Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 501

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order to file under seal, # 2 Declaration of Melissa Chan In Support of Admin Motion, # 3 Declaration In Support of Samsung's Opposition, # 4 Exhibit 1 to Chan Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 2 to Chan Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 3 to Chan Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 4 to Chan Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 5 to Chan Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 6 to Chan Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 7 to Chan Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 8 to Chan Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 9 to Chan Declaration, # 13 Declaration 10 to Chan Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 11 to Chan Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 3 to Jenkins Declaration, # 16 Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel, # 17 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Compel, # 18 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS Date: December 16, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 5, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Paul S. Grewal Defendants. 19 20 21 22 On December 8, 2011, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) moved for an order compelling 23 Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung 24 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce documents and things 25 responsive to various of Apple’s Requests for Production. 26 Having considered the briefs and the arguments of the parties, and the entire file in this 27 action, the Court hereby DENIES Apple’s motion to compel in its entirety. 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 DATED: ___________, 2011 4 5 6 The Honorable Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?