Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1057

Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #999 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal , #1007 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment and Documents in Support Thereto , Samsung's Oppotiion to Apple's Motion to Strike, and Samsung's Opposition to Motion to Exclude filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K)(Related document(s) #999 , #1007 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/7/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit E EXHIBIT 13 FILED UNDER SEAL Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 2 3 4 5 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 11 vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 12 13 Defendants. ---------------------------- ) ) ) ) ) NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 14 15 16 *** CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY *** 17 18 19 20 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MATTHEW ROHRBACH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2011 21 22 23 24 25 Reported By: Yvonne Fennelly, CCRR, CSR No. 5495 JOB NO. 43006 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 6 1 MATTHEW ROHRBACH, 2 having been first duly sworn was 3 examined and testified as follows: 4 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: 5 6 You may proceed. EXAMINATION BY MR. ZELLER: 7 Q. Good morning. 8 A. Good morning. 9 Q. Please state and spell your full name 10 for the record. 11 12 A. R-O-H-R-B-A-C-H. 13 14 Matthew Rohrbach, M-A-T-T-H-E-W, Q. And have you ever gone by any other name? 15 A. No. 16 Q. You're currently an Apple employee? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. You're an industrial designer? 19 A. Yes. 20 Q. How long have you been working as an 21 industrial designer for Apple? 22 A. For Apple, 13 years. 23 Q. So that's approximately the 1988 time 24 period? 25 A. '98, yeah. TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 94 1 A. TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 95 1 11 Q. Let me show you what's previously 12 marked as Exhibit 8, which is United States 13 Design Patent 504,889. 14 I take it, at some point, you became 15 aware that there was a dispute between Samsung 16 and Apple? 17 18 MS. TAYLOR: question. 19 20 21 It's a yes-or-no THE WITNESS: Yes. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. At any time prior to the time you 22 became aware that there was a dispute between 23 Apple and Samsung, in other words, litigation in 24 court that was going on, had you seen the '889 25 design patent? TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 96 1 A. I don't recall. 2 Q. You are listed as a named inventor 3 here. 4 You see that? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. What about the design that's shown 7 here in Exhibit 889 was new or original or 8 different from the prior art? 9 MS. TAYLOR: Objection; lacks 10 foundation, calls for speculation, also appears 11 to be seeking a legal conclusion, and it's vague 12 and ambiguous. 13 14 15 THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Was this design that is shown here in 16 Exhibit 8 different from tablet designs that 17 were already in existence? 18 19 MS. TAYLOR: for speculation, it's vague and ambiguous. 20 21 22 23 Lacks foundation, calls THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Well, you're named as an inventor; right? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. Well, what did you and the other TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 97 1 inventors named here invent that's shown here in 2 Exhibit 8, the '889 patent? 3 4 MS. TAYLOR: Objection; it calls for a legal conclusion and lacks foundation. 5 THE WITNESS: 6 design. 7 We did the industrial BY MR. ZELLER: 8 Q. 9 Well, what was inventive about it? 10 MS. TAYLOR: Objection; that calls for a legal conclusion, and lacks foundation. 11 THE WITNESS: 12 know exactly. 13 The shape. I don't BY MR. ZELLER: 14 Q. Design elements. Do you know generally? 15 MS. TAYLOR: 16 THE WITNESS: 17 I don't recall. I don't know. 18 Asked and answered. BY MR. ZELLER: 19 Q. What about the shape of the design 20 that's shown here in the '889 design patent, in 21 your view, was inventive? 22 MS. TAYLOR: Objection; it calls for 23 a legal conclusion, it's vague and ambiguous, 24 and it lacks foundation, calls for speculation. 25 THE WITNESS: I don't know what the TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 98 1 document is trying to get across. 2 BY MR. ZELLER: 3 Q. And when you say "the document," 4 you're talking about the drawings and the other 5 information here in the '889 design patent? 6 A. Correct. 7 Q. Is that saying because you don't have 8 9 an understanding of what's being shown here? A. I was familiar with the design at the 10 time, but I don't know what the document is 11 trying to communicate. 12 Q. Well, as you sit here now, based on 13 everything that you know, do you have any 14 knowledge or understanding as to what, if 15 anything, was inventive about the design shown 16 here in the '889 design patent? 17 MS. TAYLOR: Calls for a legal 18 conclusion, and lacks foundation, and it calls 19 for speculation. 20 THE WITNESS: No, I don't know what 21 the document is trying to communicate. 22 BY MR. ZELLER: 23 Q. Based on all the information that you 24 have available to you, was there anything about 25 the shape that you consider to be new or TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 99 1 inventive as of the time that this invention was 2 created? 3 4 MS. TAYLOR: a legal conclusion, and lacks foundation. 5 6 7 Objection; it calls for THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Directing your attention to Figure 1 8 of the '889 design patent, you'll see that this 9 is an angled front view of the design. 10 Do you see that? 11 A. I think so. 12 Q. And you'll see that there is an 13 Figure 1. interior rectangular shape on the front surface. 14 Do you see that? 15 A. Yes. 16 Q. Are those dotted lines or dash lines? 17 18 MS. TAYLOR: itself, and it lacks foundation. 19 20 21 The document speaks for THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Does that set of rectangular lines 22 that runs on the interior of the front depict 23 anything? 24 MS. TAYLOR: 25 and calls for a legal conclusion. Calls for speculation, TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 100 1 2 THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: 3 Q. Does that interior rectangular line 4 indicate the difference between the active area 5 of the display screen and the nonactive area? 6 7 MS. TAYLOR: and it calls for a legal conclusion. 8 9 Calls for speculation, THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: 10 Q. Do you have any knowledge or 11 information as to what that interior rectangular 12 line depicts? 13 MS. TAYLOR: 14 THE WITNESS: 15 Same objections. I would be guessing. BY MR. ZELLER: 16 Q. And why is it you can't ascertain 17 that? 18 drawings here to tell you? 19 20 21 Is there not enough information in the A. I don't understand the language of the patent drawing. Q. Well, I'm not asking you to 22 understand -- I'm not asking about the language 23 of patent drawings. 24 inventor, your understanding of this design 25 patent. I'm asking you as an TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 101 1 2 3 Do you understand that? A. Do I understand that you're asking me as an inventor listed on this document? 4 Q. Right. 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Directing your attention to Figure 1, 7 you'll see that in certain parts of the 8 perimeter, of the front, there is a darker line 9 that runs on that perimeter. 10 Do you see that? 11 A. I think so. 12 Q. And so that there's no doubt about 13 this, you can see it most clearly as it runs on 14 this bottom portion of the drawing. 15 Do you see that part right there? 16 A. Okay. 17 Q. And this is Figure 1 we're talking 18 about. 19 A. Yes. 20 Q. Do you know what that darker line 21 depicts? 22 A. No. 23 Q. Do you have any knowledge or 24 25 information as to what that darker line depicts? MS. TAYLOR: Calls for speculation, TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 102 1 lacks foundation. 2 3 THE WITNESS: No. BY MR. ZELLER: 4 Q. Does that darker area depict the 5 ventilation area that we talked about earlier 6 for the tablet? 7 MS. TAYLOR: Same objections. 8 THE WITNESS: I don't know. 9 BY MR. ZELLER: 10 11 Q. one way or another? 12 13 It might, might not, you don't know MS. TAYLOR: Mischaracterizes his testimony. 14 THE WITNESS: 15 line depicts. 16 I don't know what that BY MR. ZELLER: 17 Q. Right. 18 So it might depict the ventilation 19 area, it might not, you don't know, you don't 20 have an understanding; right? 21 22 MS. TAYLOR: Mischaracterizes his testimony, asked and answered. 23 THE WITNESS: 24 that line depicts. 25 Yeah, I don't know what /// TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 103 1 BY MR. ZELLER: 2 Q. Well, is it the ventilation area? 3 MS. TAYLOR: 4 calls for speculation. 5 6 THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: 7 8 Asked and answered, Q. Are you denying that that's the ventilation area? 9 MS. TAYLOR: Mischaracterizes his 10 testimony, and unduly argumentative. 11 for a legal conclusion. 12 THE WITNESS: 13 I don't know what that line depicts. 14 Also calls BY MR. ZELLER: 15 16 Q. You don't know one way or another; right? 17 MS. TAYLOR: 18 now you're harassing the witness. 19 THE WITNESS: 20 I don't know what it depicts. 21 Asked and answered, and BY MR. ZELLER: 22 Q. Can you tell me one way or another 23 whether it depicts the ventilation area? 24 no? 25 MS. TAYLOR: Yes or Asked and answered, TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 104 1 calls for speculation, and you're being 2 harassing. 3 4 THE WITNESS: I don't know what that line depicts. 5 MR. ZELLER: 6 Can you read back my question? 7 I ask that you focus on the All right. 8 particular question I have asked you and answer 9 that question, please. 10 (Record read.) 11 MS. TAYLOR: 12 objections, too, please? 13 14 Can you read the (Record read.) BY MR. ZELLER: 15 Q. So please answer my question. 16 MS. TAYLOR: 17 THE WITNESS: 18 Which question? Can you read the question one more time, please? 19 (Record read.) 20 MS. TAYLOR: Asked and answered, 21 calls for speculation, calls for a legal 22 conclusion. 23 THE WITNESS: 24 or the other. 25 No, I can't say one way /// TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 105 1 2 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Directing your attention to Figure 2. 3 You'll see on the interior of the drawing there, 4 there are those three sets of diagonal lines. 5 Do you see that? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. What do those represent or depict? 8 9 MS. TAYLOR: conclusion, and speculation, lacks foundation. 10 11 12 THE WITNESS: Q. Do you have any understanding? MS. TAYLOR: 14 THE WITNESS: 16 I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: 13 15 Calls for a legal Same objections. No. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. 17 All right. Directing your attention to Figure 4 18 of the '889 design patent, you'll see that the 19 diagonal lines don't appear on the interior of 20 Figure 4. 21 Do you see that? 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. All right. 24 25 And do you have any explanation or understanding as to why those diagonal lines TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 106 1 appear on Figure 2 but not on Figure 4? 2 3 MS. TAYLOR: conclusion, and speculation, lacks foundation. 4 5 6 Calls for a legal THE WITNESS: No. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Is the back surface of the tablet 7 design that's being depicted here on the '889 8 design patent showing a substantially flat back? 9 MS. TAYLOR: Calls for speculation, 10 calls for a legal conclusion, and lacks 11 foundation. 12 13 14 THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Does the design that's being depicted 15 here in the '889 design patent show a flat, 16 clear front surface? 17 18 MS. TAYLOR: conclusion, speculation, and lacks foundation. 19 20 21 Calls for a legal THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Directing your attention to Figure 9 22 of the '889 design patent, you'll see that the 23 portion of the device that is the top of the 24 device as being held by the person in the 25 outline here and is to the furthest right of the TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 107 1 drawing, when you look at it, you'll see there 2 is kind of a wedge shape there on the side. 3 MS. TAYLOR: A web shape, what? 4 MR. ZELLER: A wedge shape, MS. TAYLOR: I couldn't hear the 5 W-E-D-G-E. 6 7 word. Thank you. 8 9 10 THE WITNESS: Okay. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Do you know if that's the design for 11 the tablet that is being depicted here on the 12 '889 design patent has a side that is wedged 13 shaped? 14 15 MS. TAYLOR: for a legal conclusion, and speculation. 16 17 Lacks foundation, calls THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: 18 Q. 19 that regard? 20 A. No. 21 Q. Directing your attention to Figure 6. You don't have any understanding in 22 You'll see that there is what's generally 23 depicted as a hole there on the right side. 24 25 A. Okay. I see I think what you're indicating. TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 108 1 Q. 2 3 MS. TAYLOR: 6 THE WITNESS: Q. depicted here in the '889 design patent? MS. TAYLOR: 13 14 THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Do you know why that, that hole doesn't show up in Figure 9? 15 MS. TAYLOR: 16 THE WITNESS: 17 Legal conclusion, calls for speculation, and lacks foundation. 11 12 All right. Is that part of the design that is 9 10 I don't know. BY MR. ZELLER: 7 8 Calls for a legal conclusion, and speculation, lacks foundation. 4 5 What is that? Calls for speculation. No. BY MR. ZELLER: 18 Q. 19 explanation? 20 21 MS. TAYLOR: 24 25 Calls for speculation, asked and answered. 22 23 Do you have any understanding or THE WITNESS: No. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. You'll see, generally speaking, that these figures depict what we roughly call a TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 109 1 connector port, sometimes people call it a 2 30-pin connector if you specifically look at 3 Figure 8? 4 5 MS. TAYLOR: Which figure? BY MR. ZELLER: 6 Q. Do you see that? 7 A. The rectangles in Figure 8? 8 Q. Right. 9 Do you see that? 10 A. I see those rectangles, yeah. 11 Q. Do you know what they are? 12 13 MS. TAYLOR: conclusion. 14 15 16 17 THE WITNESS: Q. Do you have any knowledge or understanding as to what they are? MS. TAYLOR: Same, and lacks foundation. 20 21 No. BY MR. ZELLER: 18 19 Calls for a legal THE WITNESS: No. BY MR. ZELLER: 22 Q. 23 Exhibit 841. 24 25 If we could go back for a moment to You'll agree with me that the mockup that's depicted here shows a port on one side, TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580 Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 110 1 it's in the shape, generally, of a hole as well 2 as something people call a connector or 30-pin 3 connector; right? 4 MS. TAYLOR: 5 a particular page? 6 Are you directing him to BY MR. ZELLER: 7 Q. Well, it is shown in various 8 perspectives, but you could look at 18780 and 9 18781. 10 Do you see what I'm referring to? 11 A. I see those pages. 12 Q. Well, let's break it down, then. 13 14 Do you see here on 18780 there is that darker smaller rectangular region? 15 A. Yes. 16 Q. Is it your understanding, generally 17 speaking, that that is a connector, something 18 sometimes people call a 30-pin connector? 19 20 MS. TAYLOR: Objection; it's vague and ambiguous, lacks foundation. 21 THE WITNESS: As best as I can tell 22 in this photograph, that's what I would guess 23 that it is. 24 BY MR. ZELLER: 25 Q. It's your best understanding based on TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877)-702-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?