Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD
Filing
212
MOTION to Compel filed by Fusion Garage PTE. LTD. Motion Hearing set for 10/18/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal. Responses due by 9/23/2011. Replies due by 9/30/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Request for Judicial Notice, # 3 Request for Judicial Notice, Ex. 1, # 4 Affidavit Sohn, # 5 Exhibit Sohn Ex. 1, # 6 Exhibit Sohn Ex. 2)(Pennypacker, Evette) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)
2
claudestern@quinnemanuel.com
Evette D. Pennypacker (Bar No. 203515)
3
evettepennypacker@quinnemanuel.com
Thomas R. Watson (Bar No. 227264)
4
tomwatson@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th floor
5 Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
6 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
7
Joshua L. Sohn (Bar No. 250105)
joshuasohn@quinnemanuel.com
8
Sam S. Stake (Bar No. 257916)
samstake@quinnemanuel.com
9 50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
10 Telephone:
(415) 875-6600
Facsimile:
(415) 875-6700
11
Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16 TECHCRUNCH, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, INC., a
17 Delaware corporation,
18
19
Plaintiffs,
vs.
20 FUSION GARAGE PTE LTD., a Singapore
company,
21
Defendant.
22
CASE NO. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG)
DEFENDANT FUSION GARAGE PTE
LTD.’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS
Date: October 18, 2011
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Paul Singh Grewal
Location: San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG)
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 201, Defendant Fusion Garage respectfully requests that the
2 Court take judicial notice of the following:
3
1.
Complaint in Jason Calacanis v. Techcrunch, No. CGC-10-505374 (San Francisco
4 Super. Ct. Nov. 12. 2010), attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
5
6
BASIS FOR REQUESTING JUDICIAL NOTICE
In ruling on Fusion Garage's Motion To Compel Production of Documents this Court may
7 take judicial notice of Exhibit 1 pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 201 because Exhibit 1 is a court filing
8 capable of accurate and ready determination. See Fed. R. Evid. 201; James v. Hubbard, Civil
9 Action No. 08-01857, 2010 WL 4901827 at *1 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2010) (stating that a court may
10 take judicial notice of court filings and other matters of public record).
11
12 DATED: September 9, 2011
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
13
14
15
16
/s/ Evette D. Pennypacker
Evette D. Pennypacker
Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE. Ltd.
By
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?