Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1356
Unredacted Opening Memroandum Regarding Claim Construction by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company) re 1256 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, re (Dkt. Nos. 1090, 1091) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 4 to the Cashman Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 14 to the Cashman Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 15 to the Cashman Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 17 to the Cashman Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 18 to the Cashman Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 20 to the Cashman Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 63 to the Cashman Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 64 to the Cashman Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 65 to the Cashman Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 66 to the Cashman Declaration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/26/2012) Modified text on 7/27/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
EXHIBIT 17
FILED UNDER SEAL
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
APPLE INC., a California
corporation,
5
6
Plaintiff,
7
vs.
8
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
a Korean business entity;
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., a New York corporation;
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company,
9
10
11
12
Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
Defendants.
---------------------------------/
13
14
15
16
17
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
18
19
20
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DANIELE De IULIIS
Redwood Shores, California
Friday, October 21, 2011
21
22
23
Reported by:
LORRIE L. MARCHANT, CSR No. 10523, RPR, CRR, CCRR,CLR
JOB NO. 43000
24
25
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 2
1
2
Friday, October 21, 2011
10:13 a.m.
3
4
Videotaped Deposition of DANIELE De
5
IULIIS, held at the offices of Quinn
6
Emanuel Urqhart & Sullivan, LLP, 555
7
Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560, Redwood
8
Shores, California, before Lorrie L.
9
Marchant, a Certified Shorthand
10
Reporter, Registered Professional
11
Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter,
12
California Certified Realtime Reporter
13
and Certified LiveNote Reporter.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
A P P E A R A N C E S:
FOR THE PLAINTIFF APPLE INC.:
MORRISON & FOERSTER
BY: ANDREW E. MONACH, ESQ.
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Phone: (415) 268-7588
Fax: (415) 268-7522
e-mail: amonach@mofo.com
FOR THE DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG:
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN
BY: MARGRET CARUSO, ESQ.
SCOTT HALL, ESQ.
555 Twin Dolphin Drive
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Phone: (650) 801-5000
Fax: (650) 801-5100
e-mail: margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com
scotthall@quinnemanuel.com
ALSO PRESENT:
14
Lisa Olle, Apple Senior Corporate Counsel, Litigation
15
Jason Kocol, Videographer
16
---oOo---
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 4
1
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
This is the start of
2
tape labeled No. 1 of the videotaped deposition of
3
Daniele de Iuliis in the matter Apple, Incorporated
4
versus Samsung Electronics Company, Limited, in the
5
United States District Court, Northern District of
6
California, San Jose Division.
7
11-CV-01846-LHK.
8
9
Case No.
This deposition is being held at 555 Twin
Dolphin Drive, Redwood Shores, California, on
10
October 21st, 2011, at approximately 10:13 a.m.
11
name is Jason Kocol.
12
from TSG Reporting, Incorporated, headquartered at
13
747 Third Avenue, New York, New York.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
My
I'm the legal video specialist
The court reporter is Lorrie Marchant in
association with TSG Reporting.
Will counsel please introduce yourselves
for the record.
MS. CARUSO:
Margret Caruso from Quinn,
Emanuel, Urquhart, Sullivan for defendant Samsung.
MR. MONACH:
Andrew Monach, Morrison &
Foerster, representing Apple and the witness.
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
Will the court reporter
please swear in the witness.
THE REPORTER:
Do you solemnly swear or
affirm under the penalties of perjury that the
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 5
1
testimony you are about to offer will be the truth,
2
the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
3
THE WITNESS:
4
I do.
EXAMINATION BY MS. CARUSO
5
BY MS. CARUSO:
6
Q.
Good morning.
7
A.
Good morning.
8
Q.
Have you ever been deposed before?
9
A.
I have not.
10
Q.
Okay.
If at any point during the
11
deposition you would like some more water or would
12
like to take a break, just let me know.
13
accommodate that.
We can
14
A.
Okay.
15
Q.
I just ask that you finish answering
16
whatever question I asked at the time.
17
A.
Thank you.
18
Q.
Let's just step back a little bit.
There's
19
going to be a lot of memory lane for you.
20
could tell me a little bit about your education
21
since graduating from high school.
22
A.
If you
I graduated from Central School of Art and
23
Design in London in 1983 with a BA in industrial
24
design engineering.
25
then.
I've been a professional since
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 184
1
2
THE WITNESS:
button.
3
BY MS. CARUSO:
4
5
This, I believe, is the power
Q.
Is the power button on the iPod touch a
continuous form at its top?
6
MR. MONACH:
7
THE WITNESS:
8
Vague.
Help me understand that
question.
9
BY MS. CARUSO:
10
11
Objection.
Q.
So in Figure 7, the figure that is shown in
C --
12
A.
Yes.
13
Q.
-- has a broken lozenge shape.
14
that?
15
16
Do you see
MR. MONACH:
Object to the form of the
question.
17
THE WITNESS:
I see a lozenge, and it's
18
badly photocopied and -- or what appears to be a
19
lozenge, and that is broken in a couple of places.
20
21
22
23
24
25
BY MS. CARUSO:
Q.
Do you have any understanding of why it's
broken in a couple of places?
A.
I don't understand why it would be broken
in a couple of places.
Q.
You're not aware of any feature of the iPod
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 185
1
touch that would require depicting this button in
2
this fashion?
3
MR. MONACH:
Objection to the extent it
4
lacks foundation.
5
for a legal conclusion.
6
Calls for speculation or calls
THE WITNESS:
These drawings are drawings
7
made by a patent attorney.
8
why they would be drawn in this manner.
9
I don't know the reasons
BY MS. CARUSO:
10
Q.
I'm going to hand you something that I
11
think that you've seen before.
12
up for the camera so there's an image of it
13
recorded.
14
15
16
17
18
19
If you could hold it
Do you have an understanding of what this
is?
A.
This is what I believe to be an early
prototype of a tablet we were developing.
Q.
When you say "we," do you mean the
industrial design group of Apple?
20
A.
I mean Apple.
21
Q.
When was Apple working on developing this
22
23
tablet?
A.
To the best of my knowledge -- it was
24
definitely before the iPhone development, and to the
25
best of my knowledge, around 2003.
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 186
1
Q.
Did you work on the design of this tablet?
2
A.
I worked alongside my colleagues in the
3
industrial design department as a collective and as
4
a team on this.
5
6
7
8
Q.
Approximately how many months did you spend
working on this design?
A.
We spent -- I really don't recall.
It's
going back a long time.
9
Q.
More than three months?
10
A.
Yes.
11
12
13
I'm guessing.
My best guess would be
yes, more than three months.
Q.
Did you create any sketches relating to the
development of this tablet design?
14
A.
I may have.
15
Q.
Is it common that you work on a design for
16
more than three months and don't create a single
17
sketch related to it?
18
MR. MONACH:
19
Objection.
THE WITNESS:
Vague.
I believe I mentioned to you
20
earlier that we tend to go into three dimensions
21
very, very quickly.
22
23
That's generally how we work.
BY MS. CARUSO:
Q.
Is it common that you work on a design for
24
more than three months and don't create a single
25
sketch related to it?
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 187
1
MR. MONACH:
2
THE WITNESS:
3
BY MS. CARUSO:
4
5
Q.
Objection.
Vague.
It's possible.
Is it your understanding that you didn't
create any sketches relating to tablet design?
6
A.
I don't remember.
7
Q.
Have you gone back to look through your
8
sketchbooks from the 2003 time period to see if
9
there were any sketches relating to the tablet
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
design?
A.
I don't remember the dates that were asked
for us to look at.
Q.
So I don't remember the dates.
You referred to this -- did you call it an
early prototype of the tablet design?
A.
I don't remember if I called it an early
prototype or a prototype.
17
Q.
Do you agree that it's an early prototype?
18
A.
I agree that it's a prototype.
19
20
prototype by definition is -- anyway.
Q.
I guess a
I'm sorry.
You've been handed what has been marked as
21
Exhibit 8, Lutton Exhibit 8.
22
Do you have that in
front of you?
23
A.
Yes.
24
Q.
Do you -- and that is US Design Patent
25
504889 --
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 188
1
A.
Yes.
2
Q.
-- correct?
3
4
You're named as an inventor of this design;
is that correct?
5
A.
Yes.
6
Q.
Did you participate in the team that
7
created this design?
8
A.
I did.
9
Q.
Does this D889 reflect the design of the
10
prototype that's in front of you?
11
MR. MONACH:
12
foundation.
13
Vague.
Objection.
Lack of
Objection, calls for a legal
conclusion.
14
THE WITNESS:
15
I believe so.
BY MS. CARUSO:
16
Q.
Do you see Figure 6 of the D889 patent?
17
A.
I do.
18
Q.
There's a circular element on that.
19
Do you
see it?
20
A.
I do.
21
Q.
Do you also see that on the prototype that
22
you're holding?
23
A.
I do.
24
Q.
In Figure 1 of the D889 patent, there's
25
a -- a line that's thicker than the other lines.
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
Do
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 189
1
you see that?
2
MR. MONACH:
Objection.
Vague.
Objection
3
to the extent it may not accurately reflect the
4
drawing.
5
THE WITNESS:
6
BY MS. CARUSO:
7
Q.
I see a bad photocopy.
Starting at the left, do you see three
8
parallel lines on the left-hand side of the top
9
drawing?
10
A.
I do.
11
Q.
Do you see the middle line of those three?
12
A.
I do.
13
Q.
Does it appear to you to be thicker than
14
the other two?
15
A.
Yes.
16
Q.
Do you have an understanding of why it's
17
thicker?
18
MR. MONACH:
19
foundation.
20
Objection.
Lack of
Objection to the extent it calls for a
legal conclusion.
21
THE WITNESS:
22
BY MS. CARUSO:
23
24
25
Q.
I don't.
Do you have any understanding of what that
middle line represents?
MR. MONACH:
Same objection.
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 191
1
MR. MONACH:
2
THE WITNESS:
3
6
Vague.
I don't understand if I
understand your definition.
4
5
Objection.
BY MS. CARUSO:
Q.
Did the gap -- why was there a gap?
I'll
ask that question.
7
A.
I really don't remember.
8
Q.
If you'd look at this --
9
A.
Thank you.
10
Q.
-- and if you could just hold that up again
11
for the camera.
12
13
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
the front.
I didn't get a shot of
You have to hold it longer for me.
14
Thank you.
Great.
15
BY MS. CARUSO:
16
Q.
Does that prototype also have a gap?
17
A.
It does.
18
Q.
And is there anything sort of in the
19
interior of that gap that you can see?
20
MR. MONACH:
21
Objection.
THE WITNESS:
Vague.
22
you're calling the gap.
23
I see a detail within what
BY MS. CARUSO:
24
25
Q.
Is that detail found in the first prototype
you were looking at, as well?
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 192
1
A.
They appear to be similar.
2
Q.
Do you recall any discussions about that
3
detail?
4
A.
Having seen it now for the first time in
5
many years, I remember working as a team on this
6
detail.
7
8
Q.
Do you remember any discussion about the
detail?
9
A.
I don't.
10
Q.
Do you remember any reason why it added
11
esthetically to the product?
12
MR. MONACH:
13
THE WITNESS:
14
Vague.
Probably had a very good
reason at the time.
15
BY MS. CARUSO:
16
17
Objection.
Q.
But you can't recall right now what that
was?
18
A.
I can't recall.
19
Q.
And I asked you about any esthetic reason
20
for putting it there.
Do you remember any other
21
reason for having that detail?
22
A.
I don't recall.
23
Q.
Is it your understanding that Figure 1
24
25
reflects that detail?
MR. MONACH:
Object to the form of the
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 193
1
question to the extent it calls for a legal
2
conclusion.
3
4
But you can review that figure and give
your understanding.
5
6
THE WITNESS:
the gap that's shown here.
7
8
9
I believe that line reflects
BY MS. CARUSO:
Q.
I take it that as with the other design
patents we discussed, you can't call out any
10
particular contribution made by any member of the
11
design team with respect to the design of the D889
12
patent; is that correct?
13
A.
That's correct.
14
Q.
Would you describe the surface of this
15
prototype as contiguous from end to end?
16
17
MR. MONACH:
Object to the form of the
question as vague.
18
THE WITNESS:
19
glass here as being contiguous.
20
BY MS. CARUSO:
21
22
Q.
I would describe the piece of
Would you describe the glass surface as
extending to the outside of the product?
23
MR. MONACH:
Objection.
24
THE WITNESS:
25
Vague.
I would categorize it that way.
I don't know if I'd say -- if
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 194
1
BY MS. CARUSO:
2
Q.
Why not?
3
A.
Well, you said to the outside of the
4
product.
5
Q.
M-hm.
6
A.
And the glass stops.
7
8
9
It doesn't go to the
outside of the product.
Q.
Would you describe the surface of the
iPhone as extending to the outside of the product?
10
MR. MONACH:
11
BY MS. CARUSO:
12
Q.
13
14
15
16
Vague.
I'll reask the question.
Would you describe the glass surface of the
iPhone as extending to the outside of the product?
A.
I would describe the glass surface
extending to the bezel.
17
18
Objection.
MS. CARUSO:
We need to take a short break
to change the tape.
19
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
This marks the end of
20
Tape No. 3 in today's deposition of Daniele de
21
Iuliis.
22
record.
The time is 5:29 p.m.
We are off the
23
(Recess taken, from 5:29 to 5:38.)
24
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
25
This marks the beginning
of Tape No. 4 in today's deposition of Daniele de
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
CONFTDENTTAL ATTORNEYS' EYES
ONLY
Page 196
l_
MS. CARUSO: No further questions'
2
MR. MONACH:
3
6
'7
I
9
10
MS. CARUSO: Thank You.
This marks the end of
Tape No. 4 of 4 and concludes t,oday's deposition of
The time is 5:41 p'm' We are
Daniele de Iulíis,
off the record.
(Time Noted: 5:41 P.m.)
---oOo--THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
t1
T2
13
DANIELE DC
IULIIS
L4
1_5
L6
Thank
your sir.
4
5
I have no questions'
Subscribed and shrorn to
beforer me this tL.l. ¿"v
or
Nal?
ytttùlzot f.i
L7
)
18
19
20
2L
22
23
24
25
TSG
Reporting
87'7
-'l02-9580
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?