Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 146

STIPULATION re #115 Order,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Deadline by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/8/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
2
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
4 Facsimile:
[phone]
5 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
6
[e-mail]
Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603)
7
[e-mail]
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
8 Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone:
[phone]
9 Facsimile:
[phone]
10 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)
[e-mail]
11
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
12 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone:
[phone]
13 Facsimile:
[phone]
14 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
15 INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

19
20 APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK

21

DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS
IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR SAMSUNG’S
DISCOVERY OF APPLE PURSUANT TO
CIVIL L.R. 6-2(a)

22

Plaintiff,
vs.

23 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
24 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
25 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
26
Defendant.
27

Trial Date:

None

28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

I, Todd M. Briggs, declare as follows:

2

1.

I am a partner with the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and

3 counsel for defendants and counter-claimants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics
4 America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I
5 submit this declaration in support of the parties’ stipulation and proposed order extending the
6 deadline for Samsung’s discovery from Apple, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2. I am personally
7 familiar with and knowledgeable about the facts stated in this declaration and if called upon could
8 and would testify competently as to the statements made herein.
9

2.

On July 1, 2011, plaintiff, counter-defendant and counter-claimant Apple Inc.

10 (“Apple”) filed a motion for preliminary injunction, seeking in part an order that Apple is entitled
11 to a preliminary injunction based on Samsung’s alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381
12 (“the ‘381 patent”). See Dkt. No. 86.
13

3.

On July 2, 2011, the Court invited the parties to provide input regarding a

14 reasonable time frame for briefing and hearing Apple’s motion, noting that the schedule would
15 need to accommodate time to conduct discovery pertinent to the preliminary injunction motion.
16 See Dkt. No. 95.
17

4.

On July 8, 2011, the parties filed a joint submission regarding the briefing and

18 hearing schedule. See Dkt. No. 100.
19

5.

On July 18, this Court entered an Order Setting Briefing and Hearing Schedule for

20 Preliminary Injunction Motion (see Dkt. No. 115), setting August 8, 2011 as the deadline for
21 Samsung’s discovery from Apple relating to the preliminary injunction motion.
22

6.

Since Apple filed its preliminary injunction motion, the parties have worked to

23 schedule the depositions of witnesses with information to Apple’s motion. Those witnesses
24 include Bas Ording, the sole named inventor of the ‘381 patent which is one of the subjects of
25 Apple’s preliminary injunction motion; and Ravin Balakrishnan, who provided an expert
26 declaration in support of Apple’s preliminary injunction motion. Dkt. No. 91.
27

7.

Despite the parties’ best efforts to schedule the depositions within the deadline set

28 by the Court’s July 18, 2011 Order, counsel for the parties and Mr. Ording are not available for
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 Mr. Ording’s deposition until August 9, 2011, and counsel for the parties and Dr. Balakrishnan are
2 not available until August 16, 2011 for Dr. Balakrishnan’s deposition.
3

8.

The parties have not previously modified the Court’s July 18, 2011 Order setting

4 the briefing and hearing schedule for Apple’s preliminary injunction motion.
5

9.

The requested time modification should not have any effect on the remainder of the

6 schedule for this case.
7

I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the

8 foregoing is true and correct.
9
10 DATED: August 8, 2011
11
12
13
14
15
16

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

By /s/ Todd M. Briggs
Todd M. Briggs
Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-3DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER