Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1259
MOTION to Shorten Time re Motion to Clarify Portions of the Court's June 30, 2012 Order Denying Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Cashman Declaration, #2 Ex. 1, #3 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/17/2012)
EXHIBIT 1
Adam Cashman
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hung, Richard S. J. [RHung@mofo.com]
Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:23 AM
Adam Cashman
AppleMoFo; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service; Samsung v. Apple
RE: Apple v. Samsung (N.D. Cal.) - Shortened Time on Samsung's Forthcoming Motion to
Clarify
We oppose shortened time.
Richard S.J. Hung
Morrison & Foerster LLP
rhung@mofo.com
(415) 268-7602
From: Adam Cashman [mailto:adamcashman@quinnemanuel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 10:01 AM
To: Hung, Richard S. J.
Cc: AppleMoFo; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service; Samsung v. Apple
Subject: Apple v. Samsung (N.D. Cal.) - Shortened Time on Samsung's Forthcoming Motion to Clarify
Dear Rich:
Samsung intends to move to clarify those portions of the Court’s June 30, 2012 Order Denying Samsung’s Motion for
Summary Judgment that interpreted Judge Grewal’s Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Apple’s Motion to Strike
as applying to prior art references themselves, as opposed to certain opinions proffered by Samsung’s experts that were
based on those prior art references. E.g., Dkt. 1159 at 30, 32, 35. Samsung will file its motion today. Samsung intends to
seek a shortened period of time in which Apple must respond, whereby Apple’s opposition, if any, would be due on July
20. Samsung is prepared to waive its reply brief so that the matter may be heard at the July 24 final pretrial conference.
Please advise by the close of business today whether Apple will oppose Samsung’s request for shortened time.
Regards,
Adam
Adam S. Cashman| Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | 50 California St, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA
94111 Direct: +1.415.875.6384| Main Phone: +1.415.875.6600| Main Fax: +1.415.875.6700| E-mail:
adamcashman@quinnemanuel.com
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and
confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
1
--------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you that, if any
advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including any
attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
For information about this legend, go to
http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or
authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any
information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by
reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?