA
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
MKT081X
MKT105A
MKT069A
MKT069B
MKT069C
MKT069D
MKT071A
MKT071B
MKT071C
MKT071D
MKT071E
MKT067A
MKT079A
MKT079B
MKT079C
MKT079D
MKT079E
MKT079F
MKT079G
MKT079H
MKT079K
MKT094A
MKT094B
MKT094C
MKT094D
MDT001A
MDT001B
MKT026A
MKT002A
MKT002B
MKT002C
MKT001A
MKT001B
MKT001C
MDT002A
MDT002B
MDT003A
MKT030A
MKT031A
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
17
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051CMB
BI1051CMB
BI1051CMB
BI1051CMB
BI1051CMC
BI1051CMC
BI1051CMC
BI1051CMC
BI1051CMC
BI1051GMA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNB
BI1051SNB
BI1051SNB
BI1051SNB
BI8250CHA
BI8250CHA
BI8250CHA1
BI8250CHB
BI8250CHB
BI8250CHB
BI8250CHC
BI8250CHC
BI8250CHC
BI8250S32
BI8250S32
BI8251M28
BI8251WKA
BI8256BWB
BI1051HTB
BI1051HTB
BI1051CMB
BI1051CMB
BI1051CMB
BI1051CMB
BI1051CMC
BI1051CMC
BI1051CMC
BI1051CMC
BI1051CMC
BI1051GMA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNA
BI1051SNB
BI1051SNB
BI1051SNB
BI1051SNB
BI8250CHA
BI8250CHA
BI8250CHA1
BI8250CHB
BI8250CHB
BI8250CHB
BI8250CHC
BI8250CHC
BI8250CHC
BI8250S32
BI8250S32
BI8251M28
BI8251WKA
BI8256BWB
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BI8256-M40BWBU
BI8256-M40TCAU
BI8256-S40AWGU
BI8256-S40AWHU
BI8256-S43AXGU
BI8256-S43AXHU
BI8258-M43CPAU
BI8258-M43EGAU
BI8261-M32CHAU
BT0101-DL001FU
BT0102-PD005PU
BT8210-EM001PU
BT8210-EM002PU
BT8210-EM003PU
BW8231-IA001FU
CB0000A-CM001AU
CB0000A-CM001AU
CB0000A-CM002AU
CB0000A-CM002AU
CB0000A-CM003AU
CB0000A-CM004AU
CB0000A-CM004AU
CB0000A-CM005AU
CB0000A-CM006AU
CB0000A-CP001AU
CB0000A-EM001AU
CB0102A-IA001AU
CB030G-K04MJ01U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
JB
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JC
SA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JB
JA
JB
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
SA
JA
JA
JA
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SF
SG
SH
SI
SJ
SK
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
MKT031B
MKT032A
MKT033A
MKT034A
MKT035A
MKT036A
MKT078A
MKT037A
MDT007A
B&S
MD1006A
B&S
B&S
B&S
MD2005A
MDT056A
MDT056B
MDT057A
MDT057B
MDT061A
MDT065A
MDT065B
MDT069A
MDT085A
B&S
MDT083A
MDT037A
MDT076A
MDT059A
MDT059B
MDT059B
MDT059D
MDT059E
MDT059F
MDT059G
MDT059G
MDT059I
MDT059J
MDT059G
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
18
BI8256BWB
BI8256TCA
BI8256AWG
BI8256AWH
BI8256AXG
BI8256AXH
BI8258CPA
BI8258EGA
BI8261M32
_BT0101
BT01028TT
_BT8210
_BT8210
_BT8210
BW8231IA1
CB0000CM1
CB0000CM1
CB0000CM2
CB0000CM2
CB0000CM3
CB0000CM4
CB0000CM4
CB0000CM5
CB0000CM6
_CB00CP1A
CB0000EM1
CB0102IA1
CB030K041
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
BI8256BWB
BI8256TCA
BI8256AWG
BI8256AWH
BI8256AXG
BI8256AXH
BI8258CPA
BI8258EGA
BI8261M32
B&S
BT01028TT
B&S
B&S
B&S
BW8231IA1
CB0000CM1
CB0000CM1
CM0000CM2
CM0000CM2
CB0000CM3
CB0000CM4
CB0000CM4
CB0000CM5
CB0000CM6
B&S
CB0000EM1
CB0102IA1
CB030K041
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X401U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X402U
CB043G-T01X403U
CB043G-T01X403U
CB043G-T01X403U
CB043G-T01X403U
CB043G-T01X403U
CB043G-T01X403U
CB043G-T01X403U
CB043G-T01X404U
CB043G-T01X404U
CB043G-T01X404U
CB043G-T01X404U
CB043G-T01X404U
CB043G-T01X404U
CB043G-T01X404U
CB043G-T01X405U
CB043G-T01X406U
CB043G-T01X408U
CB043G-T01X409U
CB043G-T01X410U
CB060G-T88N01AU
CB1030A-EG001AU
CB1050A-CM001AU
CB1050A-MV001AU
CB1050A-SN001AU
CB1050A-SN002AU
CB1050A-TS001AU
SL
SM
SN
SO
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SF
SG
SH
SZ
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SY
SZ
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SY
SZ
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
JA
JA
JB
JA
SA
SA
JB
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
MDT059G
MDT059J
MDT059J
MDT059O
MDT063A
MDT063B
MDT063C
MDT063D
MDT063E
MDT063D
MDT063E
MDT063H
MDT063A
MDT067A
MDT067B
MDT067C
MDT067C
MDT067E
MDT067B
MDT067A
MDT068A
MDT068B
MDT068C
MDT068C
MDT068E
MDT068B
MDT068A
MDT087A
MDT088A
MDT090A
MDT091A
MDT092A
MDT081A
MDT004A
MDT006B
MDT012A
MDT013A
MDT036A
MDT014B
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
19
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT011
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT015
CB043GT016
CB043GT018
CB043GT019
CB043GT01A
CB060GT881
CB1030EG1
CB1050CM1
CB1050MV1
CB1050SN1
CB1050SN2
CB1050TS1
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB1051HT3
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT012
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT013
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT014
CB043GT015
CB043GT016
CB043GT018
CB043GT019
CB043GT01A
CB060GT881
CB1030EG1
CB1050CM1
CB1050MV1
CB1050SN1
CB1050SN2
CB1050TS1
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CB1050A-TS002AU
CB1050A-TS002AU
CB1050A-TS003AU
CB1051A-AG001AU
CB1051A-CM002AU
CB1051A-CM002AU
CB1051A-CM002AU
CB1051A-CM003AU
CB1051A-CM003AU
CB1051A-CM003AU
CB1051A-CM004AU
CB1051A-CM004AU
CB1051A-CM004AU
CB1051A-CM004AU
CB1051A-CM004AU
CB1051A-CM004AU
CB1051A-CM004AU
CB1051A-CM004AU
CB1051A-CM005AU
CB1051A-CM006AU
CB1051A-DT001AU
CB1051A-EM001AU
CB1051A-EM001AU
CB1051A-EM001AU
CB1051A-EM003AU
CB1051A-GM001AU
CB1051A-HT001AU
CB1051A-HT002AU
CB1051A-HT002AU
CB1051A-HT002AU
CB1051A-HT002AU
CB1051A-HT002AU
CB1051A-IA001AU
CB1051A-IA001AU
CB1051A-IA001AU
CB1051A-IA001AU
CB1051A-IA001AU
CB1051A-IA001MT
CB1051A-MV002AU
JA
JB
JA
JA
JA
JB
JC
JA
JB
JC
JA
JB
JC
JD
JE
JF
JG
JH
JB
JA
JA
JA
JB
JC
JA
JA
SA
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
JA
JB
JC
JD
JE
JA
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
MDT039A
MDT039B
MDT060A
MDT062A
MDT045A
MDT045B
MDT045C
MDT046A
MDT046B
MDT046C
MDT055A
MDT055A
MDT055C
MDT055D
MDT055E
MDT055E
MDT055E
MDT055E
MDT070B
MDT086A
MDT071A
MDT053A
MDT053B
MDT053C
MDT066A
MDT044A
MDT047A
MDT052A
MDT052B
MDT052C
MDT052D
MDT052E
MDT054A
MDT054B
MDT054C
MDT054D
MDT054E
B&S
MDT051A
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
20
CB1050TS2
CB1050TS2
CB1050TS3
CB1051AG1
CB1051CM2
CB1051CM2
CB1051CM2
CB1051CM3
CB1051CM3
CB1051CM3
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051ACM5
CB1051CM6
CB1051DT1
CB1051EM1
CB1051EM1
CB1051EM1
CB1051EM3
CB1051GMA
CB1051HT1
CB1051HT2
CB1051HT2
CB1051HT2
CB1051HT2
CB1051HT2
CB1051IA1
CB1051IA1
CB1051IA1
CB1051IA1
CB1051IA1
_CB1051A
CB1051MV2
CB1050TS2
CB1050TS2
CB1051SN1
CB1051AG1
CB1051CM2
CB1051CM2
CB1051CM2
CB1051CM3
CB1051CM3
CB1051CM3
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051CM4
CB1051ACM5
CB1051CM6
CB1051DT1
CB1051EM1
CB1051EM1
CB1051EM1
CB1051EM3
CB1051GMA
CB1051HT1
CB1051HT2
CB1051HT2
CB1051HT2
CB1051HT2
CB1051HT2
CB1051IA1
CB1051IA1
CB1051IA1
CB1051IA1
CB1051IA1
B&S
CB1051MV2
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CB1051A-SH001AU
CB1051A-SH001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-SN001AU
CB1051A-TS002AU
CB1051A-TS002AU
CB1060A-AC001AU
CB1060A-EM001AU
CB1060A-EM002AU
CB1060A-EM003AU
CB1060A-EM004AU
CB1060A-EM005AU
CB1060A-MB001AU
CB1060A-MB002AU
CB1060A-MB003AU
CB1060A-MV001AU
CB1060A-SH001AU
CB1060A-SH002AU
CB1060A-SH003AU
CB1060A-SH003AU
CB8231A-AG001AU
CB8231A-AG002AU
CB8231A-HC002AU
CB8231A-IA001AU
CB8232A-LC001AU
CB8250A-CH001AU
CB8250A-M32CHAU
CB8250A-VG001AU
CB8250A-VG001AU
JA
JZ
SA
SB
SC
SD
SE
SF
SG
SH
SI
SJ
SK
SL
JA
JB
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
JB
JA
JA
JA
JA
JA
JB
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
MDT064A
MDT064A
MDT048A
MDT048B
MDT048B
MDT048B
MDT048E
MDT048E
MDT048I
MDT048J
MDT048I
MDT048J
MDT048K
MDT048K
MDT042A
MDT042B
MDT072A
MDT074A
MDT075A
MDT079A
MDT082A
MDT084A
MDT093A
MDT094A
MDT095A
MDT078A
MDT073A
MDT077A
MDT080A
MDT080B
MDT015A
MDT016A
MDT018B
MDT019A
MDT043A
MDT024A
MDT025A
MDT026A
MDT026B
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
21
CB1051SH1
CB1051SH1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051TS2
CB1051TS2
CB1060AC1
CB1060EMA
CB1060EM2
CB1060EM3
CB1060EM4
CB1060EM5
CB1060MB1
CB1060MB2
CB1060MB3
CB1052MV1
CB1060SH1
CB1060SH2
CB1060SH3
CB1060SH3
CB8231AG1
CB8231AG2
CB8231HC2
CB8231IA1
CB8232LC1
CB8250CH1
CB8250CHA
CB8250VG1
CB8250VG1
CB1051SH1
CB1051SH1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051SN1
CB1051TS2
CB1051TS2
CB1060AC1
CB1060EMA
CB1060EM2
CB1060EM3
CB1060EM4
CB1060EM5
CB1060MB1
CB1060MB2
CB1060MB3
CB1052MV1
CB1060SH1
CB1060SH2
CB1060SH3
CB1060SH3
CB8231AG1
CB8231AG2
CB8231HC2
CB8231IA1
CB8232LC1
CB8250CH1
CB8250CHA
CB8250VG1
CB8250VG1
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CB8250C-M32CHAU
CB8251B-WK001AU
CB8251B-WK001AU
CB8251C-WK001AU
CB8256A-BW002AU
CB8256A-BW002AU
CB8256A-TC001AU
CB8258A-EG001AU
CB8261A-CH001AU
KT1030-CO002GAQ
KT1030-ZP001GAQ
KT8120CW
KT8120CW
KT8120CW
KT8120CW
KT8120EW
KT8120H
KT8120KCW
KT8120KCW
KT8120KCW
KT8120KCW
831001-22X2
831001-23X2
eSK-R20-X
831001-23B2
831001-2332
831001-2342
831001-22B2
831001-2232
831001-2242
800306-2300
800306-2401
800306-2501
800306-2511
800306-5201
800306-5301
800306-5421
800306-5501
800307-5101
JB
JB
JD
JC
JA
JB
JA
JA
JC
JC
JC
JK
JQ
SK
SQ
SQ
XK
JK
JQ
SK
SQ
1
1
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
SHI
MDT027A
MDT029A
MDT029C
MDT030A
MDT031A
MDT031B
MDT032A
MDT033A
MDT034B
EG5792C
EG5792C
EJ5780C-028
EJ5780D-028
EJ5780C-028
EJ5780D-028
EJ5780D-028
EJ5780C-028
EJ5780C-028
EJ5780D-028
EJ5780C-028
EJ5780D-028
CB8250CHA1
CB8251WK11
CB8251WK11
CB8251WK12
CB8256BW2
CB8256BW2
CB8256TC1
CB8258EG1
CB8261CH1
EKTP1030
EKTP1030
EKT8120
EKT8120
EKT8120
EKT8120
EKT8120
EKT8120
EKT8120
EKT8120
EKT8120
EKT8120
CB8250CHA1
CB8251WK11
CB8251WK11
CB8251WK12
CB8256BW2
CB8256BW2
CB8256TC1
CB8258EG1
CB8261CH1
EKTP1030
EKTP1030
EKT0101
EKT0101
EKT0101
EKT0101
EKT0101
EKT0101
EKT0101
EKT0101
EKT0101
EKT0101
A
A
A
A
A
A
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
831001
831001
831001
831001
831001
831001
800306A
800306A
800306A
800306A
800306A
800306A
800306A
800306A
800307A
83100123B2
8310012332
8310012342
83100122B2
8310012232
8310012242
8003062300
8003062401
8003062501
8003062511
8003065201
8003065301
8003065421
8003065501
8003075101
83100123B2
83100123B2
83100123B2
83100123B2
83100123B2
83100123B2
8003065501
8003065501
8003065501
8003065501
8003065501
8003065501
8003065501
8003065501
8003075123
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
22
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
800307-5121
800307-5123
800308-5202
800308-5402
800310-1413
800310-1420
800310-5012
800310-5013
800311-1113
800401-5113
800406-1612
800408-0902
800408-1308
800409-1103
800409-1113
800409-5002
800409-5503
800410-3002
800410-3003
800410-5101
800411-1702
800412-2002
800412-2102
800504-0603
800505-1003 V01
800507-0703
800507-0803
800507-5003
800507-5103
810508-1708
810509-0900
810509-2703
810509-2800
810509-3001
810511-0713
810511-0901 V01
810511-0911 V01
810511-0921 V01
810511-5013
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
800307A
800307A
800308A
800308A
800310A
800310A
800310A
800310A
800311A
800401A
800406A
800408A
800408A
800409A
800409A
800409A
800409A
800410A
800410A
800410A
800411A
800412A
800412A
800504A
800505A
800507A
800507A
800507A
800507A
810508A
810509A
810509A
810509A
810509A
810511A
810511A
810511A
810511A
810511A
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
23
8003075121
8003075123
8003085202
8003085402
8003101413
8003101420
8003105012
8003105013
8003111113
8004015113
8004061612
8004080902
8004081308
8004091103
8004091113
8004095002
8004095503
8004103002
8004103003
8004105101
8004111702
8004122002
8004122102
8005040603
8005051003
8005070703
8005070803
8005075003
8005075103
8105081708
8105090900
8105092703
8105092800
8105093001
8105110713
8105110901
8105110911
8105110921
8105115013
8003075123
8003075123
8003085402
8003085402
8003105013
8003105013
8003105013
8003105013
8003111113
8004015233
8004061873
8004081308
8004081308
8004095503
8004095503
8004095503
8004095503
8004105101
8004105101
8004105101
8004111702
8004122102
8004122102
8005042602
8005051003
8005075103
8005075103
8005075103
8005075103
8105081708
8105095201
8105095201
8105095201
8105095201
8105115013
8105115013
8105115013
8105115013
8105115013
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
810512-0112 V01
810512-0122 V01
810512-5012
810602-1703
810604-1000
810607-3103
810607-3113
810607-3123
810607-3133
810607-5003
810607-5013
810608-5312
810608-5402
810608-5402V
810609-0503
810610-0102 V01
810610-0302 V01
810610-0302 V02
810610-2102
810612-1902
810701-0500
810701-1503
810701-5013
810701-5100
810701-5110
810701-5202
810702-1524
810702-1534
810702-2401
810706-0423
810706-0523
810706-0533
810706-0543
810706-0623
810708-2002
810708-3003
810708-3013
810708-3023
810708-3103
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
810512A
810512A
810512A
810602A
810604A
810607A
810607A
810607A
810607A
810607A
810607A
810608A
810608A
810608A
810609A
810610A
810610A
810610A
810610A
810612A
810701A
810701A
810701A
810701A
810701A
810701A
810702A
810702A
810702A
810706A
810706A
810706A
810706A
810706A
810708A
810708A
810708A
810708A
810708A
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
24
8105120112
8105120122
8105125012
8106021703
8106041000
8106073103
8106073113
8106073123
8106073133
8106075003
8106075013
8106085312
8106085402
8106085402
8106090503
8106100102
8106100302
8106100302
8106102102
8106121902
8107010500
8107011503
8107015013
8107015100
8107015110
8107015202
8107021524
8107021534
8107022401
8107060423
8107060523
8107060533
8107060543
8107060623
8107082002
8107083003
8107083013
8107083023
8107083103
8105125012
8105125012
8105125012
8106021703
8106041000
8106075013
8106075013
8106075013
8106075013
8106075013
8106075013
8106085402
8106085402
8106085402
8106090503
8106102102
8106102102
8106102102
8106102102
8106121902
8107015202
8107015202
8107015202
8107015202
8107015202
8107015202
8107022401
8107022401
8107022401
8107062104
8107062104
8107062104
8107062104
8107062104
8107083103
8107083103
8107083103
8107083103
8107083103
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
810709-2703
810710-0403
810710-0413
810711-1201
810711-5002
810711-5012
810711-5102
810711-5112
810712-2102
810712-2402
810712-5002
810712-5002V
810712-5003
810712-5012
810712-5022
810801-0603
810801-0613
810801-0643
810801-1703
810801-1713
810801-1733
810801-1743
810802-2213
810802-2223
810802-2233
810802-2243
810802-2253
810804-3003
810804-3013
810804-3023
814262-0000
814262-0001
820006-0200
820006-0201
820006-0202
820006-0203
820006-0204
820006-0205
820009-1100
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
810709A
810710A
810710A
810711A
810711A
810711A
810711A
810711A
810712A
810712A
810712A
810712A
810712A
810712A
810712A
810801A
810801A
810801A
810801A
810801A
810801A
810801A
810802A
810802A
810802A
810802A
810802A
810804A
810804A
810804A
814262A
814262A
820006A
820006A
820006A
820006A
820006A
820006A
820009A
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
25
8107092703
8107100403
8107100413
8107111201
8107115002
8107115012
8107115102
8107115112
8107122102
8107122402
8107125002
8107125002
8107125003
8107125012
8107125022
8108010603
8108010613
8108010643
8108011703
8108011713
8108011733
8108011743
8108022213
8108022223
8108022233
8108022243
8108022253
8108043003
8108043013
8108043023
8142620000
8142620001
8200060200
8200060201
8200060202
8200060203
8200060204
8200060205
8200091100
8107092703
8107100413
8107100413
8107115112
8107115112
8107115112
8107115112
8107115112
8107122102
8107122102
8107122102
8107122102
8107122102
8107122102
8107122102
8108010643
8108010643
8108010643
8108010643
8108010643
8108010643
8108010643
8108022253
8108022253
8108022253
8108022253
8108022253
8108043023
8108043023
8108043023
8142620001
8142620001
8200060205
8200060205
8200060205
8200060205
8200060205
8200060205
8200091100
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
830711-2304
830801-0704
840808-1301
840808-1301 V01
840808-1311 V01
840808-1321 V01
840809-0402
840809-0403
840809-0412
840809-0413
840809-0422
900305-2601
901688-0003
901689-0005
902158-0000
902159-0000
902159-0001
902159-0100
904255-0002
904255-0003
904255-0004
904255-0005
904284-0000
904300-0000
904308-0000
904315-0000
904318-0000
904335-0000
904339-0000
904340-0000
904341-0000
904343-0000
904345-0000
C46367-B300
C46367-B301
C5440D-3100
C6536C-0300
C6536E-4300
C6740D-3200
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
830711A
830801A
840808A
840808A
840808A
840808A
840809A
840809A
840809A
840809A
840809A
900305A
901688A
901689A
902158A
902159A
902159A
902159A
904255A
904255A
904255A
904255A
904284A
904300A
904308A
904315A
904318A
904335A
904339A
904340A
904341A
904343A
904345A
C46367A
C46367A
C5440DA
C6536CA
C6536EA
C6740DA
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
26
8307112304
8308010704
8408081301
8408081301
8408081311
8408081321
8408090402
8408090403
8408090412
8408090413
8408090422
9003052601
9016880003
9016890005
9021580000
9021590000
9021590001
9021590100
9042550002
9042550003
9042550004
9042550005
9042840000
9043000000
9043080000
9043150000
9043180000
9043350000
9043390000
9043400000
9043410000
9043430000
9043450000
C46367B300
C46367B301
C5440D3100
C6536C0300
C6536E4300
C6740D3200
8307112304
8308010704
8408081321
8408081321
8408081321
8408081321
8408090422
8408090422
8408090422
8408090422
8408090422
9003052601
9016880003
9016890005
9021580002
9021590100
9021590100
9021590100
9042550005
9042550005
9042550005
9042550005
9042840000
9043000000
9043080000
9043150000
9043180000
9043350000
9043390000
9043400000
9043410000
9043430000
9043450000
C46367B301
C46367B301
C5440D3100
C6536C0300
C6536E4300
C6740D3200
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C7737D-0100
C7737D-5200
C7737D-5300
C7740D-3201
C7740D-4200
C8048D-5200
C8048D-5201
C8048D-5300
C8048D-5301
C8048D-7300
E6032D-0100
E6034D-1100
E6740D-4200
E6740D-5100
E6740D-5200
E8033D-5000
E8033D-5100
E8048D-2200
E8442D-5100
E8442D-5101
E8442D-5200
E8450F-5101
L80452-5000
L80452-5001
L80452-5002
L80452-5003
L96542-5300
L96542-5301
L96542-5302
L96542-5303
S4833D-3201
S53406-B300
S5440D-3100
S6034C-1200
S6034D-1200
S6536D-3300
S6536E-4300
S65496-B300
S65496-B301
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
C7737DA
C7737DA
C7737DA
C7740DA
C7740DA
C8048DA
C8048DA
C8048DA
C8048DA
C8048DA
E6032DA
E6034DA
E6740DA
E6740DA
E6740DA
E8033DA
E8033DA
E8048DA
E8442DA
E8442DA
E8442DA
E8450FA
L80452A
L80452A
L80452A
L80452A
L96542A
L96542A
L96542A
L96542A
S4833DA
S53406A
S5440DA
S6034CA
S6034DA
S6536DA
S6536EA
S65496A
S65496A
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
27
C7737D0100
C7737D5200
C7737D5300
C7740D3201
C7740D4200
C8048D5200
C8048D5201
C8048D5300
C8048D5301
C8048D7300
E6032D0100
E6034D1100
E6740D4200
E6740D5100
E6740D5200
E8033D5000
E8033D5100
E8048D2200
E8442D5100
E8442D5101
E8442D5200
E8450F5101
L804525000
L804525001
L804525002
L804525003
L965425300
L965425301
L965425302
L965425303
S4833D3201
S53406B300
S5440D3100
S6034C1200
S6034D1200
S6536D3300
S6536E4300
S65496B300
S65496B301
C7737D5300
C7737D5300
C7737D5300
C7740D4200
C7740D4200
C8048D5201
C8048D5201
C8048D5201
C8048D5201
C8048D5201
E6032D0100
E6034D1100
E6740D5200
E6740D5200
E6740D5200
E8033D5000
E8033D5000
E8048D2200
E8442D5101
E8442D5101
E8442D5101
E8450F5101
L804525003
L804525003
L804525003
L804525003
L965425303
L965425303
L965425303
L965425303
S4833D3201
S53406B300
S5440D3100
S6034C1200
S6034D1200
S6536D3300
S6536E4300
S65496B301
S65496B301
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
S6740C-1100
S6740D-3200
S6740D-4300
S7737D-5300
S7737E-01H0
S7757F-5300
S7938D-5300
S80452-5000
S80452-5001
S80452-5002
S8048D-3200
S8048D-5201
S8048D-5300
S8442D-5100
S8442D-6100
S8644C-1200
S8744D-11H0
S8744E-01H0
S96542-5300
S96542-5301
S96542-5302
S9654D-5300
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
S6740CA
S6740DA
S6740DA
S7737DA
S7737EA
S7757FA
S7938DA
S80452A
S80452A
S80452A
S8048DA
S8048DA
S8048DA
S8442DA
S8442DA
S8644CA
S8744DA
S8744EA
S96542A
S96542A
S96542A
S9654DA
S6740C1100
S6740D3200
S6740D4300
S7737D5300
S7737E01H0
S7757F5300
S7938D5300
S804525000
S804525001
S804525002
S8048D3200
S8048D5201
S8048D5300
S8442D5100
S8442D6100
S8644C1200
S8744D11H0
S8744E01H0
S965425300
S965425301
S965425302
S9654D5300
S6740C1100
S6740D3200
S6740D3200
S7737D5300
S7737E01H0
S7757F5300
S7938D5300
S804525002
S804525002
S804525002
S8048D5300
S8048D5300
S8048D5300
S8442D5100
S8442D5100
S8644C1200
S8744D11H0
S8744E01H0
S965425302
S965425302
S965425302
S9654D5300
17
18
emno
19
20
ver
LINE
21
22
pdname
23
24
25
ehno
26
27
28
bodyname
Also known as part number or the product model number for the use of external
sales use.
Version
Product line
Also known as Elan number, the internal product designation. One Elan no. can have
multiple corresponding “emno” due to sales of by different sales department. One
Elan no. can also have multiple corresponding “ehno” due to different sources of
supply.
Normally refers to the IC material number, or the semi-complete component
number.
One “ehno” can have multiple corresponding “emno” due to different packagings or
customers.
One “emno” can have multiple corresponding “ehno” due to different versions or
different sources of foundry supply.
Reference from the project name. In principle, Elan no. will use the same
“bodyname”, but it is still possible that one “bodyname” can have different Elan
Nos.
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
28
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
INTERROGATORY NO. 13:
2
6
Separately for each product or design the identification of which is requested by Interrogatory
No. 12, describe in detail each sale, license, or other instance in which a customer or other third party
has obtained rights to the product or design, including inter alia the name and address of the customer
or third party, the date on which the third party or customer first obtained rights to the product or
design, what software, hardware or know-how were provided by Elan, and all written or oral
communications between Elan and the customer or third party concerning the design, operation,
structure, testing, use or maintenance of the product or design (including documents and persons with
knowledge).
7
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 13:
3
4
5
8
9
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
10
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
11
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan also objects to this
12
Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this
13
matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects
14
to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
15
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
16
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that no customer or
17
third party has “obtained rights” to any product or design, as Elan understands that term as used in
18
Interrogatory No. 13.
19
INTERROGATORY NO. 14:
20
21
Separately for each product or design the identification of which is requested by Interrogatory
No. 12, describe in detail each individual that participated in the design or development of that product
or design and their role in the design or development.
22
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 14:
23
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
24
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
25
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
26
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan also objects to this
27
Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this
28
matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
29
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
2
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
3
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan understands the following
4
individuals to have participated in the design or development of the products identified in response to
5
Interrogatory No. 12:
6
Name
Title
Yang, Wei-Wen (Eric)
Sr. Manager
Wu, Wan-Ling (Winnie)
Research and Development Asst.
9
Wu, Teng-Yen (Draco)
Sr. Manager
10
Wu, Chih-Lung (Jacky)
Sr. Electrical Technology Manager
11
Chen, Te-Jung (Darren)
Senior Electrical Engineer
Chen, Jian-Wei (Leo)
Software Engineer
Kuo, Jui-Ting (Jennie)
Research and Development Asst.
Lin, Yen-Yo (Tom)
Linux Software Engineer
14
Lin, Song-Yi (Steven)
Electrical Engineer
15
Lee, Yu-Tien (Alex)
Electrical Engineer
16
Ho, Yi-Hsiang (Peter)
FAE Engineer
Chuang, Ying-Jie (Roger)
Windows Software Engineer
7
8
12
13
17
Wei, Wei-Feng (Giorgio)
Software Engineer
18
Hsu, Hsin-Fu (Samuel)
Firmware Engineer
19
Huang, Kuo-Ming (Aaron)
Firmware Engineer
20
Wang, Kuo-Tai (Miller)
Electrical Engineer
21
Tsai, Po-Ming (Koven)
Electrical Engineer
Chang, Wen-Hong (Wilson) Electrical Engineer
22
Eric Chung
Director
23
Mai, Wei-Kuo
Supervisor, Firmware Development
24
Wu, Tsung-Hsiao
Director
25
Pai, Charles
Director
26
Chiu, Yen-Chang (Godwin) Director
Tang, Maco
27
Assistant Manager
Roven Lee
Assistant Manager
28
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
30
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
INTERROGATORY NO. 15:
2
Separately for each product or design the identification of which is requested by Interrogatory
No. 12, state the total quantity of the product or design made, used, sold, offered for sale, imported,
exported, leased, distributed, or licensed in the United States, and the gross and net revenues and
profits derived from each such activity (including documents and persons with knowledge).
3
4
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 15:
5
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
6
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
7
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
8
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan also objects to this
9
Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this
10
matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects
11
to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
12
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.
13
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan states that it does not know the
14
total quantity of products made, used, sold, offered for sale, imported, exported, leased, distributed, or
15
licensed in the United States, or the gross or net revenues or profits derived from each such activity, if
16
any. Elan has not made, used, sold, offered for sale, imported, exported, leased, distributed, or licensed
17
in the United States any of its products identified in the response to Interrogatory No. 12.
18
INTERROGATORY NO. 16:
19
20
For each claim of each Apple Patent-in-Suit that you contend is not infringed by Elan Accused
Products, describe in detail the factual basis of such contention.
21
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 16:
22
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan also
23
objects to this Interrogatory as seeking information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client
24
privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege or protection. Elan
25
further objects to this Interrogatory as premature.
26
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it will retain an
27
expert to respond to Apple’s contention that Elan allegedly infringes the Apple Patents-in-Suit, and
28
will disclose its expert’s opinions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), upon issuance of a claim
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
31
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
1
construction order and in accordance with the Court’s schedule for expert discovery, once issued. Elan
2
further responds that each of the asserted claims of Apple Patents-in-Suit are invalid in light of the
3
prior art cited in Elan’s Invalidity Contentions. Because an invalid claim cannot be infringed, Elan
4
infringes none of the Apple Patents-in-Suit.
5
INTERROGATORY NO. 17:
6
Describe in detail Elan’s activities and business in the United States with regard to Elan
Accused Products, including without limitation, marketing, sales, product development, and/or product
support and instructions directed to or conducted in the United States by Elan, including without
limitation by Elan’s ELAN Information Technology Group office in Cupertino, CA.
7
8
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 17:
9
Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to
10
this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains
11
multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible.
12
Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to
13
this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this
14
matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, inter alia to the
15
extent it seeks information regarding ELAN Information Technology Group, an entity that is not a
16
party to this lawsuit. Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected
17
from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other
18
applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory as vague and
19
ambiguous with respect to the term “Elan’s activities and business in the Untied States.”
20
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it has not sold in
21
the United States any touchpad products or any “Elan Accused Product.” Elan further responds that
22
Elan employees attended and exhibited products or product literature at the Computer Electronics
23
Show (“CES”) in Las Vegas in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Elan has already produced product literature at
24
at ELN117285 to ELN117309 that Elan employees displayed at CES, from which Apple can ascertain
25
further information responsive to this Interrogatory in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d).
26
Elan employees have also met with employees at Dell, Nokia, Logitech and Motorola in the
27
United States to discuss Elan’s products and technologies. Elan further responds that Elan Information
28
Technology Group has engaged in no activities or business in the United States related to any touchpad
ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
32
Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?