Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 225

Declaration of Derek Walter In Support of Apple Inc.'s Motion to Compel (1) Discovery Relating to US Sales; (2) Documents Improperly Withheld on the Basis of Privilege; and (3) Inventor Depositions filed byApple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 3, # 3 Exhibit 5, # 4 Exhibit 6, # 5 Exhibit 7, # 6 Exhibit 9, # 7 Exhibit 10, # 8 Exhibit 15, # 9 Exhibit 22, # 10 Exhibit 24, # 11 Exhibit 28, # 12 Exhibit 29, # 13 Exhibit 30, # 14 Exhibit 31, # 15 Exhibit 32, # 16 Exhibit 33, # 17 Exhibit 36)(Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 5/31/2011)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Yitai Hu (SBN 248085) (yitai.hu@alston.com) Sean P. DeBruine (SBN 168071) (sean.debruine@alston.com) Elizabeth Rader (SBN 184963) (elizabeth.rader@alston.com) ALSTON + BIRD LLP Two Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 Palo Alto, California 94306 Telephone: 650-838-2000 Facsimile: 650-838-2001 T. Hunter Jefferson (admitted pro hac vice) (hunter.jefferson@alston.com) ALSTON + BIRD LLP One Atlantic Center 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Telephone: 404-881-7333 Facsimile: 404-253-8863 Attorneys for Plaintiff ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE, INC.’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES [NOS. 1-17] 23 24 PROPOUNDING PARTY: APPLE, INC. 25 RESPONDING PARTY: ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION 26 SET NUMBER: ONE 27 28 ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 Plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation (“Elan”) hereby supplements its objections and 2 responses to Defendant Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) First Set of Interrogatories To Elan Microelectronics 3 Corporation (“Interrogatories”) as follows: GENERAL STATEMENTS AND OBJECTIONS 4 5 1. Elan’s responses to Apple’s First Set of Interrogatories are based on Elan’s current 6 knowledge after a reasonable inquiry. Elan’s investigation with regard to the subject matter of this 7 action is ongoing, and Elan will supplement its responses and objections in accordance with Patent 8 Local Rules and applicable law. The following responses are provided without prejudice to Elan’s 9 right to introduce at hearing or trial any evidence that is subsequently discovered relating to proof of 10 currently known facts and to produce and introduce all evidence whenever discovered relating to the 11 proof of subsequently discovered material facts. The following objections and responses do not 12 constitute any admission by Elan as to the relevance, materiality, or admissibility into evidence of the 13 subject matter or facts contained in any interrogatory or in Elan’s response. Elan reserves its right to 14 refer to, conduct discovery with reference to, or offer into evidence any and all facts, and information 15 notwithstanding the initial responses and objections interposed herein, consistent with Patent Local 16 Rules and applicable law. 17 2. Elan’s responses are made subject to and without waiver of: a. Elan’s right to object on any ground (e.g., relevance, etc.) to the use of Elan’s 18 19 responses or any portion thereof in any proceedings, including this or any other 20 action; and b. Elan’s right to object on any ground to any additional discovery requests that 21 may be served in this action. 22 23 3. Any statement made herein of an intent to produce documents is not, and shall not be 24 deemed, an admission of any factual or legal contention contained in any individual Interrogatory, nor 25 that any particular documents exist or are relevant and admissible in this matter. 26 4. In addition to any specific objections which may be made on an individual basis in the 27 separate responses set forth below, Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent that it 28 seeks to elicit information subject to and protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 1 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 product doctrine and/or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. Any inadvertent 2 disclosure of such information shall not be deemed a waiver of the attorney-client privilege, the work 3 product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or immunity. 4 5. Elan objects to the Interrogatories, including without limitation the “Definitions” and 5 “Instructions” contained therein, to the extent that they seek to impose burdens or obligations upon 6 Elan beyond what is prescribed and/or required by applicable law and rules, including the Federal 7 Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Patent Local Rules. 8 9 6. Elan objects to the Interrogatories to the extent that they seek discovery of information related to any counterclaim which the Court has dismissed from this action. Elan will only provide 10 information relating to any counterclaims for patent infringement if and when Apple asserts cognizable 11 claims of patent infringement against Elan. 12 13 14 7. Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information or documents consisting of confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information of non-parties. 8. Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information that is not 15 in Elan’s possession, custody, or control, or information that would be burdensome to locate, retrieve, 16 prepare, review, and/or produce, where such burden outweighs any material benefit the information 17 would have to the litigation. 18 19 20 9. Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent that it contains any factual or legal misrepresentations, or where they are vague and/or ambiguous. 10. Elan objects generally to each Interrogatory to the extent that it is compound and 21 contains multiple subparts, and thus represents an improper attempt to circumvent the limits on 22 interrogatories imposed by the parties’ agreement and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 23 11. These general objections are applicable to each and every one of the following specific 24 objections and responses, and failure to repeat an objection in response to a specific Interrogatory shall 25 not be deemed a waiver of the objection. Further, if Elan specifically repeats one or more of these 26 general objections in response to a specific Interrogatory, such specific response shall not be a waiver 27 of any other general objections. 28 ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 2 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 12. 1 2 Elan’s discovery responses are subject to any present or future Protective Order in this case. 3 GENERAL OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS 4 Elan objects to Apple’s “Definitions” and “Instructions” set forth in Apple’s First Set of 5 6 Interrogatories as follows: 1. Elan objects to the definition of “Elan,” “you,” and “your” as set forth in Definition 2 to 7 the extent that these terms are defined to include attorneys, consultants, and other categories of persons 8 who are not parties to the above-captioned matter. Elan understands the term “Elan” to mean Elan 9 Microelectronics Corporation, including its officers, directors, agents and representatives acting on its 10 behalf, excluding its attorneys and counsel and those acting on behalf of its attorneys and counsel. 11 Elan objects to any Interrogatory that purports to impose any obligation to obtain responsive 12 information from non-parties. Elan will undertake to disclose responsive information, as further 13 described below, that is located within the possession, custody, or control of Elan. 14 2. Elan objects to the definition of “Elan Accused Products” as set forth in Definition 8 as 15 vague and ambiguous as the term “touch-sensitive input device” has not been defined and its meaning 16 is not clear on its face. 17 3. Elan objects to the definitions of “Related Patents” as set forth in Definition 10 as 18 overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it encompasses all unpublished pending and 19 abandoned applications from or through which any of the Elan Patents-in-Suit claim priority, all 20 unpublished pending and abandoned applications that claim priority from or through any of the Elan 21 Patents-in-Suit, and all unpublished pending and abandoned applications of any foreign counterpart 22 patents or patent applications of any of the foregoing. Elan objects to the definitions as they are used to 23 seek information that is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of 24 admissible evidence. 25 4. Elan objects to the definition of “Communication” as set forth in Definition 11 as 26 overbroad. Elan also objects to this definition as vague and ambiguous with respect to the term, “any 27 other medium,” which prevents Elan from reasonably ascertaining the meaning and scope of the term 28 “Communication.” ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 3 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 5. Elan objects to the various definitions of the terms “identify,” “identity,” and “identification” as set forth in Definition 13 as overbroad, unduly burdensome and oppressive. SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES 3 4 INTERROGATORY NO. 1: 5 Separately for each claim of the Elan Patents-in-Suit, describe in detail the conception and reduction to practice of the claimed invention and any acts of diligence, including the dates on which Elan contends the claimed invention was conceived and reduced to practice and each person and all documents that can corroborate such conception, reduction to practice and/or diligence. 6 7 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1: 8 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 9 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 10 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 11 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to 12 this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 13 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 14 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present 15 claim or defense in this matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible 16 evidence. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory as premature because it seeks a response relating to 17 infringement contentions before the time specified for such contentions under the Court’s rules and 18 schedule. 19 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan contends that the inventions 20 claimed in the ‘352 patent were conceived of and reduced to practice no later than January 4, 1996 21 when the original application that led to the ‘352 patent was filed. Elan believes that the claimed 22 inventions were conceived of and possibly reduced to practice before that date. Elan reserves the right 23 to supplement its response based on any additional information obtained from further investigation or 24 discovery in this matter, including documents or testimony obtained from Apple’s subpoenas to 25 Logitech, Inc. or Mr. Stephen Bisset. 26 Regarding the ‘353 patent, Elan contends that the claimed inventions were reduced to practice 27 on April 2, 2003 with the filing of Taiwan priority patent application 92205217 U. Elan contends that 28 the claimed inventions were conceived of prior to that date, but Elan is not currently able to establish a ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 4 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 precise date of conception. Elan’s investigation and discovery are ongoing, and Elan reserves its right 2 to supplement this response. Apple can ascertain the information responsive to Interrogatory No. 1 in 3 the business records labeled ELN015382 through ELN015384 previously produced by Elan. Elan is 4 aware of no further documents responsive information within its possession or control regarding the 5 ‘353 patent, and none of the inventors of the ‘353 patent are currently employed by Elan. 6 INTERROGATORY NO. 2: 7 Separately for each claim of the Elan Patents-in-Suit, identify the individual and/or individuals that Elan contends conceived the subject matter of that claim or participated in the reduction to practice of the subject matter of that claim, including the subject matter he or she contributed to that claim or the contribution of that individual to the reduction to practice of that claim, including a full description of all facts and circumstances (including documents and persons with knowledge) and reasons supporting such contention. 8 9 10 11 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory as premature because it seeks a response relating to infringement contentions before the time specified for such contentions under the Court’s rules and schedule. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that each of the asserted 23 24 25 26 27 28 claims of the ‘352 patent was conceived and reduced to practice by Stephen J. Bisset and Bernard Kasser of Palo Alto and Menlo Park, California, respectively, while employed at Logitech, Inc. of Fremont, California, during a period of time ending no later than January 4, 1996. Other than the ‘352 patent application, Elan is not aware of documents or information within its possession or control, acquired from Logitech or otherwise, relating to the conception and reduction to practice of the ‘352 patent. ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 5 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 Elan responds that the ‘353 patent was conceived and reduced to practice by Yen-Chang 2 (“Godwin”) Chiu, Yung-Lieh (“Kelvin”) Chien, Shich-Chi (“Edward”) Lin, and Ting-Hao Yeh, all of 3 Taiwan, R.O.C., while employed at Elan, during a period of time ending no later than April 2, 2003. 4 Other than the patent application filed in Taiwan, Elan is not aware of documents or information within 5 its possession or control relating to the conception and reduction to practice of the ‘353 patent. 6 INTERROGATORY NO. 3: 7 Separately for each claim of the Elan Patents-in-Suit, identify the first written description, first offer for sale, first sale, first public disclosure, first public use, and first disclosure to another of the claimed invention, including, without limitation, the date on which such event occurred, the identity of each person with knowledge of any of the foregoing and the identity of all documents relating to the foregoing. 8 9 10 11 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3: Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 12 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 13 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 14 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to 15 this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 16 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 17 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as premature because it seeks a response relating to infringement 18 contentions before the time specified for such contentions under the Court’s rules and schedule. 19 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it obtained its 20 present rights and interests in U.S. Patent No. 5,825,352 (“the ‘352 Patent”) on September 23, 2003 21 from K-Tech Devices. Elan understands that a first offer for sale, sale, public disclosure, public use or 22 disclosure to another occurred before Elan obtained any interest in the ‘352 Patent. After a reasonable 23 search, Elan is not aware of any information in its possession, custody, or control describing a first 24 offer for sale, sale, public disclosure, public use or disclosure of the ‘352 patent. With respect to U.S. 25 Patent No. 7,274,353 (“the ‘353 Patent”), Elan responds that it has not sold, offered for sale or publicly 26 used a product embodying an invention claimed in the patent. The first disclosure occurred with the 27 filing of the underlying patent application. 28 ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 6 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 INTERROGATORY NO. 4: 2 Identify all Prior Art to the Elan Patents-in-Suit that Elan is aware of, and describe in detail when, by whom and under what circumstances such Prior Art was discovered or identified. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 4: Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it is aware of prior art references relating to the ‘352 Patent which are identified on the face of the patent. With respect to the ‘352 Patent, Elan is also aware that Apple has identified additional alleged prior art in its invalidity contentions served in the present litigation and that Synaptics, Inc. identified alleged additional prior art in its invalidity contentions served during the previous litigation, which Elan has previously produced to Apple. Elan further responds that it is aware of prior art references relating to the ‘353 Patent which are identified on the face of the patent. With respect to the ‘353 Patent, Elan is also aware that Apple has identified additional alleged prior art in its invalidity contentions served in the present litigation. Elan is presently unaware of any actual or alleged prior art relating to the ‘352 Patent or the ‘353 Patent which is not identified in these documents. INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Separately for each Elan Patent-in-Suit, state whether Elan contends that it has satisfied the marking requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287, and if so, describe in detail all facts and circumstances supporting or otherwise relating to that contention (including documents and persons with knowledge). SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by 28 ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 7 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, 2 immunity, or protection. 3 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that as early as May, 4 2006, Elan started marking the patent number of the ‘352 Patent, among other patents, on the boxes in 5 which it ships its touch-sensitive input devices practicing the ‘352 Patent. See ELN017263- 6 ELN017264. Also see ELN120369, ELN120371-ELN120374. Further, Elan placed the same on the 7 user interface window on or about April 2008. See ELN120367-ELN120368. 8 INTERROGATORY NO. 6: 9 Separately for each Elan Patent-in-Suit, state the date on which Elan contends that Apple first became aware of that patent (whether through actual or constructive notice) and describe in detail all facts and circumstances supporting or otherwise relating to that contention (including documents and persons with knowledge). 10 11 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 6: 12 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 13 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 14 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 15 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by 16 the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, 17 immunity, or protection. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information 18 that is in Apple’s possession or equally available to Apple. 19 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it understands that 20 at least one individual involved in the prosecution of Apple’s U.S. Patent No. 7,561,146 (“the ‘146 21 Patent”) was aware of the ‘352 Patent at least as early as August 25, 2004, when an Information 22 Disclosure Statement filed as part of the prosecution of the ‘146 Patent identified the ‘352 Patent as 23 prior art. Apple has acknowledged and admitted that it was aware of the ‘352 Patent at least as early as 24 August 25, 2004. Elan also responds that Apple was notified of its infringement of the ‘352 patent in a 25 letter dated August 27, 2006 from Daisuke Shudo, the General Manager of Elantech Devices 26 Corporation (See ELN126440) and in a letter dated October 16, 2006 from Ming-Tao Yang, Esq. (See 27 ELN126442). Elan further responds that Apple became aware of the ‘353 Patent at least as early as 28 April, 7, 2009, the date of the filing of this lawsuit and service of the Complaint on Apple. ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 8 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 INTERROGATORY NO. 7: 2 Describe in detail all facts and circumstances relating to each communication between Elan and any third party concerning licensing, contracts, agreements, covenants not to sue, settlement agreements, actual or potential infringement, invalidity, or unenforceability of any of the Patents-inSuit and the identities of all such third parties, including, but not limited to, the identity of each entity contacted by Elan regarding any of the Elan Patents-in-Suit and each license granted, obtained, or offered by Elan to any of the Elan Patents-in-Suit. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 7: Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks “each communication between Elan and any third party.” Elan further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information containing proprietary or confidential information of Elan or a non-party. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that Elan and Synaptics, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement with respect to ‘352 Patent in October 2008. Elan further states that Elan and Synaptics were engaged in litigation concerning, inter alia, Synaptics’ infringement of the ‘352 patent. That litigation also involved Prostar Computer, Inc. and Averatec, Inc. The pleadings and correspondence between the parties have been produced to Apple. Elan objects to the request that it “describe in detail each communication” between Elan and Synaptics, Prostar or Averatec during that litigation as unduly burdensome. Elan further responds that Elan had at least the following communications concerning Elan’s ‘352 patent:  Communications with Richard Wooley of Cirque Corporation concerning Cirque’s GlidePoint® touchpad with so-called Advanced Gestures, through Elan’s outside counsel Alston & Bird, beginning during or around July 6, 2009. See ELN126472. ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 9 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1  A letter to Mary E. Doyle of Palm, Inc. concerning Palm’s Palm Pre smart phone, 2 through Elan’s outside counsel Alston & Bird, during or around July 6, 2009. See 3 ELN126471. That letter was followed by a telephone conversation between Sean 4 DeBruine, counsel for Elan, and Douglass Luftman, Palm’s Assistant General Counsel. 5  Communications with Charles Chamas and Anthony Baca of Hewlett-Packard 6 Company, through Elan’s outside counsel Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 7 (“Akin Gump”), beginning during or around January 4, 2007. Mr. Baca and Mr. 8 DeBruine also had at least one telephone conversation. See ELN126444. 9  Communications with Tsuneo Toda of Toshiba Corporation concerning certain Toshiba 10 laptop products, through Elan’s outside counsel Akin Gump, beginning during or 11 around January 4, 2007. See ELN126446. ELN126451, and ELN126454. 12 Elan further responds that it has had no license discussions regarding the ‘353 Patent. 13 14 INTERROGATORY NO. 8: 15 17 Describe in detail all facts and circumstances supporting or otherwise relating to Elan’s calculation of damages allegedly resulting from Apple’s alleged infringement, including, but not limited to, the type and dollar amount of damages and the method(s) and calculation(s) used to compute that calculation of damages, including a full description of all facts (including documents and persons with knowledge) and reasons supporting such contention. 18 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 8: 16 19 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 20 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 21 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 22 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to 23 this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 24 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 25 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as improper as the subject is expert witness testimony. Elan 26 further objects to this Interrogatory as premature because the early stage of this lawsuit and the 27 discovery and investigation are ongoing. 28 ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 10 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it has yet to 2 calculate and quantify fully the damages it has suffered and continues to suffer because of Apple’s 3 infringement of the ‘352 Patent and the ‘353 Patent. Elan further responds that it will retain an expert 4 to determine the amount of damages to which Elan is entitled. Elan will disclose the opinions of its 5 expert pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) at the appropriate time under the schedule adopted by the 6 Court in this matter. 7 INTERROGATORY NO. 9: 8 Describe in detail all facts and circumstances supporting or otherwise relating to Elan’s contention that Apple has willfully infringed or is willfully infringing the Elan Patents-in-Suit, including a full description of all facts (including documents and persons with knowledge) and reasons supporting such contention. 9 10 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 9: 11 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 12 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 13 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 14 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to 15 this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 16 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 17 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as premature because the early stage of this lawsuit and the 18 discovery and investigation are ongoing. 19 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that Apple has admitted 20 in its September 8, 2009 response to Elan’s Interrogatory No. 9 that it was aware of the ‘352 Patent as 21 early as August 25, 2004. On August 27, 2006, Elan notified Apple that its product infringed the ‘352 22 Patent. Notwithstanding its knowledge of Elan’s patent rights and its infringement of those rights. 23 Apple continues to use the patented technology with existing and new products even after Elan 24 informed Apple of infringement. Apple acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its action 25 constituted infringement of a valid patent. Moreover, Apple actually knew, or should have known, that 26 its actions constituted infringement of a valid and enforceable patent. Regarding the ‘353 Patent, 27 Apple’s infringement has been willful since at least April 7, 2009, the date on which Elan filed this 28 lawsuit and served the Complaint on Apple. ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 11 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 INTERROGATORY NO. 10: 2 Separately for each of the Elan Patents-in-Suit, state the date on which Elan contends that Apple’s alleged infringement of that patent began and the date on which Elan first became aware of such infringement, and explain in detail why Elan did not commence this action against Apple between the date Elan became so aware and April 2009. 3 4 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 10: 5 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 6 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 7 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 8 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to 9 this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 10 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 11 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that Elan currently 12 understands that Apple’s infringement began with the introduction of the PowerBook G4 in February 13 2005 which used a method for sensing the contact of multiple fingers on a touchpad. Elan learned of 14 that infringement shortly before contacting Apple on August 27, 2006 about Apple’s infringement. 15 Elan brought this suit after the conclusion of its litigation involving the ‘352 Patent against Synaptics, 16 Inc. and after the parties’ ongoing negotiations failed to conclude with Apple’s purchase of a license 17 from Elan. With respect to the ‘353 Patent, Elan first learned of Apple’s infringement shortly before 18 filing this lawsuit against Apple on April, 7, 2009. 19 INTERROGATORY NO. 11: 20 21 22 23 24 25 Separately for each of the Apple Patents-in-Suit, describe in detail the facts and circumstances relating to Elan’s first awareness of the patent, including inter alia, the date Elan first became aware of the existence of the patent, the person(s) who first became aware of the patent, the circumstances surrounding Elan’s first awareness of the patent, the content of any related communications or documents and any actions taken by you as a result (including documents and persons with knowledge). SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 11: Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 26 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 27 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 28 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 12 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this 2 matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects 3 to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 4 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 5 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it currently 6 understands that Nick Lin, a patent engineer in Elan’s Legal and IPR department prepared summaries 7 of the ‘218 and ‘659 patents on or about September, 24, 2008 and February 26, 2009, respectively. 8 Nick Lin uploaded the ‘218 patent summary onto Elan’s document management system, and internally 9 circulated the ‘659 patent summary to Chairman Yeh, the legal department and the research and 10 development department. Elan was not aware of Apple’s ‘218 patent or ‘659 patent before Mr. Lin 11 prepared the respective reports. 12 INTERROGATORY NO. 12: 13 Identify (by product name, including all trade names and designations, internal names, and names during development; part number; model; manufacturer; designer; supplier; and dates first sold or offered for sale) all products or designs of all touch-sensitive input devices or touch pads designed, marketed, made, used, sold, offered for sale, imported, exported, licensed, or distributed by or for Elan. 14 15 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 12: 16 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 17 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 18 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 19 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan also objects to this 20 Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this 21 matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects 22 to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 23 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 24 Elan further objects to this Interrogatory as vague and ambiguous with respect to the term “touch25 sensitive input devices” as the term has not been defined and its meaning is not clear on its face. 26 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan understands the following products and 27 the products listed in the below table to be touch-sensitive input devices or touchpads: 28 ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 13 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 Elan’s TP3 touch pads have the following part numbers: 804262-0000, 804262-0001, 8042620020, 814262-0000, and 814262-0001. 3 Elan’s KTP3 touch pads have the following part numbers: 800306-2301, 800306-2401, 4 800306-5201, 800306-5411, 800306-5431, 800306-5441, 800307-5100, 800311-1103, 800401-5003, 5 800401-5103, 800406-0803, 800406-1803, 800406-1813, 800406-1823, 800406-1833, 800406-1843, 6 800406-1863, 800406-1873, 800410-3012, 800410-3032, 810306-2301, 810306-5411, 810306-5431, 7 810306-5451, 810306-5461, 810307-5100, 810308-5202, 810308-5212, 810310-5022, 810311-1103, 8 810406-0803, 810406-1853, 810406-5053, 810410-3012, and 810410-3042. 9 Elan’s KTP5 touch pads have the following part numbers: 800406-1603, 800406-1612, 10 800409-5003, 800409-5103, 800409-5303, 800409-5503, 800410-2001, 800410-5001, 800504-2602, 11 800505-1003, 810406-1603, 810409-1112, 810409-1122, 810409-5103, 810409-5202, 810409-5603, 12 810410-5001, 810410-5021, 810504-2602, 810505-1003, 810509-2703, 810509-3001, 810509-5001, 13 810511-0702, 810511-0901, 810511-0911, 810511-0921, 810511-5002, 810512-0102, 810512-0102 14 V01, 810512-0112, 810512-0112 V01, 810512-0122, and 810602-1703. 15 Elan’s KTP6 touch pads have the following part numbers: 810506-1701, 810507-0703, 16 810507-0803, 810507-2100, 810508-0900, 810508-1600, 810508-1708, 810509-0900, 810509-2800, 17 800507-0703, 800507-0803, 800507-5003, 800507-5103, and 810604-1000. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 emno BI026P-J21N501U BI030G-T88MJ01U BI030G-T88X401U BI032G-C05M501U BI032G-C06MB01U BI032G-C07M501U BI032G-C08M501U BI032G-T02MB01U BI032G-T02MB01U BI032G-T02MB01U BI032G-T02MB01U BI032G-T02MB01U BI032G-T02MB01U BI032G-T02MB01U ver JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JB JC JD JE JF JG LINE ehno SHI MKT126A SHI MKT130A SHI MKT133A SHI MKT103A SHI MKT097A SHI MKT120A SHI MKT127A SHI MKT086A SHI MKT086B SHI MKT086C SHI MKT086D SHI MKT086E SHI MKT086F SHI MKT086G ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND 14 RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES pdname BI026PJ211 BI030GT881 BI030GT881 BI032GC051 BI032C061 BI032GC071 BI032GC081 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 bodyname BI026PJ211 BI030GT881 BI030GT881 BI032GC051 BI032C061 BI032GC071 BI032GC081 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 BI032GT021 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BI032G-T02MB01U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB02U BI032G-T02MB03U BI032G-T02MB03U BI032G-T02MB04U BI032G-T02MB04U BI032G-T02MB04U BI032G-T02MB04U BI032G-T02MB04U BI032G-T02MB05U BI032G-T02MB05U BI032G-T02MB05U BI032G-T02MB06U BI032G-T02MB06U BI032G-T02MB06U BI032G-T02MB06U BI032G-T02MB06U BI032G-T02MB06U BI032G-T02MB07U BI032G-T02MB07U BI032G-T02MB08U BI032G-T02MB09U BI032G-T02MB09U BI032G-T02MB10U BI032G-T02MB11U BI032G-T02MB11U BI032G-T02MB12U BI032G-T02MB13U BI032G-T02MB13U BI032G-T02MB14U BI032G-T02MB15U JH JA JB JC JD JE JF JG JH JI JA JB JA JB JC JD JE JA JB JC JA JB JC JD JE JF JA JB JA JA JB JA JA JB JA JA JB JA JA SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI MKT086H MKT088A MKT088B MKT088C MKT088D MKT088E MKT088F MKT088G MKT088H MKT088I MKT096A MKT096B MKT099A MKT099B MKT099C MKT099D MKT099E MKT101A MKT101B MKT101C MKT111A MKT111B MKT111C MKT111D MKT111E MKT111F MKT115A MKT115B MKT116A MKT117A MKT117B MKT119A MKT147A MKT147B MKT122A MKT125A MKT125B MKT151A MKT153A ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 15 BI032GT021 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032T023 BI032GT023 BI032GT024 BI032GT024 BI032GT024 BI032GT024 BI032GT024 BI032GT025 BI032GT025 BI032GT025 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT027 BI032GT027 BI032GT028 BI032GT029 BI032GT029 BI032GT02A BI032GT02D BI032GT02D BI032GT02B BI032GT02C BI032GT02C BI032GT02F BI032GT02G BI032GT021 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032GT022 BI032T023 BI032T023 BI032GT024 BI032GT024 BI032GT024 BI032GT024 BI032GT024 BI032GT025 BI032GT025 BI032GT025 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT026 BI032GT027 BI032GT027 BI032GT028 BI032GT029 BI032GT029 BI032GT02A BI032GT02D BI032GT02D BI032GT02B BI032GT02C BI032GT02C BI032GT02F BI032GT02G Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BI032G-T02MB16U BI032G-T02MB17U BI032G-T02MB18U BI032G-T02MB19U BI032G-T02MB20U BI032G-T02MB21U BI032G-T02MB22U BI034G-T88M501U BI034P-J21M501U BI034P-J21M501U BI034P-T88M501U BI037G-JC1BB01U BI037G-T03W401U BI037G-T88W401U BI038G-J21W201U BI038G-J21W201U BI038G-T88W401U BI038G-T88WJ01U BI046G-JC1AB01U BI072G-JC1KB01U BI101E-T88W701U BI1030-M24EGAU BI1050-M35CMAU BI1050-M35TSBU BI1050-M35TSCU BI1050-M35TSEU BI1051-M32AGAU BI1051-M32AGAU BI1051-M32AGAU BI1051-M32EMAU BI1051-M32EMAU BI1051-M32EMAU BI1051-M32HTBU BI1051-M32HTBU BI1051-M32HTBU BI1051-M32HTBU BI1051-M32HTBU BI1051-M32HTBU BI1051-M32HTBU JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JB JA JA JA JA JA JB JA JA JA JA JA JA JB JA JA JA JA JB JC JA JB JC SA SB SC SD SE SF SG SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI MKT154A MKT155A MKT150A MKT156A MKT157A MKT159A MKT160A MKT112A MKT106A MKT106B MKT114A MKT165A MKT123A MKT144A MKT141A MKT141B MKT138A MKT135A MKT161A MKT163A MKT148A MKT020A MKT066A MKT054A MKT058A MKT100A MKT090A MKT090B MKT090C MKT085A MKT085B MKT085C MKT081A MKT081B MKT081C MKT081D MKT081E MKT081F MKT081G ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 16 BI032GT02H BI032GT02I BI032GT02E BI032GT02J BI032GT02K BI032GT02L BI032GT02M BI034GT885 BI034PJ211 BI034PJ211 BI034PT881 BI037GJC11 BI037GT031 BI037GT881 BI038GJ211 BI038GJ211 BI038GT881 BI038GT881 BI046GJC11 BI072GJC11 BI101ET881 BI1030EGA BI1050CMA BI1050TSB BI1050TSC BI1050TSE BI1051AGA BI1051AGA BI1051AGA BI1051EMA BI1051EMA BI1051EMA BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI032GT02H BI032GT02I BI032GT02E BI032GT02J BI032GT02K BI032GT02L BI032GT02M BI034GT885 SC032HT4A SC032HT4A BI034PT881 BI037GJC11 BI037GT031 BI037GT881 TBI038GJ211 TBI038GJ211 BI038GT881 BI038GT881 BI046GJC11 BI072GJC11 BI101ET881 BI1030EGA BI1050CMA BI1050TSB BI1050TSC BI1051SNA BI1051AGA BI1051AGA BI1051AGA BI1051EMA BI1051EMA BI1051EMA BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BI1051-M32HTBU BI1051-M32HTBU BI1051-M35CMBU BI1051-M35CMBU BI1051-M35CMBU BI1051-M35CMBU BI1051-M35CMCU BI1051-M35CMCU BI1051-M35CMCU BI1051-M35CMCU BI1051-M35CMCU BI1051-M40GMAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNAU BI1051-M48SNBU BI1051-M48SNBU BI1051-M48SNBU BI1051-M48SNBU BI8250-M32CHAU BI8250-M32CHAU BI8250-M32CHAU BI8250-M32CHBU BI8250-M32CHBU BI8250-M32CHBU BI8250-M32CHCU BI8250-M32CHCU BI8250-M32CHCU BI8250-S32ANHU BI8250-S32ANHU BI8251-M28WKAU BI8251-M28WKAU BI8256-M40BWBU SX SY JA JB JC JD JA JB JC JD JE JA SA SB SC SD SE SF SG SH SK SA SB SC SD JA JB JC JA JB JC JA JB JC JA JB JB JD JA SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI MKT081X MKT105A MKT069A MKT069B MKT069C MKT069D MKT071A MKT071B MKT071C MKT071D MKT071E MKT067A MKT079A MKT079B MKT079C MKT079D MKT079E MKT079F MKT079G MKT079H MKT079K MKT094A MKT094B MKT094C MKT094D MDT001A MDT001B MKT026A MKT002A MKT002B MKT002C MKT001A MKT001B MKT001C MDT002A MDT002B MDT003A MKT030A MKT031A ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 17 BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051CMB BI1051CMB BI1051CMB BI1051CMB BI1051CMC BI1051CMC BI1051CMC BI1051CMC BI1051CMC BI1051GMA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNB BI1051SNB BI1051SNB BI1051SNB BI8250CHA BI8250CHA BI8250CHA1 BI8250CHB BI8250CHB BI8250CHB BI8250CHC BI8250CHC BI8250CHC BI8250S32 BI8250S32 BI8251M28 BI8251WKA BI8256BWB BI1051HTB BI1051HTB BI1051CMB BI1051CMB BI1051CMB BI1051CMB BI1051CMC BI1051CMC BI1051CMC BI1051CMC BI1051CMC BI1051GMA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNA BI1051SNB BI1051SNB BI1051SNB BI1051SNB BI8250CHA BI8250CHA BI8250CHA1 BI8250CHB BI8250CHB BI8250CHB BI8250CHC BI8250CHC BI8250CHC BI8250S32 BI8250S32 BI8251M28 BI8251WKA BI8256BWB Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BI8256-M40BWBU BI8256-M40TCAU BI8256-S40AWGU BI8256-S40AWHU BI8256-S43AXGU BI8256-S43AXHU BI8258-M43CPAU BI8258-M43EGAU BI8261-M32CHAU BT0101-DL001FU BT0102-PD005PU BT8210-EM001PU BT8210-EM002PU BT8210-EM003PU BW8231-IA001FU CB0000A-CM001AU CB0000A-CM001AU CB0000A-CM002AU CB0000A-CM002AU CB0000A-CM003AU CB0000A-CM004AU CB0000A-CM004AU CB0000A-CM005AU CB0000A-CM006AU CB0000A-CP001AU CB0000A-EM001AU CB0102A-IA001AU CB030G-K04MJ01U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U JB JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JC SA JA JA JA JA JA JA JB JA JB JA JA JB JA JA SA JA JA JA SA SB SC SD SE SF SG SH SI SJ SK SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI MKT031B MKT032A MKT033A MKT034A MKT035A MKT036A MKT078A MKT037A MDT007A B&S MD1006A B&S B&S B&S MD2005A MDT056A MDT056B MDT057A MDT057B MDT061A MDT065A MDT065B MDT069A MDT085A B&S MDT083A MDT037A MDT076A MDT059A MDT059B MDT059B MDT059D MDT059E MDT059F MDT059G MDT059G MDT059I MDT059J MDT059G ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 18 BI8256BWB BI8256TCA BI8256AWG BI8256AWH BI8256AXG BI8256AXH BI8258CPA BI8258EGA BI8261M32 _BT0101 BT01028TT _BT8210 _BT8210 _BT8210 BW8231IA1 CB0000CM1 CB0000CM1 CB0000CM2 CB0000CM2 CB0000CM3 CB0000CM4 CB0000CM4 CB0000CM5 CB0000CM6 _CB00CP1A CB0000EM1 CB0102IA1 CB030K041 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 BI8256BWB BI8256TCA BI8256AWG BI8256AWH BI8256AXG BI8256AXH BI8258CPA BI8258EGA BI8261M32 B&S BT01028TT B&S B&S B&S BW8231IA1 CB0000CM1 CB0000CM1 CM0000CM2 CM0000CM2 CB0000CM3 CB0000CM4 CB0000CM4 CB0000CM5 CB0000CM6 B&S CB0000EM1 CB0102IA1 CB030K041 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X401U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X402U CB043G-T01X403U CB043G-T01X403U CB043G-T01X403U CB043G-T01X403U CB043G-T01X403U CB043G-T01X403U CB043G-T01X403U CB043G-T01X404U CB043G-T01X404U CB043G-T01X404U CB043G-T01X404U CB043G-T01X404U CB043G-T01X404U CB043G-T01X404U CB043G-T01X405U CB043G-T01X406U CB043G-T01X408U CB043G-T01X409U CB043G-T01X410U CB060G-T88N01AU CB1030A-EG001AU CB1050A-CM001AU CB1050A-MV001AU CB1050A-SN001AU CB1050A-SN002AU CB1050A-TS001AU SL SM SN SO SA SB SC SD SE SF SG SH SZ SA SB SC SD SE SY SZ SA SB SC SD SE SY SZ SA SA SA SA SA JA JA JB JA SA SA JB SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI MDT059G MDT059J MDT059J MDT059O MDT063A MDT063B MDT063C MDT063D MDT063E MDT063D MDT063E MDT063H MDT063A MDT067A MDT067B MDT067C MDT067C MDT067E MDT067B MDT067A MDT068A MDT068B MDT068C MDT068C MDT068E MDT068B MDT068A MDT087A MDT088A MDT090A MDT091A MDT092A MDT081A MDT004A MDT006B MDT012A MDT013A MDT036A MDT014B ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 19 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT011 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT015 CB043GT016 CB043GT018 CB043GT019 CB043GT01A CB060GT881 CB1030EG1 CB1050CM1 CB1050MV1 CB1050SN1 CB1050SN2 CB1050TS1 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB1051HT3 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT012 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT013 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT014 CB043GT015 CB043GT016 CB043GT018 CB043GT019 CB043GT01A CB060GT881 CB1030EG1 CB1050CM1 CB1050MV1 CB1050SN1 CB1050SN2 CB1050TS1 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CB1050A-TS002AU CB1050A-TS002AU CB1050A-TS003AU CB1051A-AG001AU CB1051A-CM002AU CB1051A-CM002AU CB1051A-CM002AU CB1051A-CM003AU CB1051A-CM003AU CB1051A-CM003AU CB1051A-CM004AU CB1051A-CM004AU CB1051A-CM004AU CB1051A-CM004AU CB1051A-CM004AU CB1051A-CM004AU CB1051A-CM004AU CB1051A-CM004AU CB1051A-CM005AU CB1051A-CM006AU CB1051A-DT001AU CB1051A-EM001AU CB1051A-EM001AU CB1051A-EM001AU CB1051A-EM003AU CB1051A-GM001AU CB1051A-HT001AU CB1051A-HT002AU CB1051A-HT002AU CB1051A-HT002AU CB1051A-HT002AU CB1051A-HT002AU CB1051A-IA001AU CB1051A-IA001AU CB1051A-IA001AU CB1051A-IA001AU CB1051A-IA001AU CB1051A-IA001MT CB1051A-MV002AU JA JB JA JA JA JB JC JA JB JC JA JB JC JD JE JF JG JH JB JA JA JA JB JC JA JA SA SA SB SC SD SE JA JB JC JD JE JA SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI MDT039A MDT039B MDT060A MDT062A MDT045A MDT045B MDT045C MDT046A MDT046B MDT046C MDT055A MDT055A MDT055C MDT055D MDT055E MDT055E MDT055E MDT055E MDT070B MDT086A MDT071A MDT053A MDT053B MDT053C MDT066A MDT044A MDT047A MDT052A MDT052B MDT052C MDT052D MDT052E MDT054A MDT054B MDT054C MDT054D MDT054E B&S MDT051A ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 20 CB1050TS2 CB1050TS2 CB1050TS3 CB1051AG1 CB1051CM2 CB1051CM2 CB1051CM2 CB1051CM3 CB1051CM3 CB1051CM3 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051ACM5 CB1051CM6 CB1051DT1 CB1051EM1 CB1051EM1 CB1051EM1 CB1051EM3 CB1051GMA CB1051HT1 CB1051HT2 CB1051HT2 CB1051HT2 CB1051HT2 CB1051HT2 CB1051IA1 CB1051IA1 CB1051IA1 CB1051IA1 CB1051IA1 _CB1051A CB1051MV2 CB1050TS2 CB1050TS2 CB1051SN1 CB1051AG1 CB1051CM2 CB1051CM2 CB1051CM2 CB1051CM3 CB1051CM3 CB1051CM3 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051CM4 CB1051ACM5 CB1051CM6 CB1051DT1 CB1051EM1 CB1051EM1 CB1051EM1 CB1051EM3 CB1051GMA CB1051HT1 CB1051HT2 CB1051HT2 CB1051HT2 CB1051HT2 CB1051HT2 CB1051IA1 CB1051IA1 CB1051IA1 CB1051IA1 CB1051IA1 B&S CB1051MV2 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CB1051A-SH001AU CB1051A-SH001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-SN001AU CB1051A-TS002AU CB1051A-TS002AU CB1060A-AC001AU CB1060A-EM001AU CB1060A-EM002AU CB1060A-EM003AU CB1060A-EM004AU CB1060A-EM005AU CB1060A-MB001AU CB1060A-MB002AU CB1060A-MB003AU CB1060A-MV001AU CB1060A-SH001AU CB1060A-SH002AU CB1060A-SH003AU CB1060A-SH003AU CB8231A-AG001AU CB8231A-AG002AU CB8231A-HC002AU CB8231A-IA001AU CB8232A-LC001AU CB8250A-CH001AU CB8250A-M32CHAU CB8250A-VG001AU CB8250A-VG001AU JA JZ SA SB SC SD SE SF SG SH SI SJ SK SL JA JB JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JA JB JA JA JB JA JA JA JA JA JB SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI MDT064A MDT064A MDT048A MDT048B MDT048B MDT048B MDT048E MDT048E MDT048I MDT048J MDT048I MDT048J MDT048K MDT048K MDT042A MDT042B MDT072A MDT074A MDT075A MDT079A MDT082A MDT084A MDT093A MDT094A MDT095A MDT078A MDT073A MDT077A MDT080A MDT080B MDT015A MDT016A MDT018B MDT019A MDT043A MDT024A MDT025A MDT026A MDT026B ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 21 CB1051SH1 CB1051SH1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051TS2 CB1051TS2 CB1060AC1 CB1060EMA CB1060EM2 CB1060EM3 CB1060EM4 CB1060EM5 CB1060MB1 CB1060MB2 CB1060MB3 CB1052MV1 CB1060SH1 CB1060SH2 CB1060SH3 CB1060SH3 CB8231AG1 CB8231AG2 CB8231HC2 CB8231IA1 CB8232LC1 CB8250CH1 CB8250CHA CB8250VG1 CB8250VG1 CB1051SH1 CB1051SH1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051SN1 CB1051TS2 CB1051TS2 CB1060AC1 CB1060EMA CB1060EM2 CB1060EM3 CB1060EM4 CB1060EM5 CB1060MB1 CB1060MB2 CB1060MB3 CB1052MV1 CB1060SH1 CB1060SH2 CB1060SH3 CB1060SH3 CB8231AG1 CB8231AG2 CB8231HC2 CB8231IA1 CB8232LC1 CB8250CH1 CB8250CHA CB8250VG1 CB8250VG1 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CB8250C-M32CHAU CB8251B-WK001AU CB8251B-WK001AU CB8251C-WK001AU CB8256A-BW002AU CB8256A-BW002AU CB8256A-TC001AU CB8258A-EG001AU CB8261A-CH001AU KT1030-CO002GAQ KT1030-ZP001GAQ KT8120CW KT8120CW KT8120CW KT8120CW KT8120EW KT8120H KT8120KCW KT8120KCW KT8120KCW KT8120KCW 831001-22X2 831001-23X2 eSK-R20-X 831001-23B2 831001-2332 831001-2342 831001-22B2 831001-2232 831001-2242 800306-2300 800306-2401 800306-2501 800306-2511 800306-5201 800306-5301 800306-5421 800306-5501 800307-5101 JB JB JD JC JA JB JA JA JC JC JC JK JQ SK SQ SQ XK JK JQ SK SQ 1 1 SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI SHI MDT027A MDT029A MDT029C MDT030A MDT031A MDT031B MDT032A MDT033A MDT034B EG5792C EG5792C EJ5780C-028 EJ5780D-028 EJ5780C-028 EJ5780D-028 EJ5780D-028 EJ5780C-028 EJ5780C-028 EJ5780D-028 EJ5780C-028 EJ5780D-028 CB8250CHA1 CB8251WK11 CB8251WK11 CB8251WK12 CB8256BW2 CB8256BW2 CB8256TC1 CB8258EG1 CB8261CH1 EKTP1030 EKTP1030 EKT8120 EKT8120 EKT8120 EKT8120 EKT8120 EKT8120 EKT8120 EKT8120 EKT8120 EKT8120 CB8250CHA1 CB8251WK11 CB8251WK11 CB8251WK12 CB8256BW2 CB8256BW2 CB8256TC1 CB8258EG1 CB8261CH1 EKTP1030 EKTP1030 EKT0101 EKT0101 EKT0101 EKT0101 EKT0101 EKT0101 EKT0101 EKT0101 EKT0101 EKT0101 A A A A A A AVE AVE AVE AVE AVE AVE TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP 831001 831001 831001 831001 831001 831001 800306A 800306A 800306A 800306A 800306A 800306A 800306A 800306A 800307A 83100123B2 8310012332 8310012342 83100122B2 8310012232 8310012242 8003062300 8003062401 8003062501 8003062511 8003065201 8003065301 8003065421 8003065501 8003075101 83100123B2 83100123B2 83100123B2 83100123B2 83100123B2 83100123B2 8003065501 8003065501 8003065501 8003065501 8003065501 8003065501 8003065501 8003065501 8003075123 ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 22 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 800307-5121 800307-5123 800308-5202 800308-5402 800310-1413 800310-1420 800310-5012 800310-5013 800311-1113 800401-5113 800406-1612 800408-0902 800408-1308 800409-1103 800409-1113 800409-5002 800409-5503 800410-3002 800410-3003 800410-5101 800411-1702 800412-2002 800412-2102 800504-0603 800505-1003 V01 800507-0703 800507-0803 800507-5003 800507-5103 810508-1708 810509-0900 810509-2703 810509-2800 810509-3001 810511-0713 810511-0901 V01 810511-0911 V01 810511-0921 V01 810511-5013 TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP 800307A 800307A 800308A 800308A 800310A 800310A 800310A 800310A 800311A 800401A 800406A 800408A 800408A 800409A 800409A 800409A 800409A 800410A 800410A 800410A 800411A 800412A 800412A 800504A 800505A 800507A 800507A 800507A 800507A 810508A 810509A 810509A 810509A 810509A 810511A 810511A 810511A 810511A 810511A ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 23 8003075121 8003075123 8003085202 8003085402 8003101413 8003101420 8003105012 8003105013 8003111113 8004015113 8004061612 8004080902 8004081308 8004091103 8004091113 8004095002 8004095503 8004103002 8004103003 8004105101 8004111702 8004122002 8004122102 8005040603 8005051003 8005070703 8005070803 8005075003 8005075103 8105081708 8105090900 8105092703 8105092800 8105093001 8105110713 8105110901 8105110911 8105110921 8105115013 8003075123 8003075123 8003085402 8003085402 8003105013 8003105013 8003105013 8003105013 8003111113 8004015233 8004061873 8004081308 8004081308 8004095503 8004095503 8004095503 8004095503 8004105101 8004105101 8004105101 8004111702 8004122102 8004122102 8005042602 8005051003 8005075103 8005075103 8005075103 8005075103 8105081708 8105095201 8105095201 8105095201 8105095201 8105115013 8105115013 8105115013 8105115013 8105115013 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 810512-0112 V01 810512-0122 V01 810512-5012 810602-1703 810604-1000 810607-3103 810607-3113 810607-3123 810607-3133 810607-5003 810607-5013 810608-5312 810608-5402 810608-5402V 810609-0503 810610-0102 V01 810610-0302 V01 810610-0302 V02 810610-2102 810612-1902 810701-0500 810701-1503 810701-5013 810701-5100 810701-5110 810701-5202 810702-1524 810702-1534 810702-2401 810706-0423 810706-0523 810706-0533 810706-0543 810706-0623 810708-2002 810708-3003 810708-3013 810708-3023 810708-3103 TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP 810512A 810512A 810512A 810602A 810604A 810607A 810607A 810607A 810607A 810607A 810607A 810608A 810608A 810608A 810609A 810610A 810610A 810610A 810610A 810612A 810701A 810701A 810701A 810701A 810701A 810701A 810702A 810702A 810702A 810706A 810706A 810706A 810706A 810706A 810708A 810708A 810708A 810708A 810708A ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 24 8105120112 8105120122 8105125012 8106021703 8106041000 8106073103 8106073113 8106073123 8106073133 8106075003 8106075013 8106085312 8106085402 8106085402 8106090503 8106100102 8106100302 8106100302 8106102102 8106121902 8107010500 8107011503 8107015013 8107015100 8107015110 8107015202 8107021524 8107021534 8107022401 8107060423 8107060523 8107060533 8107060543 8107060623 8107082002 8107083003 8107083013 8107083023 8107083103 8105125012 8105125012 8105125012 8106021703 8106041000 8106075013 8106075013 8106075013 8106075013 8106075013 8106075013 8106085402 8106085402 8106085402 8106090503 8106102102 8106102102 8106102102 8106102102 8106121902 8107015202 8107015202 8107015202 8107015202 8107015202 8107015202 8107022401 8107022401 8107022401 8107062104 8107062104 8107062104 8107062104 8107062104 8107083103 8107083103 8107083103 8107083103 8107083103 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 810709-2703 810710-0403 810710-0413 810711-1201 810711-5002 810711-5012 810711-5102 810711-5112 810712-2102 810712-2402 810712-5002 810712-5002V 810712-5003 810712-5012 810712-5022 810801-0603 810801-0613 810801-0643 810801-1703 810801-1713 810801-1733 810801-1743 810802-2213 810802-2223 810802-2233 810802-2243 810802-2253 810804-3003 810804-3013 810804-3023 814262-0000 814262-0001 820006-0200 820006-0201 820006-0202 820006-0203 820006-0204 820006-0205 820009-1100 TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP 810709A 810710A 810710A 810711A 810711A 810711A 810711A 810711A 810712A 810712A 810712A 810712A 810712A 810712A 810712A 810801A 810801A 810801A 810801A 810801A 810801A 810801A 810802A 810802A 810802A 810802A 810802A 810804A 810804A 810804A 814262A 814262A 820006A 820006A 820006A 820006A 820006A 820006A 820009A ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 25 8107092703 8107100403 8107100413 8107111201 8107115002 8107115012 8107115102 8107115112 8107122102 8107122402 8107125002 8107125002 8107125003 8107125012 8107125022 8108010603 8108010613 8108010643 8108011703 8108011713 8108011733 8108011743 8108022213 8108022223 8108022233 8108022243 8108022253 8108043003 8108043013 8108043023 8142620000 8142620001 8200060200 8200060201 8200060202 8200060203 8200060204 8200060205 8200091100 8107092703 8107100413 8107100413 8107115112 8107115112 8107115112 8107115112 8107115112 8107122102 8107122102 8107122102 8107122102 8107122102 8107122102 8107122102 8108010643 8108010643 8108010643 8108010643 8108010643 8108010643 8108010643 8108022253 8108022253 8108022253 8108022253 8108022253 8108043023 8108043023 8108043023 8142620001 8142620001 8200060205 8200060205 8200060205 8200060205 8200060205 8200060205 8200091100 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 830711-2304 830801-0704 840808-1301 840808-1301 V01 840808-1311 V01 840808-1321 V01 840809-0402 840809-0403 840809-0412 840809-0413 840809-0422 900305-2601 901688-0003 901689-0005 902158-0000 902159-0000 902159-0001 902159-0100 904255-0002 904255-0003 904255-0004 904255-0005 904284-0000 904300-0000 904308-0000 904315-0000 904318-0000 904335-0000 904339-0000 904340-0000 904341-0000 904343-0000 904345-0000 C46367-B300 C46367-B301 C5440D-3100 C6536C-0300 C6536E-4300 C6740D-3200 TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP 830711A 830801A 840808A 840808A 840808A 840808A 840809A 840809A 840809A 840809A 840809A 900305A 901688A 901689A 902158A 902159A 902159A 902159A 904255A 904255A 904255A 904255A 904284A 904300A 904308A 904315A 904318A 904335A 904339A 904340A 904341A 904343A 904345A C46367A C46367A C5440DA C6536CA C6536EA C6740DA ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 26 8307112304 8308010704 8408081301 8408081301 8408081311 8408081321 8408090402 8408090403 8408090412 8408090413 8408090422 9003052601 9016880003 9016890005 9021580000 9021590000 9021590001 9021590100 9042550002 9042550003 9042550004 9042550005 9042840000 9043000000 9043080000 9043150000 9043180000 9043350000 9043390000 9043400000 9043410000 9043430000 9043450000 C46367B300 C46367B301 C5440D3100 C6536C0300 C6536E4300 C6740D3200 8307112304 8308010704 8408081321 8408081321 8408081321 8408081321 8408090422 8408090422 8408090422 8408090422 8408090422 9003052601 9016880003 9016890005 9021580002 9021590100 9021590100 9021590100 9042550005 9042550005 9042550005 9042550005 9042840000 9043000000 9043080000 9043150000 9043180000 9043350000 9043390000 9043400000 9043410000 9043430000 9043450000 C46367B301 C46367B301 C5440D3100 C6536C0300 C6536E4300 C6740D3200 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C7737D-0100 C7737D-5200 C7737D-5300 C7740D-3201 C7740D-4200 C8048D-5200 C8048D-5201 C8048D-5300 C8048D-5301 C8048D-7300 E6032D-0100 E6034D-1100 E6740D-4200 E6740D-5100 E6740D-5200 E8033D-5000 E8033D-5100 E8048D-2200 E8442D-5100 E8442D-5101 E8442D-5200 E8450F-5101 L80452-5000 L80452-5001 L80452-5002 L80452-5003 L96542-5300 L96542-5301 L96542-5302 L96542-5303 S4833D-3201 S53406-B300 S5440D-3100 S6034C-1200 S6034D-1200 S6536D-3300 S6536E-4300 S65496-B300 S65496-B301 TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP C7737DA C7737DA C7737DA C7740DA C7740DA C8048DA C8048DA C8048DA C8048DA C8048DA E6032DA E6034DA E6740DA E6740DA E6740DA E8033DA E8033DA E8048DA E8442DA E8442DA E8442DA E8450FA L80452A L80452A L80452A L80452A L96542A L96542A L96542A L96542A S4833DA S53406A S5440DA S6034CA S6034DA S6536DA S6536EA S65496A S65496A ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 27 C7737D0100 C7737D5200 C7737D5300 C7740D3201 C7740D4200 C8048D5200 C8048D5201 C8048D5300 C8048D5301 C8048D7300 E6032D0100 E6034D1100 E6740D4200 E6740D5100 E6740D5200 E8033D5000 E8033D5100 E8048D2200 E8442D5100 E8442D5101 E8442D5200 E8450F5101 L804525000 L804525001 L804525002 L804525003 L965425300 L965425301 L965425302 L965425303 S4833D3201 S53406B300 S5440D3100 S6034C1200 S6034D1200 S6536D3300 S6536E4300 S65496B300 S65496B301 C7737D5300 C7737D5300 C7737D5300 C7740D4200 C7740D4200 C8048D5201 C8048D5201 C8048D5201 C8048D5201 C8048D5201 E6032D0100 E6034D1100 E6740D5200 E6740D5200 E6740D5200 E8033D5000 E8033D5000 E8048D2200 E8442D5101 E8442D5101 E8442D5101 E8450F5101 L804525003 L804525003 L804525003 L804525003 L965425303 L965425303 L965425303 L965425303 S4833D3201 S53406B300 S5440D3100 S6034C1200 S6034D1200 S6536D3300 S6536E4300 S65496B301 S65496B301 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 S6740C-1100 S6740D-3200 S6740D-4300 S7737D-5300 S7737E-01H0 S7757F-5300 S7938D-5300 S80452-5000 S80452-5001 S80452-5002 S8048D-3200 S8048D-5201 S8048D-5300 S8442D-5100 S8442D-6100 S8644C-1200 S8744D-11H0 S8744E-01H0 S96542-5300 S96542-5301 S96542-5302 S9654D-5300 TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP S6740CA S6740DA S6740DA S7737DA S7737EA S7757FA S7938DA S80452A S80452A S80452A S8048DA S8048DA S8048DA S8442DA S8442DA S8644CA S8744DA S8744EA S96542A S96542A S96542A S9654DA S6740C1100 S6740D3200 S6740D4300 S7737D5300 S7737E01H0 S7757F5300 S7938D5300 S804525000 S804525001 S804525002 S8048D3200 S8048D5201 S8048D5300 S8442D5100 S8442D6100 S8644C1200 S8744D11H0 S8744E01H0 S965425300 S965425301 S965425302 S9654D5300 S6740C1100 S6740D3200 S6740D3200 S7737D5300 S7737E01H0 S7757F5300 S7938D5300 S804525002 S804525002 S804525002 S8048D5300 S8048D5300 S8048D5300 S8442D5100 S8442D5100 S8644C1200 S8744D11H0 S8744E01H0 S965425302 S965425302 S965425302 S9654D5300 17 18 emno 19 20 ver LINE 21 22 pdname 23 24 25 ehno 26 27 28 bodyname Also known as part number or the product model number for the use of external sales use. Version Product line Also known as Elan number, the internal product designation. One Elan no. can have multiple corresponding “emno” due to sales of by different sales department. One Elan no. can also have multiple corresponding “ehno” due to different sources of supply. Normally refers to the IC material number, or the semi-complete component number. One “ehno” can have multiple corresponding “emno” due to different packagings or customers. One “emno” can have multiple corresponding “ehno” due to different versions or different sources of foundry supply. Reference from the project name. In principle, Elan no. will use the same “bodyname”, but it is still possible that one “bodyname” can have different Elan Nos. ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 28 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 INTERROGATORY NO. 13: 2 6 Separately for each product or design the identification of which is requested by Interrogatory No. 12, describe in detail each sale, license, or other instance in which a customer or other third party has obtained rights to the product or design, including inter alia the name and address of the customer or third party, the date on which the third party or customer first obtained rights to the product or design, what software, hardware or know-how were provided by Elan, and all written or oral communications between Elan and the customer or third party concerning the design, operation, structure, testing, use or maintenance of the product or design (including documents and persons with knowledge). 7 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 13: 3 4 5 8 9 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 10 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 11 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan also objects to this 12 Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this 13 matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects 14 to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 15 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 16 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that no customer or 17 third party has “obtained rights” to any product or design, as Elan understands that term as used in 18 Interrogatory No. 13. 19 INTERROGATORY NO. 14: 20 21 Separately for each product or design the identification of which is requested by Interrogatory No. 12, describe in detail each individual that participated in the design or development of that product or design and their role in the design or development. 22 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 14: 23 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 24 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 25 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 26 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan also objects to this 27 Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this 28 matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 29 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 2 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 3 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan understands the following 4 individuals to have participated in the design or development of the products identified in response to 5 Interrogatory No. 12: 6 Name Title Yang, Wei-Wen (Eric) Sr. Manager Wu, Wan-Ling (Winnie) Research and Development Asst. 9 Wu, Teng-Yen (Draco) Sr. Manager 10 Wu, Chih-Lung (Jacky) Sr. Electrical Technology Manager 11 Chen, Te-Jung (Darren) Senior Electrical Engineer Chen, Jian-Wei (Leo) Software Engineer Kuo, Jui-Ting (Jennie) Research and Development Asst. Lin, Yen-Yo (Tom) Linux Software Engineer 14 Lin, Song-Yi (Steven) Electrical Engineer 15 Lee, Yu-Tien (Alex) Electrical Engineer 16 Ho, Yi-Hsiang (Peter) FAE Engineer Chuang, Ying-Jie (Roger) Windows Software Engineer 7 8 12 13 17 Wei, Wei-Feng (Giorgio) Software Engineer 18 Hsu, Hsin-Fu (Samuel) Firmware Engineer 19 Huang, Kuo-Ming (Aaron) Firmware Engineer 20 Wang, Kuo-Tai (Miller) Electrical Engineer 21 Tsai, Po-Ming (Koven) Electrical Engineer Chang, Wen-Hong (Wilson) Electrical Engineer 22 Eric Chung Director 23 Mai, Wei-Kuo Supervisor, Firmware Development 24 Wu, Tsung-Hsiao Director 25 Pai, Charles Director 26 Chiu, Yen-Chang (Godwin) Director Tang, Maco 27 Assistant Manager Roven Lee Assistant Manager 28 ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 30 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 INTERROGATORY NO. 15: 2 Separately for each product or design the identification of which is requested by Interrogatory No. 12, state the total quantity of the product or design made, used, sold, offered for sale, imported, exported, leased, distributed, or licensed in the United States, and the gross and net revenues and profits derived from each such activity (including documents and persons with knowledge). 3 4 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 15: 5 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 6 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 7 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 8 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan also objects to this 9 Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this 10 matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Elan also objects 11 to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 12 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. 13 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan states that it does not know the 14 total quantity of products made, used, sold, offered for sale, imported, exported, leased, distributed, or 15 licensed in the United States, or the gross or net revenues or profits derived from each such activity, if 16 any. Elan has not made, used, sold, offered for sale, imported, exported, leased, distributed, or licensed 17 in the United States any of its products identified in the response to Interrogatory No. 12. 18 INTERROGATORY NO. 16: 19 20 For each claim of each Apple Patent-in-Suit that you contend is not infringed by Elan Accused Products, describe in detail the factual basis of such contention. 21 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 16: 22 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan also 23 objects to this Interrogatory as seeking information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client 24 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other applicable privilege or protection. Elan 25 further objects to this Interrogatory as premature. 26 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it will retain an 27 expert to respond to Apple’s contention that Elan allegedly infringes the Apple Patents-in-Suit, and 28 will disclose its expert’s opinions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), upon issuance of a claim ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 31 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT) 1 construction order and in accordance with the Court’s schedule for expert discovery, once issued. Elan 2 further responds that each of the asserted claims of Apple Patents-in-Suit are invalid in light of the 3 prior art cited in Elan’s Invalidity Contentions. Because an invalid claim cannot be infringed, Elan 4 infringes none of the Apple Patents-in-Suit. 5 INTERROGATORY NO. 17: 6 Describe in detail Elan’s activities and business in the United States with regard to Elan Accused Products, including without limitation, marketing, sales, product development, and/or product support and instructions directed to or conducted in the United States by Elan, including without limitation by Elan’s ELAN Information Technology Group office in Cupertino, CA. 7 8 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 17: 9 Elan incorporates herein by reference each of its foregoing General Objections. Elan objects to 10 this Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to be treated as one interrogatory, as it contains 11 multiple subparts, and thus will be treated as multiple interrogatories against the maximum permissible. 12 Elan also objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome. Elan further objects to 13 this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information not relevant to any present claim or defense in this 14 matter and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, inter alia to the 15 extent it seeks information regarding ELAN Information Technology Group, an entity that is not a 16 party to this lawsuit. Elan also objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information protected 17 from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other 18 applicable privilege, immunity, or protection. Elan further objects to this Interrogatory as vague and 19 ambiguous with respect to the term “Elan’s activities and business in the Untied States.” 20 Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Elan responds that it has not sold in 21 the United States any touchpad products or any “Elan Accused Product.” Elan further responds that 22 Elan employees attended and exhibited products or product literature at the Computer Electronics 23 Show (“CES”) in Las Vegas in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Elan has already produced product literature at 24 at ELN117285 to ELN117309 that Elan employees displayed at CES, from which Apple can ascertain 25 further information responsive to this Interrogatory in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d). 26 Elan employees have also met with employees at Dell, Nokia, Logitech and Motorola in the 27 United States to discuss Elan’s products and technologies. Elan further responds that Elan Information 28 Technology Group has engaged in no activities or business in the United States related to any touchpad ELAN’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO APPLE’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 32 Case No. 5:09-cv-01531-RS (PVT)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?