Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 501

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to file under seal, #2 Declaration of Melissa Chan In Support of Admin Motion, #3 Declaration In Support of Samsung's Opposition, #4 Exhibit 1 to Chan Declaration, #5 Exhibit 2 to Chan Declaration, #6 Exhibit 3 to Chan Declaration, #7 Exhibit 4 to Chan Declaration, #8 Exhibit 5 to Chan Declaration, #9 Exhibit 6 to Chan Declaration, #10 Exhibit 7 to Chan Declaration, #11 Exhibit 8 to Chan Declaration, #12 Exhibit 9 to Chan Declaration, #13 Declaration 10 to Chan Declaration, #14 Exhibit 11 to Chan Declaration, #15 Exhibit 3 to Jenkins Declaration, #16 Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel, #17 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Compel, #18 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/15/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND
THINGS
Date: December 16, 2011
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 5, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Paul S. Grewal

Defendants.

19
20
21
22

On December 8, 2011, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) moved for an order compelling

23 Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
24 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce documents and things
25 responsive to various of Apple’s Requests for Production.
26

Having considered the briefs and the arguments of the parties, and the entire file in this

27 action, the Court hereby DENIES Apple’s motion to compel in its entirety.
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3 DATED: ___________, 2011
4
5
6

The Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL