Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1121
*** EXHIBIT A FILED IN ERROR WITH CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. DOCUMENT LOCKED. *** MOTION for Leave to File Objection To Reply Evidence filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Declaration Of Jason R. Bartlett In Support Of Apples Administrative Motion For Leave To File Objection To Reply Evidence, #3 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/22/2012) Modified on 6/25/2012 (fff, COURT STAFF). Modified text on 6/27/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMIN. MOT. FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION TO REPLY EVID.
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3162719
1
2
Having considered Apple’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File Objection to Reply
Evidence, Apple's motion for leave is GRANTED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: June ____, 2012
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMIN. MOT. FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION TO REPLY EVID.
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3162719
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?