McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al
Filing
119
STIPULATION to Extent the Deadline for Defendants to Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Complaint by HTC Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rosemarie T. Ring, # 2 Proposed Order)(Ring, Rosemarie) (Filed on 11/11/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
GILLIAN L. WADE (SBN 229124)
SARA D. AVILA (SBN 263213)
MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP
2800 Donald Douglas Loop North
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Telephone: (310) 396-9600
Facsimile: (310) 396-9635
E-Mail: gwade@milsteinadelman.com;
savila@maklawyers.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Mary McKinney and
Nathan Nabors
HENRY WEISSMANN (SBN 132418)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone:
(213) 683-9100
Facsimile:
(213) 687-3702
E-mail: Henry.Weissmann@mto.com
STEVEN B.WEISBURD (No. 171490)
DECHERT LLP
300 West 6th Street, Suite 2010
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: 512.394.3000
Facsimile: 512.394.3001
E-Mail: steven.weisburd@dechert.com
Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.
7
8
9
10
MATTHEW L. LARRABEE (No. 97147)
DECHERT LLP
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94111-3513
Telephone: 415.262.4500
Facsimile: 415.262.4555
E-Mail: matthew.larrabee@dechert.com
11
12
13
14
ROSEMARIE T. RING (SBN 220769)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2907
Telephone: (415) 512-4000
Facsimile: (415) 512-4077
E-Mail: Rose.Ring@mto.com
15
Attorneys for Defendant HTC Corporation
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN JOSE DIVISION
20
21
In re Google Phone Litigation
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-01177-EJD
(Consolidated with No. 5:10-CV-03897 EJD)
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO REPLY IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION TO DISMISS
23
24
25
26
27
28
12946794.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C 10-01177 EJD
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, Defendants Google, Inc. and HTC
3
Corporation shall have until November 28, 2011, to file a reply in support of their Motion to
4
Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint (Docket No. 113).
5
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
DATED:
By:
9
HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12946794.1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C 10-01177 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?