Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 225

Declaration of Derek Walter In Support of Apple Inc.'s Motion to Compel (1) Discovery Relating to US Sales; (2) Documents Improperly Withheld on the Basis of Privilege; and (3) Inventor Depositions filed byApple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 3, # 3 Exhibit 5, # 4 Exhibit 6, # 5 Exhibit 7, # 6 Exhibit 9, # 7 Exhibit 10, # 8 Exhibit 15, # 9 Exhibit 22, # 10 Exhibit 24, # 11 Exhibit 28, # 12 Exhibit 29, # 13 Exhibit 30, # 14 Exhibit 31, # 15 Exhibit 32, # 16 Exhibit 33, # 17 Exhibit 36)(Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 5/31/2011)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 15 From: Bu, Jane [mailto:Jane.Bu@alston.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:15 PM To: Greenblatt, Nathan Cc: Apple Elan WGM Service; Elan Apple Team Subject: Deposition Notices Apple Issued to Elan Employees dated May 23 Nathan: I write in response to the deposition notices Apple issued to Elan employees on May 23. Daisuke Shudo, Roven Lee, Jimmy Liu and Phoenix Lin are no longer employed by Elan. As with the 353 patent inventors, Elan has no control over their availability to appear for a deposition and Alston+Bird is not currently representing any of these individuals. The last known addresses of these former employees are as follows: Roven Lee 李佳益 No. 87, Nan Men Road, South District, Taichung City, Taiwan 402 台中市南區南門里 30 鄰南門路 87 號 Jimmy Liu 劉智民 11F, No. 45, Pao Chung Road, Xindian District, New Taipei City, Taiwan 231 台北縣新店市寶興里寶中路 45 號 11 樓 Phoenix Lin 林維民 9F, No. 42, Lane 431, Ching Ping Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, Taiwan 235 台北縣中和市新南里 46 鄰景平路 431 巷 42 號 9 樓 Mr. Eric Yang, Draco Wu, and Leo Chen are all employees in the same product development group. We would expect them to have similar, if not identical, information regarding Elan's touchpad products. As such, we propose to make Mr. Eric Yang available for deposition first. Mr. Yang is the head of the department and, therefore, may be the most appropriate representative among them. If Mr. Yang were unable to answer questions on any relevant topic(s), we would agree to make Mr. Wu and/or Mr. Chen available for deposition, assuming they possess the information that Mr. Yang did not. We are also looking into Mr. Wen-Jen Chen and Mr. Nick Lin's availability. However, we would like to meet and confer regarding the locality of all of these depositions (as they related to Apple's counterclaims) and the scope of deposition with respect to Mr. Lin, a member of Elan's legal department. Most of what Mr. Lin knows will likely be privileged. We would like to explore ways for Apple to obtain nonprivileged information without having to call this witness, whose deposition will likely be muddled with disputes over privileges. Best, Jane H. Bu 1 Alston & Bird LLP 275 Middlefield Road | Suite 150 | Menlo Park, CA 94025 650-838-2019 Direct 650-838-2001 Fax ******************************************************* IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. ______________________________________________________ NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (404-8817000) or by electronic mail (postmaster@alston.com), and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?