Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1445
Declaration of JASON R. BARTLETT in Support of 1444 Apple's Response to Samsung's Objections to Apple's Opening Statement Demonstrative Exhibits, filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Related document(s) 1444 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/29/2012) Modified text on 7/30/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
Exhibit 1
Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California
§
Corporation,
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
Vs.
§
Case No.
§ 11-CV-01846-LHK
§
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
§
LTD., a Korean business
§
entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS §
AMERICA, INC., a New York
§
corporation; SAMSUNG
§
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, §
LLC, a Delaware limited
§
liability company,
§
§
Defendants.
§
13
14
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
UNDER THE PROTECTIVE ORDER
15
16
17
18
DEPOSITION OF JUSTIN DENISON
Dallas, Texas
Wednesday, September 21st, 2011
19
20
21
22
Reported by:
23
Daniel J. Skur, Notary Public and CSR
24
JOB NO. 41964
25
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order
Page 4
1
P R O C E E D I N G S
2
VIDEOGRAPHER:
This is tape 1 in the
3
video deposition of Justin Denison.
Today
4
is Wednesday, September 21st, 2011.
We're
5
now on record at approximately 9:36 a.m.
6
Will the attorneys please introduce
7
themselves for the record.
8
9
MR. HUNG:
Richard Hung of Morrison
& Foerster on behalf of Apple, Inc.
With
10
me today is Diana Kruze, also of Morrison &
11
Foerster and also for Apple.
12
MS. MAROULIS:
Victoria Maroulis
13
with Quinn Emanuel, counsel for Samsung,
14
and with me is Mark Tung of Quinn Emanuel,
15
Cindy Moreland of STA, and we have an
16
interpreter, Ann Park.
17
JUSTIN DENISON,
18
having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
19
EXAMINATION
20
BY MR. HUNG:
21
Q.
Morning, Mr. Denison.
22
A.
Morning.
23
MR. HUNG:
Before we get started, I
24
did have a discussion with Ms. Maroulis,
25
and I just wanted to note a couple of
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order
Page 33
1
A.
Outside of the name that I've
2
already offered, I don't believe that there
3
are -- is anyone else other than Cindy Moreland
4
who is the general counsel of STA and is
5
present today.
6
directly, but the Quinn Emanuel attorney
7
Margaret --
8
9
I've not referred to her
MS. MAROULIS:
A.
Caruso.
-- Caruso, thank you, and Quinn
10
Emanuel attorney Mark Tung, who is seated here
11
today as well.
12
BY MR. HUNG:
13
Q.
Did you have a separate meeting with
14
the individuals to whom you just referred apart
15
from the conversations with the individuals
16
listed on Exhibit 225?
17
A.
Yes.
18
Q.
When did that meeting occur?
19
A.
I have had several meetings with the
20
Quinn Emanuel attorneys to prepare for this
21
deposition, the first of which occurred last
22
week, and the most recent of which occurred
23
yesterday, not counting this morning.
24
25
Q.
discussed.
Again, I don't want to know what you
I just want to know how long those
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order
Page 34
1
meetings were.
2
aggregate?
3
A.
How long were those meetings in
In aggregate, I would estimate that
4
I spent two to three full days in discussions
5
with the Quinn Emanuel attorneys.
6
Q.
Is this separate and apart from the
7
10 to 12 hours that you testified you spent
8
speaking with the individuals listed on Exhibit
9
225?
10
11
MS. MAROULIS:
A.
Objection, vague.
As I understand the question,
12
outside of the teleconference time I spent with
13
the individuals that are on this sheet of
14
paper, yes, the time frame I gave you is
15
approximate.
16
BY MR. HUNG:
17
Q.
18
Dallas?
19
A.
Yes.
20
Q.
The Dallas area?
21
A.
The meetings -- the meetings with
Okay.
Did those meetings occur in
22
the Quinn Emanuel attorneys occurred in the
23
Dallas area.
24
25
MS. MAROULIS:
I think he's talking
about Richardson.
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order
Page 135
1
hypothetical, beyond the scope.
2
BY MR. HUNG:
3
Q.
What steps does Samsung take, if
4
any, to ensure that its employees do not copy
5
Apple's designs in developing its Android smart
6
phones?
7
MS. MAROULIS:
Objection, beyond the
8
scope to the extent it goes beyond products
9
at issue.
10
A.
When conferring with the designers
11
for the products at issue, in all cases I
12
specifically asked them if they had considered
13
or studied or drawn direct comparisons or what
14
have you versus the relevant Apple products,
15
whether it be tablet or smart phone in either
16
case, and in each case the designers said that
17
they had not.
18
Q.
Did you ask them whether they had
19
used -- let's focus first on the Infuse 4G.
20
Did you ask the designers on the Infuse 4G
21
whether they had used any Apple product as
22
inspiration for the design of the Infuse 4G?
23
MS. MAROULIS:
24
asked and answered.
25
A.
Objection, vague,
I specifically asked the engineers
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order
Page 341
1
C E R T I F I C A T E
2
STATE OF TEXAS
)
)
3
COUNTY OF DALLAS
)
4
5
I, Daniel J. Skur, a Notary Public
6
within and for the State of Texas, do
7
hereby certify:
8
9
That JUSTIN DENISON, the witness
whose deposition is hereinbefore set forth,
10
was duly sworn by me and that such
11
deposition is a true record of the
12
testimony given by such witness.
13
I further certify that I am not
14
related to any of the parties to this
15
action by blood or marriage; and that I am
16
in no way interested in the outcome of this
17
matter.
18
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
19
set my hand this 21st day of September,
20
2011.
21
22
___________________________________
Daniel J. Skur
23
Notary Public, State of Texas.
My Commission Expires 7/10/2014
24
25
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?