Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 11

Declaration of Jason Bartlett in Support of #10 MOTION to Expedite Discovery filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #10 ) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 4/19/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) HMcElhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) MJacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) JTaylor@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) JasonBartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. Plaintiff, 4:11-cv-01846-LB [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Date: May 3, 2011 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Judge: 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has moved the Court for an order to expedite discovery 22 regarding certain products soon to be released by Defendant Samsung Telecommunications 23 America, LLC (“Samsung”). 24 Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and finding 25 good cause therefore, the Court hereby grants Apple’s Motion to Expedite Discovery, and orders 26 Samsung to produce the following documents and things by May 17, 2011: 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY sf-2983615 1 (1) a domestic production model1 of the Galaxy S2, along with its commercial packaging 2 and initial release marketing materials; 3 (2) a domestic production model of the Galaxy Tab 8.9, along with its commercial 4 packaging and initial release marketing materials; 5 (3) a domestic production model of the Galaxy Tab 10.1, along with its commercial 6 packaging and initial release marketing materials; 7 (4) a domestic production model of the Infuse 4G, along with its commercial packaging 8 and initial release marketing materials; 9 (5) a domestic production model of the 4G LTE (or “Droid Charge”), along with its 10 commercial packaging and initial release marketing materials; and 11 (6) documents relating to any copying of design elements of, or attempts to design around 12 Apple’s intellectual property relating to, the iPhone 4, iPad, and iPad 2. 13 In addition, by May 19, 2011, Samsung shall make available for deposition in the United 14 States a 30(b)(6) corporate witness on the following topics: 15 (a) The design of the shell and graphical user interface of the Galaxy S2, Galaxy Tab 8.9, 16 Galaxy Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, and 4G LTE; 17 (b) Any copying of design elements from the iPhone 4, iPad, and iPad 2; and 18 (c) Any attempts to design around the iPhone 4, iPad, and iPad 2. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: ___________________, 2011 By: Honorable ________________ 23 24 25 26 1 27 “Domestic Production Model” means a final, commercial version of a product to be sold in the United States. 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY sf-2983615

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?