Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1356

Unredacted Opening Memroandum Regarding Claim Construction by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company) re 1256 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, re (Dkt. Nos. 1090, 1091) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 4 to the Cashman Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 14 to the Cashman Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 15 to the Cashman Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 17 to the Cashman Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 18 to the Cashman Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 20 to the Cashman Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 63 to the Cashman Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 64 to the Cashman Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 65 to the Cashman Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 66 to the Cashman Declaration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/26/2012) Modified text on 7/27/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 17 FILED UNDER SEAL CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 5 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. 8 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 9 10 11 12 Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK Defendants. ---------------------------------/ 13 14 15 16 17 CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 18 19 20 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DANIELE De IULIIS Redwood Shores, California Friday, October 21, 2011 21 22 23 Reported by: LORRIE L. MARCHANT, CSR No. 10523, RPR, CRR, CCRR,CLR JOB NO. 43000 24 25 TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 2 1 2 Friday, October 21, 2011 10:13 a.m. 3 4 Videotaped Deposition of DANIELE De 5 IULIIS, held at the offices of Quinn 6 Emanuel Urqhart & Sullivan, LLP, 555 7 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560, Redwood 8 Shores, California, before Lorrie L. 9 Marchant, a Certified Shorthand 10 Reporter, Registered Professional 11 Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter, 12 California Certified Realtime Reporter 13 and Certified LiveNote Reporter. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A P P E A R A N C E S: FOR THE PLAINTIFF APPLE INC.: MORRISON & FOERSTER BY: ANDREW E. MONACH, ESQ. 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 Phone: (415) 268-7588 Fax: (415) 268-7522 e-mail: amonach@mofo.com FOR THE DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG: QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN BY: MARGRET CARUSO, ESQ. SCOTT HALL, ESQ. 555 Twin Dolphin Drive Redwood Shores, California 94065 Phone: (650) 801-5000 Fax: (650) 801-5100 e-mail: margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com scotthall@quinnemanuel.com ALSO PRESENT: 14 Lisa Olle, Apple Senior Corporate Counsel, Litigation 15 Jason Kocol, Videographer 16 ---oOo--- 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 4 1 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the start of 2 tape labeled No. 1 of the videotaped deposition of 3 Daniele de Iuliis in the matter Apple, Incorporated 4 versus Samsung Electronics Company, Limited, in the 5 United States District Court, Northern District of 6 California, San Jose Division. 7 11-CV-01846-LHK. 8 9 Case No. This deposition is being held at 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood Shores, California, on 10 October 21st, 2011, at approximately 10:13 a.m. 11 name is Jason Kocol. 12 from TSG Reporting, Incorporated, headquartered at 13 747 Third Avenue, New York, New York. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 My I'm the legal video specialist The court reporter is Lorrie Marchant in association with TSG Reporting. Will counsel please introduce yourselves for the record. MS. CARUSO: Margret Caruso from Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart, Sullivan for defendant Samsung. MR. MONACH: Andrew Monach, Morrison & Foerster, representing Apple and the witness. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter please swear in the witness. THE REPORTER: Do you solemnly swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury that the TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 5 1 testimony you are about to offer will be the truth, 2 the whole truth and nothing but the truth? 3 THE WITNESS: 4 I do. EXAMINATION BY MS. CARUSO 5 BY MS. CARUSO: 6 Q. Good morning. 7 A. Good morning. 8 Q. Have you ever been deposed before? 9 A. I have not. 10 Q. Okay. If at any point during the 11 deposition you would like some more water or would 12 like to take a break, just let me know. 13 accommodate that. We can 14 A. Okay. 15 Q. I just ask that you finish answering 16 whatever question I asked at the time. 17 A. Thank you. 18 Q. Let's just step back a little bit. There's 19 going to be a lot of memory lane for you. 20 could tell me a little bit about your education 21 since graduating from high school. 22 A. If you I graduated from Central School of Art and 23 Design in London in 1983 with a BA in industrial 24 design engineering. 25 then. I've been a professional since TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 184 1 2 THE WITNESS: button. 3 BY MS. CARUSO: 4 5 This, I believe, is the power Q. Is the power button on the iPod touch a continuous form at its top? 6 MR. MONACH: 7 THE WITNESS: 8 Vague. Help me understand that question. 9 BY MS. CARUSO: 10 11 Objection. Q. So in Figure 7, the figure that is shown in C -- 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. -- has a broken lozenge shape. 14 that? 15 16 Do you see MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the question. 17 THE WITNESS: I see a lozenge, and it's 18 badly photocopied and -- or what appears to be a 19 lozenge, and that is broken in a couple of places. 20 21 22 23 24 25 BY MS. CARUSO: Q. Do you have any understanding of why it's broken in a couple of places? A. I don't understand why it would be broken in a couple of places. Q. You're not aware of any feature of the iPod TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 185 1 touch that would require depicting this button in 2 this fashion? 3 MR. MONACH: Objection to the extent it 4 lacks foundation. 5 for a legal conclusion. 6 Calls for speculation or calls THE WITNESS: These drawings are drawings 7 made by a patent attorney. 8 why they would be drawn in this manner. 9 I don't know the reasons BY MS. CARUSO: 10 Q. I'm going to hand you something that I 11 think that you've seen before. 12 up for the camera so there's an image of it 13 recorded. 14 15 16 17 18 19 If you could hold it Do you have an understanding of what this is? A. This is what I believe to be an early prototype of a tablet we were developing. Q. When you say "we," do you mean the industrial design group of Apple? 20 A. I mean Apple. 21 Q. When was Apple working on developing this 22 23 tablet? A. To the best of my knowledge -- it was 24 definitely before the iPhone development, and to the 25 best of my knowledge, around 2003. TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 186 1 Q. Did you work on the design of this tablet? 2 A. I worked alongside my colleagues in the 3 industrial design department as a collective and as 4 a team on this. 5 6 7 8 Q. Approximately how many months did you spend working on this design? A. We spent -- I really don't recall. It's going back a long time. 9 Q. More than three months? 10 A. Yes. 11 12 13 I'm guessing. My best guess would be yes, more than three months. Q. Did you create any sketches relating to the development of this tablet design? 14 A. I may have. 15 Q. Is it common that you work on a design for 16 more than three months and don't create a single 17 sketch related to it? 18 MR. MONACH: 19 Objection. THE WITNESS: Vague. I believe I mentioned to you 20 earlier that we tend to go into three dimensions 21 very, very quickly. 22 23 That's generally how we work. BY MS. CARUSO: Q. Is it common that you work on a design for 24 more than three months and don't create a single 25 sketch related to it? TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 187 1 MR. MONACH: 2 THE WITNESS: 3 BY MS. CARUSO: 4 5 Q. Objection. Vague. It's possible. Is it your understanding that you didn't create any sketches relating to tablet design? 6 A. I don't remember. 7 Q. Have you gone back to look through your 8 sketchbooks from the 2003 time period to see if 9 there were any sketches relating to the tablet 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 design? A. I don't remember the dates that were asked for us to look at. Q. So I don't remember the dates. You referred to this -- did you call it an early prototype of the tablet design? A. I don't remember if I called it an early prototype or a prototype. 17 Q. Do you agree that it's an early prototype? 18 A. I agree that it's a prototype. 19 20 prototype by definition is -- anyway. Q. I guess a I'm sorry. You've been handed what has been marked as 21 Exhibit 8, Lutton Exhibit 8. 22 Do you have that in front of you? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. Do you -- and that is US Design Patent 25 504889 -- TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 188 1 A. Yes. 2 Q. -- correct? 3 4 You're named as an inventor of this design; is that correct? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Did you participate in the team that 7 created this design? 8 A. I did. 9 Q. Does this D889 reflect the design of the 10 prototype that's in front of you? 11 MR. MONACH: 12 foundation. 13 Vague. Objection. Lack of Objection, calls for a legal conclusion. 14 THE WITNESS: 15 I believe so. BY MS. CARUSO: 16 Q. Do you see Figure 6 of the D889 patent? 17 A. I do. 18 Q. There's a circular element on that. 19 Do you see it? 20 A. I do. 21 Q. Do you also see that on the prototype that 22 you're holding? 23 A. I do. 24 Q. In Figure 1 of the D889 patent, there's 25 a -- a line that's thicker than the other lines. TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 Do CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 189 1 you see that? 2 MR. MONACH: Objection. Vague. Objection 3 to the extent it may not accurately reflect the 4 drawing. 5 THE WITNESS: 6 BY MS. CARUSO: 7 Q. I see a bad photocopy. Starting at the left, do you see three 8 parallel lines on the left-hand side of the top 9 drawing? 10 A. I do. 11 Q. Do you see the middle line of those three? 12 A. I do. 13 Q. Does it appear to you to be thicker than 14 the other two? 15 A. Yes. 16 Q. Do you have an understanding of why it's 17 thicker? 18 MR. MONACH: 19 foundation. 20 Objection. Lack of Objection to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 21 THE WITNESS: 22 BY MS. CARUSO: 23 24 25 Q. I don't. Do you have any understanding of what that middle line represents? MR. MONACH: Same objection. TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 191 1 MR. MONACH: 2 THE WITNESS: 3 6 Vague. I don't understand if I understand your definition. 4 5 Objection. BY MS. CARUSO: Q. Did the gap -- why was there a gap? I'll ask that question. 7 A. I really don't remember. 8 Q. If you'd look at this -- 9 A. Thank you. 10 Q. -- and if you could just hold that up again 11 for the camera. 12 13 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: the front. I didn't get a shot of You have to hold it longer for me. 14 Thank you. Great. 15 BY MS. CARUSO: 16 Q. Does that prototype also have a gap? 17 A. It does. 18 Q. And is there anything sort of in the 19 interior of that gap that you can see? 20 MR. MONACH: 21 Objection. THE WITNESS: Vague. 22 you're calling the gap. 23 I see a detail within what BY MS. CARUSO: 24 25 Q. Is that detail found in the first prototype you were looking at, as well? TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 192 1 A. They appear to be similar. 2 Q. Do you recall any discussions about that 3 detail? 4 A. Having seen it now for the first time in 5 many years, I remember working as a team on this 6 detail. 7 8 Q. Do you remember any discussion about the detail? 9 A. I don't. 10 Q. Do you remember any reason why it added 11 esthetically to the product? 12 MR. MONACH: 13 THE WITNESS: 14 Vague. Probably had a very good reason at the time. 15 BY MS. CARUSO: 16 17 Objection. Q. But you can't recall right now what that was? 18 A. I can't recall. 19 Q. And I asked you about any esthetic reason 20 for putting it there. Do you remember any other 21 reason for having that detail? 22 A. I don't recall. 23 Q. Is it your understanding that Figure 1 24 25 reflects that detail? MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 193 1 question to the extent it calls for a legal 2 conclusion. 3 4 But you can review that figure and give your understanding. 5 6 THE WITNESS: the gap that's shown here. 7 8 9 I believe that line reflects BY MS. CARUSO: Q. I take it that as with the other design patents we discussed, you can't call out any 10 particular contribution made by any member of the 11 design team with respect to the design of the D889 12 patent; is that correct? 13 A. That's correct. 14 Q. Would you describe the surface of this 15 prototype as contiguous from end to end? 16 17 MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the question as vague. 18 THE WITNESS: 19 glass here as being contiguous. 20 BY MS. CARUSO: 21 22 Q. I would describe the piece of Would you describe the glass surface as extending to the outside of the product? 23 MR. MONACH: Objection. 24 THE WITNESS: 25 Vague. I would categorize it that way. I don't know if I'd say -- if TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 194 1 BY MS. CARUSO: 2 Q. Why not? 3 A. Well, you said to the outside of the 4 product. 5 Q. M-hm. 6 A. And the glass stops. 7 8 9 It doesn't go to the outside of the product. Q. Would you describe the surface of the iPhone as extending to the outside of the product? 10 MR. MONACH: 11 BY MS. CARUSO: 12 Q. 13 14 15 16 Vague. I'll reask the question. Would you describe the glass surface of the iPhone as extending to the outside of the product? A. I would describe the glass surface extending to the bezel. 17 18 Objection. MS. CARUSO: We need to take a short break to change the tape. 19 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This marks the end of 20 Tape No. 3 in today's deposition of Daniele de 21 Iuliis. 22 record. The time is 5:29 p.m. We are off the 23 (Recess taken, from 5:29 to 5:38.) 24 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: 25 This marks the beginning of Tape No. 4 in today's deposition of Daniele de TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFTDENTTAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 196 l_ MS. CARUSO: No further questions' 2 MR. MONACH: 3 6 '7 I 9 10 MS. CARUSO: Thank You. This marks the end of Tape No. 4 of 4 and concludes t,oday's deposition of The time is 5:41 p'm' We are Daniele de Iulíis, off the record. (Time Noted: 5:41 P.m.) ---oOo--THE VIDEOGRAPHER: t1 T2 13 DANIELE DC IULIIS L4 1_5 L6 Thank your sir. 4 5 I have no questions' Subscribed and shrorn to beforer me this tL.l. ¿"v or Nal? ytttùlzot f.i L7 ) 18 19 20 2L 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting 87'7 -'l02-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?