Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 930

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Summary Judgment, #2 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment, #3 Trac Declaration in Support to Motion to File Under Seal, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to File Under Seal)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/17/2012) Modified on 5/21/2012 attachment #3 Declaration Sealed pursuant to General Order No. 62 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1














LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC. and SAMSUNG
 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION





APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,




vs.

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,


Defendant.



02198.51855/4765762.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

THE COURT, having considered Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (the

 “Motion”), the papers submitted by the parties and argument by counsel, HEREBY ORDERS that
 Samsung is entitled to judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 as to the following:


1.

Samsung’s Second Affirmative Defense (Patent Non-Infringement), as to

 U.S. Patent 7,844,915, claim 8.


2.

Samsung’s Third Affirmative Defense (Patent Invalidity), as to U.S. Patents

 D618,677 (Invalid as Obvious); D593,087 (Invalid as Obvious); D504,889 (Invalid as Obvious);
 D604,305 (Anticipated and Invalid as Obvious); D617,334 (Anticipated, Invalid as Obvious, and
 Invalid Due to the On-Sale Bar); 7,864,163, claim 50 (Anticipated); 7,469,381, claim 19
 (Anticipated); and 7,663,607, claim 8 (Anticipated and Invalid as Obvious).


3.

Samsung’s Fifth Affirmative Defense (Functionality), as to Apple’s asserted

4.

Apple’s claims for damages under its Twenty-Eighth and Twenty-Ninth

 trade dresses.


 Counterclaims (Sherman Act and Unfair Competition Law).



IT IS SO ORDERED.





DATED:
HON. LUCY H. KOH










02198.51855/4765762.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK