Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
501
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to file under seal, #2 Declaration of Melissa Chan In Support of Admin Motion, #3 Declaration In Support of Samsung's Opposition, #4 Exhibit 1 to Chan Declaration, #5 Exhibit 2 to Chan Declaration, #6 Exhibit 3 to Chan Declaration, #7 Exhibit 4 to Chan Declaration, #8 Exhibit 5 to Chan Declaration, #9 Exhibit 6 to Chan Declaration, #10 Exhibit 7 to Chan Declaration, #11 Exhibit 8 to Chan Declaration, #12 Exhibit 9 to Chan Declaration, #13 Declaration 10 to Chan Declaration, #14 Exhibit 11 to Chan Declaration, #15 Exhibit 3 to Jenkins Declaration, #16 Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel, #17 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Compel, #18 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/15/2011)
EXHIBIT 4
Melissa Chan
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Melissa Chan
Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:54 AM
'Mazza, Mia'; Diane Hutnyan
Samsung v. Apple; 'AppleMoFo'; 'sam.maselli@wilmerhale.com';
'calvin.walden@wilmerhale.com'; 'peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com'
RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Stipulation to Proceed on Shortened
Time
Dear Mia,
As we have stated before, Samsung is agreeable to producing the categories of documents set forth below, subject to
Samsung’s objections as discussed in its written responses and during prior meet and confer calls, thus obviating any
need for motion practice. Due to technical constraints, logistical and translation issues, limited availability issues due to
the upcoming holiday season, and the sheer volume of materials being demanded by Apple for expedited production,
we have inserted more feasible dates into the list in your email below, as follows:
• Samsung will make a good‐faith, expedited effort to locate and substantially complete, by December 31, 2011,
its production of “Apple” and survey documents,
• Samsung will make a good‐faith, expedited effort to locate and substantially complete, by December 31, 2011,
its production of certain categories of source code as described in your December 6, 2011 letter;
• Samsung will make a good‐faith, expedited effort to locate and substantially complete, by January 6, 2012, its
production of sketchbooks and physical models for Galaxy phone and tablet products; and
• Samsung will make a good‐faith, expedited effort to locate and substantially complete, by January 6, 2012, its
production of CAD files created in connection with the design of Galaxy phone and tablet products.
To avoid the need for any motion practice on these same issues by Samsung against Apple, please confirm by the close
of business today that Apple will make the same good‐faith effort to produce these same categories of documents (as
requested by Samsung) by the dates listed above.
Thanks,
Melissa
From: Mazza, Mia [mailto:MMazza@mofo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:31 PM
To: Diane Hutnyan
Cc: Samsung v. Apple; AppleMoFo; sam.maselli@wilmerhale.com; calvin.walden@wilmerhale.com;
peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com
Subject: FW: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Stipulation to Proceed on Shortened Time
Diane -As we discussed on today's call and in previous correspondence, please also let me know whether -- if motion practice
does proceed -- Samsung agrees to the motion being heard on shortened time, as follows:
Opening brief: Thursday, December 8, 2011
Opposition brief: Monday, December 12, 2011
1
Reply brief: Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Hearing: on or about Friday, December 16, 2011
As we've discussed, Judge Grewal's calendar reflects that he is unavailable for hearing during the week of December 19,
2011.
Regards,
Mia Mazza
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
(415) 268-6024 office
(415) 302-6583 mobile
(415) 268-7522 fax
______________________________________________
From: Mazza, Mia
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 8:23 PM
To:
'dianehutnyan@quinnemanuel.com'
Cc:
'samsungv.apple@quinnemanuel.com'; AppleMoFo; 'sam.maselli@wilmerhale.com'; 'calvin.walden@wilmerhale.com'; 'peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com'
Subject:
Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Written Confirmation Needed to Avoid Motion Practice
<<2011-12-07 Ltr Mazza to Hutnyan re MTC.pdf>>
Hi Diane,
Attached please find discovery correspondence regarding the written commitment Samsung will need to make by noon
Pacific tomorrow (December 8, 2011) to avoid motion practice at this time.
I have attached the referenced correspondence as well.
Regards,
Mia Mazza
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
(415) 268-6024 office
(415) 302-6583 mobile
(415) 268-7522 fax
<<2011-12-06 Ltr Mazza to Chan re Source Code.pdf>> <<2011-12-06 Ltr Mazza to Ducca re Expedited Design
Production.pdf>> <<2011-12-05 Ltr Mazza to Kassabian re M&C and MTC.pdf>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you that, if any
advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including any
attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
2
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
For information about this legend, go to
http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or
authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any
information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by
reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?