Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1043

Declaration of Nathan Sabri in Support of #1042 Opposition/Response to Motion, #1041 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple Inc.'s Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Enforce April 12, 2012 Order filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27)(Related document(s) #1042 , #1041 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/5/2012)

DECLARATION OF NATHAN SABRI IN
SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITIONS TO
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND
MOTION TO ENFORCE

EXHIBIT 14

From:

Mazza, Mia

Sent:

Sunday, April 15, 2012 5:55 PM

To:

'Diane Hutnyan'

Cc:

AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; [e-mail]

Subject:

RE: Apple v. Samsung Proposal Regarding 796 Transcripts

Attachments: 2012-04-15 Ltr Mazza to Hutnyan re 796 transcripts.pdf

Diane:
In light of Judge Grewal’s April 12, 2012, Order, Apple agrees that all transcripts of depositions
taken in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337TA-796 (“ITC 796”) are deemed produced in Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK
(PSG) (N.D. Cal.) (the “N.D. Cal. case”).
Apple reserves its right to challenge admissibility of ITC 796 transcripts in the N.D. Cal. case.
Regards,
Mia Mazza
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
[phone] fax

From: Diane Hutnyan [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 3:36 PM
To: Mazza, Mia
Cc: Samsung v. Apple; [e-mail]; AppleMoFo
Subject: Apple v. Samsung Proposal Regarding 796 Transcripts

Dear Mia,
In light of the Court’s ruling that 796 deposition transcripts are relevant and must be produced, and
given that rebuttal expert reports are due on Monday, will Apple agree that the 796 deposition
transcripts are immediately deemed produced in this action? This would prevent both sides from having
to do supplemental reports and an additional round of expert depositions when the materials are
produced later this month. Please let us know today.
Thank you.

Diane Cafferata Hutnyan

| partner | quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp

865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Direct: [phone]
Main Phone: [phone]

Main Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Web: www.quinnemanuel.com
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dianehutnyan

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as
such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible
for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.