Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1259

MOTION to Shorten Time re Motion to Clarify Portions of the Court's June 30, 2012 Order Denying Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Cashman Declaration, #2 Ex. 1, #3 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/17/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 1 Adam Cashman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hung, Richard S. J. [RHung@mofo.com] Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:23 AM Adam Cashman AppleMoFo; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service; Samsung v. Apple RE: Apple v. Samsung (N.D. Cal.) - Shortened Time on Samsung's Forthcoming Motion to Clarify We oppose shortened time. Richard S.J. Hung Morrison & Foerster LLP rhung@mofo.com (415) 268-7602 From: Adam Cashman [mailto:adamcashman@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 10:01 AM To: Hung, Richard S. J. Cc: AppleMoFo; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service; Samsung v. Apple Subject: Apple v. Samsung (N.D. Cal.) - Shortened Time on Samsung's Forthcoming Motion to Clarify Dear Rich: Samsung intends to move to clarify those portions of the Court’s June 30, 2012 Order Denying Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment that interpreted Judge Grewal’s Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Apple’s Motion to Strike as applying to prior art references themselves, as opposed to certain opinions proffered by Samsung’s experts that were based on those prior art references. E.g., Dkt. 1159 at 30, 32, 35. Samsung will file its motion today. Samsung intends to seek a shortened period of time in which Apple must respond, whereby Apple’s opposition, if any, would be due on July 20. Samsung is prepared to waive its reply brief so that the matter may be heard at the July 24 final pretrial conference. Please advise by the close of business today whether Apple will oppose Samsung’s request for shortened time. Regards, Adam Adam S. Cashman| Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | 50 California St, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Direct: +1.415.875.6384| Main Phone: +1.415.875.6600| Main Fax: +1.415.875.6700| E-mail: adamcashman@quinnemanuel.com The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you that, if any advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including any attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. For information about this legend, go to http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/ ============================================================================ This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?