Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1369

Unredacted Declaration of Karl Kramer in Support of Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment re 1256 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, (Dkt. No. 1013) by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 5, # 4 Exhibit 10)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/26/2012) Modified text on 7/27/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Exhibit 3
(Submitted Under Seal)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
13 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
14 AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

18 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

19
20

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK

vs.

21 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
22 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24
Defendants.
25

SAMSUNG’S SUPPLEMENTAL
OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE'S SIXTEENTH SET OF
INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
UNDER THE PROTECTIVE ORDER

26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1 already in the possession of Apple, publicly available, or as readily available to Apple as it is to
2 Samsung.
3

24.

Samsung objects to each interrogatory to the extent that it seeks information before

4 Samsung is required to disclose such information in accordance with any applicable law, such as
5 the Northern District of California Patent Local Rules.
6

25.

Samsung objects to the interrogatories on the grounds and to the extent that they

7 seek legal conclusions or call for expert testimony.

Samsung’s responses should not be

8 construed to provide legal conclusions.
9

Subject to and without waiving the foregoing General Statement and General Objections,

10 Samsung responds as follows:
11
12

INTERROGATORIES

13
14 INTERROGATORY NO. 81:
15

Explain in detail the operation of any monitoring circuitry, integrated circuit, chip,

16 controller, or module used to operate the touch screens (including the display and touch sensor
17 panels) and used to respond to touch events for each Product at Issue, with reference to and
18 identification of specific source code and microcode files and functions.
19
20 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 81:
21

In addition to the General Objections stated above, Samsung objects to this interrogatory

22 as vague and ambiguous. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it seeks
23 to elicit information subject to and protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work24 product doctrine, the joint defense privilege, the common interest doctrine, and/or any other
25 applicable privilege or immunity. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory on the grounds
26 and to the extent that it seeks legal conclusions or calls for expert testimony. Samsung will
27 provide such contentions in accordance with the Court’s Minute Order and Case Management
28 order, dated August 25, 2011.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-5SAMSUNG’S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1

Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, and following a reasonable

2 investigation, Samsung responds as follows:
3
Product at Issue

Touchscreen
IC Vendor

Touchscreen IC
P/N

TSP Module
Vendor

MCS-6024

Touchscreen
IC F/W
Version
N/A

5

Acclaim

MELFAS

6

Captivate

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

Continuum

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

Droid Charge

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

4

7
8

MELFAS

Exhibit 4G

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

Synopex

9

Epic 4G

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

10

Fascinate

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

11

Gem

MELFAS

MCS-6024

N/A

MELFAS

Galaxy Ace

Cypress

TMA340

N/A

Synopex

Galaxy Prevail

Cypress

TMA340

N/A

S-MAC

12
13

Galaxy S (i9000)

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

14

Galaxy S 4G

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

15

Galaxy S II

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

16

Gravity

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

S-MAC

Indulge

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

Digitech

Infuse 4G

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

17
18

Intercept

MELFAS

MCS-6000

N/A

MELFAS

19

Mesmerize

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

20

Nexus S

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

21

Nexus S 4G

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

Replenish

Cypress

TMA340

N/A

S-MAC

Showcase Galaxy S

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

22
23

Sidekick

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

ILJIN

24

Transform

MELFAS

MCS-6000

N/A

MELFAS

25

Vibrant

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

SMD

26

Galaxy Tab 10.1

ATMEL

mXT224

v1.6aa

ILJIN

27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-6SAMSUNG’S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1

Samsung further responds that some of the information requested in this interrogatory is

2 outside Samsung’s possession, custody or control. Pursuant to Rule 33(d), Samsung further
3 responds by citing the following documents from which such information may be determined:
4 ATMEL-SAMSUNG00000001-8302; SAMNDCA00298514-SAMNDCA00298644;
5 SAMNDCA00298645-SAMNDCA00298748; SAMNDCA00298749-SAMNDCA00298801;
6 SAMNDCA00298802-SAMNDCA00299039; SAMNDCA00299040-SAMNDCA00299312;
7 SAMNDCA00299313-SAMNDCA00299344; SAMNDCA00299345-SAMNDCA00299425;
8 SAMNDCA00324077-SAMNDCA00324077; SAMNDCA00324078-SAMNDCA00324082;
9 SAMNDCA00324083-SAMNDCA00324087; SAMNDCA00324088-SAMNDCA00324093;
10 SAMNDCA10280557-SAMNDCA10283952; SAMNDCA10765141-SAMNDCA10765619;
11 SAMNDCA10885838-SAMNDCA10924995. Samsung further refers to the transcripts for the
12 depositions of Heon-Seok Lee, Martin Simmons and Samuel Brunet from which the requested
13 information can be determined.
14
15 DATED: March 16, 2012
16

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

By Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-7SAMSUNG’S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)