Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1369
Unredacted Declaration of Karl Kramer in Support of Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment re 1256 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, (Dkt. No. 1013) by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 5, # 4 Exhibit 10)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/26/2012) Modified text on 7/27/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
Exhibit 4
(Submitted Under Seal)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
12 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
13 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
14 AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
18 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
19
20
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Plaintiff,
vs.
21 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
22 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24
Defendants.
25
SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE'S SIXTEENTH SET OF
INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
UNDER THE PROTECTIVE ORDER
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1 already in the possession of Apple, publicly available, or as readily available to Apple as it is to
2 Samsung.
3
24.
Samsung objects to each interrogatory to the extent that it seeks information before
4 Samsung is required to disclose such information in accordance with any applicable law, such as
5 the Northern District of California Patent Local Rules.
6
25.
Samsung objects to the interrogatories on the grounds and to the extent that they
7 seek legal conclusions or call for expert testimony.
Samsung’s responses should not be
8 construed to provide legal conclusions.
9
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing General Statement and General Objections,
10 Samsung responds as follows:
11
12
INTERROGATORIES
13
14 INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
15
Explain in detail the operation of any monitoring circuitry, integrated circuit, chip,
16 controller, or module used to operate the touch screens (including the display and touch sensor
17 panels) and used to respond to touch events for each Product at Issue, with reference to and
18 identification of specific source code and microcode files and functions.
19
20 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
21
In addition to the General Objections stated above, Samsung objects to this interrogatory
22 as vague and ambiguous. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it seeks
23 to elicit information subject to and protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work24 product doctrine, the joint defense privilege, the common interest doctrine, and/or any other
25 applicable privilege or immunity. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory on the grounds
26 and to the extent that it seeks legal conclusions or calls for expert testimony. Samsung will
27 provide such contentions in accordance with the Court’s Minute Order and Case Management
28 order, dated August 25, 2011.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-5SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1
Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, and following a reasonable
2 investigation, Samsung responds as follows:
3
Product at Issue
5
Acclaim
MELFAS
MCS-6024
Touchscreen
IC F/W
Version
N/A
6
Captivate
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Continuum
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Droid Charge
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
4
7
8
Touchscreen Touchscreen IC
IC Vendor
P/N
TSP Module
Vendor
MELFAS
Exhibit 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
Synopex
9
Epic 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
10
Fascinate
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
11
Gem
MELFAS
MCS-6024
N/A
MELFAS
Galaxy Ace
Cypress
TMA340
N/A
Synopex
Galaxy Prevail
Cypress
TMA340
N/A
S-MAC
12
13
Galaxy S (i9000)
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
14
Galaxy S 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
15
Galaxy S II
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
16
Gravity
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
S-MAC
Indulge
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
Digitech
Infuse 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
17
18
Intercept
MELFAS
MCS-6000
N/A
MELFAS
19
Mesmerize
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
20
Nexus S
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
21
Nexus S 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Replenish
Cypress
TMA340
N/A
S-MAC
Showcase Galaxy S
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
22
23
Sidekick
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
ILJIN
24
Transform
MELFAS
MCS-6000
N/A
MELFAS
25
Vibrant
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
26
Galaxy Tab 10.1
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
ILJIN
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-6SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1
Samsung further responds that some of the information requested in this interrogatory is
2 outside Samsung’s possession, custody or control. Pursuant to Rule 33(d), Samsung further
3 responds by citing the following documents from which such information may be determined:
4 ATMEL-SAMSUNG00000001-8302; SAMNDCA00298514-SAMNDCA00298644;
5 SAMNDCA00298645-SAMNDCA00298748; SAMNDCA00298749-SAMNDCA00298801;
6 SAMNDCA00298802-SAMNDCA00299039; SAMNDCA00299040-SAMNDCA00299312;
7 SAMNDCA00299313-SAMNDCA00299344; SAMNDCA00299345-SAMNDCA00299425;
8 SAMNDCA00324077-SAMNDCA00324077; SAMNDCA00324078-SAMNDCA00324082;
9 SAMNDCA00324083-SAMNDCA00324087; SAMNDCA00324088-SAMNDCA00324093;
10 SAMNDCA10280557-SAMNDCA10283952; SAMNDCA10765141-SAMNDCA10765619;
11 SAMNDCA10885838-SAMNDCA10924995. Samsung further refers to the transcripts for the
12 depositions of Heon-Seok Lee, Martin Simmons and Samuel Brunet from which the requested
13 information can be determined.
14
15 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
16
In addition to the General Objections stated above, Samsung objects to this interrogatory
17 as vague and ambiguous. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it seeks
18 to elicit information subject to and protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work19 product doctrine, the joint defense privilege, the common interest doctrine, and/or any other
20 applicable privilege or immunity. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory on the grounds
21 and to the extent that it seeks legal conclusions or calls for expert testimony. Samsung will
22 provide such contentions in accordance with the Court’s Minute Order and Case Management
23 order, dated August 25, 2011.
24
Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, and following a reasonable
25 investigation, Samsung responds as follows:
26
Product at Issue
Touchscreen Touchscreen IC
IC Vendor
P/N
27
Acclaim
28
MELFAS
MCS-6024
Touchscreen
IC F/W
Version
N/A
TSP Module
Vendor
MELFAS
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-7SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1
Captivate
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
2
Continuum
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Droid Charge
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Exhibit 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
Synopex
Epic 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
5
Fascinate
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
6
Gem
MELFAS
MCS-6024
N/A
MELFAS
7
Galaxy Ace
Cypress
TMA340
N/A
Synopex
Galaxy Prevail
Cypress
TMA340
N/A
S-MAC
Galaxy S (i9000)
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Galaxy S 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Galaxy S II
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
S-MAC
3
4
8
9
10
11 Galaxy S 2 Epic 4G
Touch
12
Galaxy S 2
Skyrocket
13
Gravity
14
Indulge
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
Digitech
15
Infuse 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Intercept
MELFAS
MCS-6000
N/A
MELFAS
16
Mesmerize
17
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Nexus S
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
18
Nexus S 4G
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
19
Replenish
Cypress
TMA340
N/A
S-MAC
20
Showcase Galaxy S
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
Showcase i500
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
21
Sidekick
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
ILJIN
22
Transform
MELFAS
MCS-6000
N/A
MELFAS
23
Vibrant
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
SMD
24
Galaxy Tab
ATMEL
mXT224
v1.6aa
ILJIN
25
Galaxy Tab 10.1
ATMEL
mXT1386
v1.0aa
ILJIN
26
27
28
Samsung further responds that some of the information requested in this interrogatory is
outside Samsung’s possession, custody or control. Pursuant to Rule 33(d), Samsung further
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-8SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1 responds by citing the following documents from which such information may be determined:
2 ATMEL-SAMSUNG00000001-8302; SAMNDCA00298514-SAMNDCA00298644;
3 SAMNDCA00298645-SAMNDCA00298748; SAMNDCA00298749-SAMNDCA00298801;
4 SAMNDCA00298802-SAMNDCA00299039; SAMNDCA00299040-SAMNDCA00299312;
5 SAMNDCA00299313-SAMNDCA00299344; SAMNDCA00299345-SAMNDCA00299425;
6 SAMNDCA00324077-SAMNDCA00324077; SAMNDCA00324078-SAMNDCA00324082;
7 SAMNDCA00324083-SAMNDCA00324087; SAMNDCA00324088-SAMNDCA00324093;
8 SAMNDCA10280557-SAMNDCA10283952; SAMNDCA10765141-SAMNDCA10765619;
9 SAMNDCA10885838-SAMNDCA10924995. Samsung further refers to the transcripts for the
10 depositions of Heon-Seok Lee, Martin Simmons and Samuel Brunet from which the requested
11 information can be determined.
12
13 DATED: March 22, 2012
14
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
By Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-9SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?