Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 146

STIPULATION re #115 Order,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Deadline by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR SAMSUNG’S DISCOVERY OF APPLE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2(a) 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 Trial Date: None Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE 1 By this stipulation, plaintiff, counter-defendant and counter-claimant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) 2 and defendants and counter-claimants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics 3 America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) 4 hereby stipulate and request an order extending the deadline for Samsung’s discovery from Apple, 5 set in the Court’s July 18, 2011 Order Setting Briefing and Hearing Schedule for Preliminary 6 Injunction Motion (Dkt. No. 115), from August 8, 2011 to August 16, 2011. This extension of 7 time will permit Samsung to take the depositions of two witnesses, Bas Ording and Ravin 8 Balakrishnan, whose depositions could not be scheduled at earlier dates. See Declaration of Todd 9 M. Briggs in Support of Order Extending Deadline for Samsung’s Discovery of Apple Pursuant to 10 Civil L.R. 6-2(a), filed concurrently herewith. This extension of time for discovery from Apple 11 applies only to the depositions of Mr. Ording and Dr. Balakrishnan. No other due dates set forth 12 in the Court’s July 18, 2011 Order Setting Briefing and Hearing Schedule for Preliminary 13 Injunction Motion (Dkt. No. 115) are to be changed by this stipulation. 14 15 DATED: August 8, 2011 16 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis Victoria F. Maroulis Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 17 18 19 20 21 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 22 23 24 DATED: August 8, 2011 By /s/ Jason R. Bartlett Jason R. Bartlett Attorney for APPLE INC. 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE 1 I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B that concurrence in the electronic filing of 2 this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 3 DATED: August 8, 2011 4 /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis Victoria F. Maroulis 5 6 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS ORDERED THAT the July 18, 2011 Order 8 Setting Briefing and Hearing Schedule for Preliminary Injunction Motion in this action is 9 amended such that the deadline for Samsung’s discovery from Apple is extended to and including 10 August 16, 2011. This extension of time for discovery from Apple applies only to the depositions 11 of Mr. Ording and Dr. Balakrishnan. 12 13 Dated: August __, 2011 14 ________________________________ Honorable Lucy H. Koh U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?