Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
807
DECLARATION of Mia Mazza in Support of #805 Opposition to Administrative Motion for Temporary Relief from the Lead Counsel Meet and Confer Requirement or Alternatively for an Extension of the Deadline to File Motions to Compel, filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N)(Related document(s) #805 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 3/13/2012) Modified text on 3/14/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
Exhibit K
755 PAGE MILL ROAD
PALO ALTO
CALIFORNIA 94304-1018
TELEPHONE: 650.813.5600
FACSIMILE: 650.494.0792
WWW.MOFO.COM
March 13, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
NEW YORK, SAN FRANCISCO,
LOS ANGELES, PALO ALTO,
SACRAMENTO, SAN DIEGO,
DENVER, NORTHERN VIRGINIA,
WASHINGTON, D.C.
TOKYO, LONDON, BRUSSELS,
BEIJING, SHANGHAI, HONG KONG
Writer’s Direct Contact
650.813.5718
MPernick@mofo.com
By Email (rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com)
Rachel Herrick Kassabian
Quinn Emanuel
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Re:
Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Rachel:
Following up on the correspondence that you have received from us, I set forth below
Apple’s agenda for the March 14, 2012 lead counsel meet-and-confer session.
1. Apple’s 6th Set of RFAs (Document Authentication/Admissibility) and Stipulation on
Authenticity
2. Designations for Apple’s 11th Rule 30(b)(6) Notice (Authentication of Documents)
3. Deficient Responses to Apple Interrogatories re: Copying, Design Patent
Infringement, Damages and Affirmative Defenses
4. Samsung’s Incomplete Production of Technical Documents/Materials re: Apple’s
Patents
5. Deficient Responses to Apple’s Interrogatory Responses re: Utility Patent Issues
6. Samsung’s Incomplete Production of Damages-Related Documents
7. Samsung’s Deficient Financial Spreadsheets
8. Samsung’s Witness Designations for Apple’s 7th and 10th Rule 30(b)(6) Notices
9. Samsung’s Production of Documents in Compliance with Court’s Orders
10. Samsung’s Incomplete Production of Documents Discussing This Litigation/ITC
Case
pa-1517353
Rachel Herrick Kassabian
March 13, 2012
Page Two
11. HumanCentric Documents
12. Samsung’s Clawback of Documents Purportedly Based on “Unreleased Products”
Without Producing Redacted Versions
13. Samsung’s Overbroad and Untimely Discovery Requests and Request for Additional
Depositions (including Apex Depositions)
14. Samsung’s Apparent Spoliation of Documents During Pendency of Litigation
Sincerely,
/s/ Marc Pernick
Marc Pernick
cc:
S. Calvin Walden
Peter Kolovos
pa-1517353
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?