Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1594

MOTION for Leave to File REPLY TO 1556 REUTERS AMERICA LLC'S OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL EVIDENCE filed by Motorola Mobility LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Proposed Order, # 4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Golinveaux, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/6/2012) Modified on 8/7/2012 linking entry to document #1556 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 APPLE, INC., a California Corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) corporation; SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a ) Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 11-CV-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTY MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL EVIDENCE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK SF:337975.1 1 Non-Party Motorola Mobility LLC filed a Motion For Leave to File Reply to Reuters 2 America LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence. The proposed Reply 3 was attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux filed with the motion. 4 5 6 7 Having considered the motion, and all other relevant papers concerning that motion, it is hereby ORDERED that: Non-Party Motorola Mobility LLC’s Motion For Leave to File Reply to Reuters America LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence is GRANTED. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: _____________________ 12 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK SF:337975.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?