Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 807

DECLARATION of Mia Mazza in Support of #805 Opposition to Administrative Motion for Temporary Relief from the Lead Counsel Meet and Confer Requirement or Alternatively for an Extension of the Deadline to File Motions to Compel, filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N)(Related document(s) #805 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 3/13/2012) Modified text on 3/14/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Exhibit K 755 PAGE MILL ROAD PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA 94304-1018 TELEPHONE: 650.813.5600 FACSIMILE: 650.494.0792 WWW.MOFO.COM March 13, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP NEW YORK, SAN FRANCISCO, LOS ANGELES, PALO ALTO, SACRAMENTO, SAN DIEGO, DENVER, NORTHERN VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON, D.C. TOKYO, LONDON, BRUSSELS, BEIJING, SHANGHAI, HONG KONG Writer’s Direct Contact 650.813.5718 MPernick@mofo.com By Email (rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com) Rachel Herrick Kassabian Quinn Emanuel 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Re: Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.) Dear Rachel: Following up on the correspondence that you have received from us, I set forth below Apple’s agenda for the March 14, 2012 lead counsel meet-and-confer session. 1. Apple’s 6th Set of RFAs (Document Authentication/Admissibility) and Stipulation on Authenticity 2. Designations for Apple’s 11th Rule 30(b)(6) Notice (Authentication of Documents) 3. Deficient Responses to Apple Interrogatories re: Copying, Design Patent Infringement, Damages and Affirmative Defenses 4. Samsung’s Incomplete Production of Technical Documents/Materials re: Apple’s Patents 5. Deficient Responses to Apple’s Interrogatory Responses re: Utility Patent Issues 6. Samsung’s Incomplete Production of Damages-Related Documents 7. Samsung’s Deficient Financial Spreadsheets 8. Samsung’s Witness Designations for Apple’s 7th and 10th Rule 30(b)(6) Notices 9. Samsung’s Production of Documents in Compliance with Court’s Orders 10. Samsung’s Incomplete Production of Documents Discussing This Litigation/ITC Case pa-1517353 Rachel Herrick Kassabian March 13, 2012 Page Two 11. HumanCentric Documents 12. Samsung’s Clawback of Documents Purportedly Based on “Unreleased Products” Without Producing Redacted Versions 13. Samsung’s Overbroad and Untimely Discovery Requests and Request for Additional Depositions (including Apex Depositions) 14. Samsung’s Apparent Spoliation of Documents During Pendency of Litigation Sincerely, /s/ Marc Pernick Marc Pernick cc: S. Calvin Walden Peter Kolovos pa-1517353

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?