Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1043

Declaration of Nathan Sabri in Support of #1042 Opposition/Response to Motion, #1041 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple Inc.'s Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Enforce April 12, 2012 Order filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27)(Related document(s) #1042 , #1041 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/5/2012)

Download PDF
DECLARATION OF NATHAN SABRI IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITIONS TO SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND MOTION TO ENFORCE EXHIBIT 9 quinn emanuel trial lawyers | los angeles 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 | TEL: (213) 443-3000 FAX: (213) 443-3100 February 8, 2012 Jason Bartlett Morrison & Foerster LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Re: Apple v. Samsung Elecs. Co. et al., Case No. 11-cv-1846 LHK (N.D. Cal.) Dear Jason: I write regarding Samsung’s efforts to obtain materials from other actions involving the patentsin-suit, patents related to the patents-in-suit, and any other cases having a technological nexus to the issues in this case. We have not received any list from you but have identified the following cases thus far to advance our discussions: • Investigation Regarding Certain Electronic Devices (Nokia v. Apple), 337-TA-701 (ITC) • Investigation of Certain Electronic Devices with Multi-Touch Enabled Touchpad and Touchscreens (Elan Microelectronics Corp. v. Apple), 337-TA-714 • Investigation In the Matter of Certain Wireless Communication Devices (Motorola v. Apple), 337-TA-745 (ITC) • Investigation of Certain Mobile Devices And Related Software (Apple v. Motorola), 337-TA-750 (ITC) • Investigation Regarding Certain Electronic Devices (Samsung v. Apple), 337-TA- quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp NEW YORK | 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10010-1601 | TEL (212) 849-7000 FAX (212) 849-7100 California Street, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4788 | TEL (415) 875-6600 FAX (415) 875-6700 SILICON VALLEY | 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 | TEL (650) 801-5000 FAX (650) 801-5100 CHICAGO | 500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510 | TEL (312) 705-7400 FAX (312) 705-7401 SAN FRANCISCO | 50 WASHINGTON, DC | 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 825, Washington, District of Columbia 20004-2400 | TEL (202) 538-8000 FAX (202) 538-8100 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7EG, United Kingdom | TEL +44(0) 20 7653 2000 FAX +44(0) 20 7653 2100 TOKYO | NBF Hibiya Building, 25F, 1-1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, Japan | TEL +81 3 5510 1711 FAX +81 3 5510 1712 MANNHEIM | Mollstraße 42, 68165 Mannheim, Germany | TEL +49(0) 621 43298 6000 FAX +49(0) 621 43298 6100 MOSCOW | Voentorg Building, 3rd Floor, 10 Vozdvizhenka Street, Moscow 125009, Russia | TEL +7 495 797 3666 FAX +7 495 797 3667 LONDON | 16 794 (ITC) • Investigation Regarding Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices (Samsung v. Apple), 337-TA-796 (ITC) • Investigation Regarding Certain Portable Electronic Devices (Apple v. High Tech Computer Corp.), 337-TA-797 (ITC) • Nokia v. Apple, 09-cv-00791 (D. Del.) • Elan Microelectronics Corp. v. Apple, Inc., 09-cv-01531 (N.D. Cal.) • Apple v. High Tech Computer Corp., 10-cv-00167 (D. Del.) • Apple Inc. v. Motorola Inc. et al., 10-cv-00661 (W.D. Wis.) • Apple Inc. v. Motorola Inc. et al., 10-cv-00662 (W.D. Wis.) • Smart Audio Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc., 1:12-cv-00134 (D. Del.) First, please confirm that you will provide by February 8 a complete list of actions that fall in the above category. Second, for each of these actions, including the ones listed above, please identify any parties whose confidential business information may be implicated, so that Samsung will be able to clear the production of any such confidential information as soon as possible. Third, please confirm that you will produce all relevant documents from these actions within 2 days of Samsung clearing the production of confidential information. Finally, please provide Bates numbers for any such documents you produce, and identify the proceeding associated with the Bates numbers. Kind regards, /s/ Diane C. Hutnyan 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?