Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1594
MOTION for Leave to File REPLY TO 1556 REUTERS AMERICA LLC'S OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL EVIDENCE filed by Motorola Mobility LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Proposed Order, # 4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Golinveaux, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/6/2012) Modified on 8/7/2012 linking entry to document #1556 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
APPLE, INC., a California Corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a )
Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
NON-PARTY MOTOROLA
MOBILITY LLC’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO
REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO
SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL
EVIDENCE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
SF:337975.1
1
Non-Party Motorola Mobility LLC filed a Motion For Leave to File Reply to Reuters
2
America LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence. The proposed Reply
3
was attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux filed with the motion.
4
5
6
7
Having considered the motion, and all other relevant papers concerning that motion, it is
hereby ORDERED that:
Non-Party Motorola Mobility LLC’s Motion For Leave to File Reply to Reuters America
LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence is GRANTED.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: _____________________
12
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
SF:337975.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?