Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 542

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction Brief filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Brian Mack in Support of Motion to Seal, #2 Exhibit Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction Brief, #3 Exhibit Declaration of Todd M. Briggs in Support of Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction Brief, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A to Briggs Decl, #5 Exhibit Exhibit B to Briggs Decl, #6 Exhibit Exhibit C to Briggs Decl, #7 Exhibit Exhibit D to Briggs Decl, #8 Exhibit Exhibit E to Briggs Decl, #9 Exhibit Exhibit F to Briggs Decl, #10 Exhibit Exhibit G to Briggs Decl, #11 Exhibit Exhibit H to Briggs Decl, #12 Exhibit Exhibit I to Briggs Decl, #13 Exhibit Exhibit J to Briggs Decl, #14 Exhibit Exhibit K to Briggs Decl, #15 Exhibit Exhibit L to Briggs Decl, #16 Exhibit Exhibit M to Briggs Decl, #17 Exhibit Exhibit N to Briggs Decl, #18 Exhibit Exhibit O to Briggs Decl, #19 Exhibit Exhibit P to Briggs Decl, #20 Exhibit Exhibit Q to Briggs Decl, #21 Exhibit Exhibit R to Briggs Decl, #22 Exhibit Exhibit S to Briggs Decl, #23 Exhibit Exhibit T to Briggs Decl, #24 Exhibit Exhibit U to Briggs Decl, #25 Exhibit Exhibit V to Briggs Decl, #26 Exhibit Exhibt W to Briggs Decl, #27 Exhibit Exhibit X to Briggs Decl, #28 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 2 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 2 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 5 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) 6 kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) 7 victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 8 Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 9 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 10 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) 11 michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor 12 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 13 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 14 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and 15 SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 19 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK 20 Plaintiff, 21 vs. 22 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 23 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 24 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 25 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 26 DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S RESPONSE TO APPLE’S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF Date: January 20, 2012 Time: 10:00 am Place: Courtroom 8, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh Defendant. 27 28 02198.51855/4519824.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S RESPONSE TO APPLE’S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF 1 I, Todd M. Briggs, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner with the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and 3 counsel for defendants and counter-claimants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics 4 America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I 5 submit this declaration in support of Samsung’s Response to Apple’s Opening Claim Construction 6 Brief. I am personally familiar with and knowledgeable about the facts stated in this declaration 7 and if called upon could and would testify competently as to the statements made herein. 8 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 9 6,493,002. 10 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 11 Deposition of Steven Christensen, dated October 26, 2011, and Exhibit 978 to the Deposition of 12 Steven Christensen. 13 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 14 file history of U.S. Patent No. 6,493,002. 15 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 16 5,659,693. 17 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 18 7,469,381. 19 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 20 Deposition of Ravin Balakrishnan, dated August 16, 2011. 21 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Exhibit 104 to the 22 Deposition of Ravin Balakrishnan, dated August 16, 2011. 23 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 24 7,663,607. 25 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 26 Deposition of Brian Q. Huppi, dated October 18, 2011. 27 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 28 Deposition of Joshua Strickon, dated October 20, 2011. 02198.51855/4519824.1 -2- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S RESPONSE TO APPLE’S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF 1 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 2 7,812,828. 3 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 4 file history of U.S. Patent No. 7,812,828. 5 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from 6 the Deposition of Wayne Westerman, dated October 31, 2011. 7 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 8 hearing transcript in the matter of Certain Mobile Device and Related Software, ITC Inv. No. 3379 TA-750, commencing September 23, 2011. 10 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit O is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 11 Pre-Trial Statement and Brief of the Commission Investigative Staff in the matter of Certain 12 Mobile Device and Related Software, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-750, dated September 9, 2011. 13 17. Attached hereto as Exhibit P is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 14 7,844,915. 15 18. Attached hereto as Exhibit Q is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 16 7,853,891. 17 19. Attached hereto as Exhibit R is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 18 file history of U.S. Patent No. 7,853,891. 19 20. Attached hereto as Exhibit S is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 20 Deposition of Imran Chaudhri, dated October 14, 2011. 21 21. Attached hereto as Exhibit T is a true and correct copy of screenshots from the 22 iPhone “Clock” program. 23 22. Attached hereto as Exhibit U is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Infringement 24 Chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,853,891 (Exhibit 8) for the Samsung Galaxy Prevail Mobile Phone. 25 23. Attached hereto as Exhibit V is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Infringement 26 Chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,853,891 (Exhibit 9) for the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1. 27 24. Attached hereto as Exhibit W is a true and correct copy of U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 28 2003/0016253. 02198.51855/4519824.1 -3- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S RESPONSE TO APPLE’S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF 1 25. Attached hereto as Exhibit X is a true and correct copy of certain excerpts from the 2 file history of U.S. Patent No. 7,853,891. 3 I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the 4 foregoing is true and correct. 5 6 DATED: December 22, 2011 7 8 9 10 11 12 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By /s/ Todd M. Briggs Todd M. Briggs Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4519824.1 -4- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF TODD M. BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S RESPONSE TO APPLE’S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?