Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1573

MOTION for Leave to File Reply to 1556 Reuters America LLC's Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence filed by Qualcomm Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David A. Kays, # 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of David A. Kays, # 3 Proposed Order, # 4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Kays, David) (Filed on 8/3/2012) Modified on 8/6/2012 linking entry to document #1556 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DAVID KAYS, ESQ. (SBN 120798) FREEDA LUGO, ESQ. (SBN 244913 ) MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH 99 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1000 San Jose, California 95113-1613 Telephone: (408) 288-8288 Facsimile: (408) 288-8325 ROGER G. BROOKS, Pro Hac Vice CRAVATH, SWAIN & MOORE LLP Worldwide Plaza 825 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10019-7475 Telephone: (212) 474-1000 Facsimile: (212) 474-3700 Attorneys for Non-Party, QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 APPLE INC., a California corporation,, Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 15 Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 19 20 21 DECLARATION OF DAVID A. KAYS IN SUPPORT OF NONvs. PARTY QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S MOTION FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL a Delaware limited liability company, EVIDENCE Defendants. 22 23 24 25 I, David A. Kays, hereby declare: 1. I am an attorney with the law firm of Morgan Franich Fredkin & Marsh, counsel for 26 Non-Party Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”). I make this declaration in 27 connection with Qualcomm’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Reuters America 28 1 Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics, Case No: 11-CV-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF DAVID A. KAYS IN SUPPORT OF QUALCOMM'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO REUTERS OPPO TO MOT. TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL EVIDENCE 1 LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence. I have personal 2 knowledge of the matters set forth herein and if called as a witness could 3 competently testify thereto. 4 2. Attached as Exhibit A is Non-Party Qualcomm Incorporated’s Reply to Third Party 5 Reuters America LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence. 6 7 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 8 foregoing is true and correct. 9 California. Executed this 3rd day of August 2012, at San Jose, 10 11 /S/ 12 DAVID KAYS 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics, Case No: 11-CV-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF DAVID A. KAYS IN SUPPORT OF QUALCOMM'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO REUTERS OPPO TO MOT. TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL EVIDENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?