Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 799

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 [Redacted Public Version] Apple's Combined Reply, #3 Proposed Order, #4 [Redacted Public Version] Declaration of Mia Mazza in Support of Apple's Combined Reply, #5 Exhibit 1 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza, #6 Exhibit 2 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza, #7 Exhibit 3 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza, #8 Exhibit 4 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza, #9 Exhibit 33 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 3/12/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit 33 755 PAGE MILL ROAD PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA 94304-1018 TELEPHONE: 650.813.5600 FACSIMILE: 650.494.0792 WWW.MOFO.COM February 27, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP NEW YORK, SAN FRANCISCO, LOS ANGELES, PALO ALTO, SACRAMENTO, SAN DIEGO, DENVER, NORTHERN VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON, D.C. TOKYO, LONDON, BRUSSELS, BEIJING, SHANGHAI, HONG KONG Writer’s Direct Contact 650.813.5718 MPernick@mofo.com Via E-Mail (rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com) Rachel Herrick Kassabian Quinn Emanuel 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Re: Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (N.D. Cal.) Dear Rachel: We write to ensure that Heon-Seok Lee is prepared to testify about his designated Topics 710 and 25-34 from Apple’s 6th Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice. To be clear, Apple is not by this letter restricting itself in terms of the questions it will ask or subjects it will cover in Mr. Lee’s deposition. Apple’s intent here is to put Samsung on clear notice of the sort of information Apple will seek from Mr. Lee so that Samsung can make sure that Mr. Lee is prepared for his deposition. As particular examples that are not meant to be exhaustive, here are some of the areas Apple intends to address with Mr. Lee: • Identification of the touchscreen controller chip and firmware used for each device accused of infringing Apple’s patents-in-suit. • Identification and explanation of the role and interaction of Samsung’s source code with the touchscreen controller module. • Identification of where Samsung manufactures and tests the full functioning capability of each device accused of infringing and as to the subject matter of Apple’s patents-in-suit. I also again point out that Samsung withdrew Mr. Lee as its corporate designee on Topics 11-12 from Apple's 6th Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice. Apple repeats its request that Samsung designate a witness on these topics. Please get back to us immediately on this. pa-1514508 Rachel Herrick Kassabian February 27, 2012 Page Two Sincerely, /s/ Marc J. Pernick Marc J. Pernick cc: Peter Kolovos S. Calvin Walden pa-1514508

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?