Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1259
MOTION to Shorten Time re Motion to Clarify Portions of the Court's June 30, 2012 Order Denying Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Cashman Declaration, #2 Ex. 1, #3 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
13
14
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME
vs.
15 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
16 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
17 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
Defendants.
19
20
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
21 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed a Motion to Clarify
22 Portions of the Court’s June 30, 2012 Order Denying Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
23 Samsung concurrently filed a motion to shorten time pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-3.
24
Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and good cause
25 having been shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Samsung's Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing
26 and Hearing, and sets the hearing for July 24, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.
27 and serve its opposition papers no later than July 20, 2012.
Plaintiff Apple Inc. may file
There shall be no reply.
28
02198.51855/4572231.2
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
-1-
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3 DATED:
_________________, 2012
4
5
6
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4572231.2
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?