Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1121

*** EXHIBIT A FILED IN ERROR WITH CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. DOCUMENT LOCKED. *** MOTION for Leave to File Objection To Reply Evidence filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Declaration Of Jason R. Bartlett In Support Of Apples Administrative Motion For Leave To File Objection To Reply Evidence, #3 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/22/2012) Modified on 6/25/2012 (fff, COURT STAFF). Modified text on 6/27/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Exhibit A

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff,

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
APPLE’S OBJECTION TO REPLY
EVIDENCE

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
1
APPLE INC.’S OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

sf-3162599

1

OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE

2
Apple objects to Samsung’s use of Exhibit 25 to the Declaration of Bill Trac in Support of
3
Samsung’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 1068-25).
4
Samsung uses this new exhibit to contend that the date identified as the “Date Modified” –
5
“1/12/2005” – for a file named “tablecloth_27.htm” is the creation date for the “Tablecloth”
6
application discussed in Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (See Dkt. No. 1068-25 and
7
Dkt. No. 1068 at ¶ 28.)
8
This characterization of the 6 kilobyte file is inaccurate and extremely misleading. As
9
discussed in the attached Supplemental Declaration of Ravin Balakrishnan, Ph.D. in Support of
10
Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Supp. Balakrishnan Decl.”),
11
the actual “Tablecloth” application file is named “tablecloth_27.swf”, and bears a “Date
12
Modified” of “6/13/2005”. (See Supp. Balakrishnan Decl. ¶¶ 2-12.) Accordingly, the earliest
13
date Samsung may rely on for a functioning version of the “Tablecloth” application is June 13,
14
2005, which is after the conception date for U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381.
15
16

Dated: June 22, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

17
By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
APPLE INC.’S OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE
CASE NO. 11-CV-1846-LHK

sf-3162599