Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1573
MOTION for Leave to File Reply to 1556 Reuters America LLC's Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence filed by Qualcomm Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David A. Kays, # 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of David A. Kays, # 3 Proposed Order, # 4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Kays, David) (Filed on 8/3/2012) Modified on 8/6/2012 linking entry to document #1556 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DAVID KAYS, ESQ. (SBN 120798)
FREEDA LUGO, ESQ. (SBN 244913 )
MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH
99 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1000
San Jose, California 95113-1613
Telephone: (408) 288-8288
Facsimile: (408) 288-8325
ROGER G. BROOKS, Pro Hac Vice
CRAVATH, SWAIN & MOORE LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10019-7475
Telephone: (212) 474-1000
Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
Attorneys for Non-Party,
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
APPLE INC., a California corporation,,
Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
15
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
19
20
21
NON-PARTY QUALCOMM
INCORPORATED’S MOTION FOR
vs.
LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO
REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, EVIDENCE
a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
22
23
Non-Party Qualcomm Incorporated respectfully requests leave to file a reply to
24
address the erroneous argument in Reuters America LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal
25
Trial and Pretrial Evidence that Qualcomm’s administrative motion to seal is moot. As set
26
forth in Qualcomm’s reply, attached as Exhibit A to the declaration of David A. Kays
27
filed herewith, despite the inadvertent disclosure of the licensing terms that were the
28
subject of Qualcomm’s administrative motion to seal – which Qualcomm has addressed –
1
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics, Case No: 11-CV-01846-LHK
QUALCOMM'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO
REUTERS OPPO TO MOT. TO SEAL TRAIL/PRE\-TRIAL EVIDENCE
1
sealing Qualcomm’s confidential information in this Court’s record still matters in the real
2
world.
3
In light of this erroneous argument directed at Qualcomm’s administrative motion to
4
seal, Qualcomm respectfully requests leave to file a short reply to address this argument, a
5
copy of which is attached as Exhibit A to the declaration of David A. Kays filed
6
concurrently herewith.
7
8
9
Dated: August 3, 2012
10
MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE, LLP
11
By:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics, Case No: 11-CV-01846-LHK
QUALCOMM'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO
REUTERS OPPO TO MOT. TO SEAL TRAIL/PRE\-TRIAL EVIDENCE
/S/
DAVID KAYS
Attorneys for Non-Party
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?