Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
530
MOTION for Reconsideration re #510 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Hankil Kang, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/21/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF HANKIL KANG IN
SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendant.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF HANKIL KANG
1
I, Hankil Kang, do hereby declare as follows:
1.
I am Legal Counsel at Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. I submit this Declaration in
support of Samsung’s Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for
Reconsideration. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if called
as a witness, could and would competently testify to them.
2.
Exhibit E of the Chung Declaration is a study conducted by Samsung in early 2011
entitled “Premium & Mass Design Preference Study: Design Planning & Strategy.” This
document reveals the methodology Samsung uses in conducting qualitative consumer research in
its efforts to elicit and understand consumer perceptions and preferences. This document further
reveals how Samsung classifies and evaluates different segments of the smartphone market.
3.
In addition to revealing Samsung’s consumer research methodology, Exhibit E
discusses the study’s competitive analysis of design preferences relating to size, shape, color, and
configuration of smartphone keypads. Samsung invested significant resources in conducting this
consumer and competitive research, which will now accrue to the benefit of Samsung’s
competitors unless this document is filed under seal.
4.
Exhibit E depicts unreleased prototypes of Samsung products that have never been
disclosed to the public, referencing them according to confidential internal product designators.
Samsung has not permanently discarded these designs and may seek to exploit them in the future.
The value of these prototypes and the designs they embody will be lost if they are made available
to the public.
5.
Exhibit E contains commercially sensitive business information, including
confidential information from the files of Samsung’s designers relating to the design of Samsung’s
products and confidential information regarding product evaluation techniques. Samsung takes
significant steps to strictly maintain the confidentiality of this information, which is only shared
with employees who work on such issues as part of their regular job duties. Samsung protects this
information as a trade secret, and for that reason produced this document and similar documents
with the designation HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under the interim
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF HANKIL KANG
1 protective order. This information could be used to Samsung’s disadvantage if it were not filed
2 under seal.
3
6.
Apple’s Motion to Augment Record summarizes, describes and/or directly cites to
4 the confidential Chung Declaration and Samsung’s confidential information, including the
5 information contained in Exhibit E, discussed in paragraphs 2 - 5 above. Therefore, the motion
6 should remain under seal for the same reasons articulated above.
7
7.
The requested relief is necessary and narrowly tailored to protect the confidentiality
8 of information contained or discussed in Apple’s Motion to Augment the Record and Exhibit E of
9 the Chung Declaration.
10
11
I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my
12 knowledge.
13
Executed this 22nd day of December, 2011, in Seoul, Korea.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF HANKIL KANG
1
2
GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION
I, Victoria Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the
3 foregoing document. I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the
4 electronic filing of this document has been obtained from Hankil Kang.
5
6
/s/ Victoria Maroulis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF HANKIL KANG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?