Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1057
Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #999 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal , #1007 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment and Documents in Support Thereto , Samsung's Oppotiion to Apple's Motion to Strike, and Samsung's Opposition to Motion to Exclude filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K)(Related document(s) #999 , #1007 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL (DKT. NOS. 999 AND
1007)
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3156607
1
2
In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Samsung has
filed an administrative motion for an order to seal the following documents:
3
1.
The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support
4
of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung’s Expert Reports
5
(“Martin Declaration”) (Dkt. Nos. 999, 1011) and Exhibits 3, 7, 8, 9, 12-16, and 20 thereto;
6
2.
The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of James Ward in Support
7
of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung’s Expert Reports
8
(“Ward Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 1014) and Exhibits H-J, L, T, and Y thereto;
9
3.
The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Richard D. Wesel, Ph.D.
10
in Support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Wesel
11
Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 1003) and Exhibit M thereto; and
12
4.
The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support
13
of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung’s Experts
14
(“Martin Daubert Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 999) and Exhibit N thereto.
15
Having considered the arguments and the papers submitted, and GOOD CAUSE
16
HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS Samsung’s Administrative Motions to
17
File under Seal (Dkt. Nos. 999 and 1007). The above-referenced document shall be filed under
18
seal.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: _______________________
22
23
______________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3156607
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?