Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1445

Declaration of JASON R. BARTLETT in Support of 1444 Apple's Response to Samsung's Objections to Apple's Opening Statement Demonstrative Exhibits, filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Related document(s) 1444 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/29/2012) Modified text on 7/30/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Exhibit 1 Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION APPLE INC., a California § Corporation, § § Plaintiff, § § Vs. § Case No. § 11-CV-01846-LHK § SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., § LTD., a Korean business § entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS § AMERICA, INC., a New York § corporation; SAMSUNG § TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, § LLC, a Delaware limited § liability company, § § Defendants. § 13 14 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL UNDER THE PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 16 17 18 DEPOSITION OF JUSTIN DENISON Dallas, Texas Wednesday, September 21st, 2011 19 20 21 22 Reported by: 23 Daniel J. Skur, Notary Public and CSR 24 JOB NO. 41964 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order Page 4 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 VIDEOGRAPHER: This is tape 1 in the 3 video deposition of Justin Denison. Today 4 is Wednesday, September 21st, 2011. We're 5 now on record at approximately 9:36 a.m. 6 Will the attorneys please introduce 7 themselves for the record. 8 9 MR. HUNG: Richard Hung of Morrison & Foerster on behalf of Apple, Inc. With 10 me today is Diana Kruze, also of Morrison & 11 Foerster and also for Apple. 12 MS. MAROULIS: Victoria Maroulis 13 with Quinn Emanuel, counsel for Samsung, 14 and with me is Mark Tung of Quinn Emanuel, 15 Cindy Moreland of STA, and we have an 16 interpreter, Ann Park. 17 JUSTIN DENISON, 18 having been duly sworn, testified as follows: 19 EXAMINATION 20 BY MR. HUNG: 21 Q. Morning, Mr. Denison. 22 A. Morning. 23 MR. HUNG: Before we get started, I 24 did have a discussion with Ms. Maroulis, 25 and I just wanted to note a couple of TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order Page 33 1 A. Outside of the name that I've 2 already offered, I don't believe that there 3 are -- is anyone else other than Cindy Moreland 4 who is the general counsel of STA and is 5 present today. 6 directly, but the Quinn Emanuel attorney 7 Margaret -- 8 9 I've not referred to her MS. MAROULIS: A. Caruso. -- Caruso, thank you, and Quinn 10 Emanuel attorney Mark Tung, who is seated here 11 today as well. 12 BY MR. HUNG: 13 Q. Did you have a separate meeting with 14 the individuals to whom you just referred apart 15 from the conversations with the individuals 16 listed on Exhibit 225? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. When did that meeting occur? 19 A. I have had several meetings with the 20 Quinn Emanuel attorneys to prepare for this 21 deposition, the first of which occurred last 22 week, and the most recent of which occurred 23 yesterday, not counting this morning. 24 25 Q. discussed. Again, I don't want to know what you I just want to know how long those TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order Page 34 1 meetings were. 2 aggregate? 3 A. How long were those meetings in In aggregate, I would estimate that 4 I spent two to three full days in discussions 5 with the Quinn Emanuel attorneys. 6 Q. Is this separate and apart from the 7 10 to 12 hours that you testified you spent 8 speaking with the individuals listed on Exhibit 9 225? 10 11 MS. MAROULIS: A. Objection, vague. As I understand the question, 12 outside of the teleconference time I spent with 13 the individuals that are on this sheet of 14 paper, yes, the time frame I gave you is 15 approximate. 16 BY MR. HUNG: 17 Q. 18 Dallas? 19 A. Yes. 20 Q. The Dallas area? 21 A. The meetings -- the meetings with Okay. Did those meetings occur in 22 the Quinn Emanuel attorneys occurred in the 23 Dallas area. 24 25 MS. MAROULIS: I think he's talking about Richardson. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order Page 135 1 hypothetical, beyond the scope. 2 BY MR. HUNG: 3 Q. What steps does Samsung take, if 4 any, to ensure that its employees do not copy 5 Apple's designs in developing its Android smart 6 phones? 7 MS. MAROULIS: Objection, beyond the 8 scope to the extent it goes beyond products 9 at issue. 10 A. When conferring with the designers 11 for the products at issue, in all cases I 12 specifically asked them if they had considered 13 or studied or drawn direct comparisons or what 14 have you versus the relevant Apple products, 15 whether it be tablet or smart phone in either 16 case, and in each case the designers said that 17 they had not. 18 Q. Did you ask them whether they had 19 used -- let's focus first on the Infuse 4G. 20 Did you ask the designers on the Infuse 4G 21 whether they had used any Apple product as 22 inspiration for the design of the Infuse 4G? 23 MS. MAROULIS: 24 asked and answered. 25 A. Objection, vague, I specifically asked the engineers TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order Page 341 1 C E R T I F I C A T E 2 STATE OF TEXAS ) ) 3 COUNTY OF DALLAS ) 4 5 I, Daniel J. Skur, a Notary Public 6 within and for the State of Texas, do 7 hereby certify: 8 9 That JUSTIN DENISON, the witness whose deposition is hereinbefore set forth, 10 was duly sworn by me and that such 11 deposition is a true record of the 12 testimony given by such witness. 13 I further certify that I am not 14 related to any of the parties to this 15 action by blood or marriage; and that I am 16 in no way interested in the outcome of this 17 matter. 18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 19 set my hand this 21st day of September, 20 2011. 21 22 ___________________________________ Daniel J. Skur 23 Notary Public, State of Texas. My Commission Expires 7/10/2014 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?