Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1057

Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #999 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal , #1007 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment and Documents in Support Thereto , Samsung's Oppotiion to Apple's Motion to Strike, and Samsung's Opposition to Motion to Exclude filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K)(Related document(s) #999 , #1007 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/7/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL (DKT. NOS. 999 AND
1007)

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3156607

1
2

In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Samsung has
filed an administrative motion for an order to seal the following documents:

3

1.

The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support

4

of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung’s Expert Reports

5

(“Martin Declaration”) (Dkt. Nos. 999, 1011) and Exhibits 3, 7, 8, 9, 12-16, and 20 thereto;

6

2.

The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of James Ward in Support

7

of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung’s Expert Reports

8

(“Ward Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 1014) and Exhibits H-J, L, T, and Y thereto;

9

3.

The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Richard D. Wesel, Ph.D.

10

in Support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Wesel

11

Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 1003) and Exhibit M thereto; and

12

4.

The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support

13

of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung’s Experts

14

(“Martin Daubert Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 999) and Exhibit N thereto.

15

Having considered the arguments and the papers submitted, and GOOD CAUSE

16

HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS Samsung’s Administrative Motions to

17

File under Seal (Dkt. Nos. 999 and 1007). The above-referenced document shall be filed under

18

seal.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
Dated: _______________________
22
23

______________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3156607

1