Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 930

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Summary Judgment, #2 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment, #3 Trac Declaration in Support to Motion to File Under Seal, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to File Under Seal)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/17/2012) Modified on 5/21/2012 attachment #3 Declaration Sealed pursuant to General Order No. 62 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL

Defendants.

19
20
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
21
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung's Motion to
22
Exclude Opinions of Certain of Apple's Experts.
23
Samsung has filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 79-5 and General Order No.
24
62 to provide evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal.

Apple has filed

25
the supporting declarations to provide evidence of the same.

The declarations establishes that the

26
below documents contain information that has been designated by the parties as HIGHLY
27
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
28
02198.51855/4765863.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following documents

2 shall be filed under seal:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(“the Motion”);
2. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Brett Arnold in Support
of the Motion;
3. Exhibits 1-3, 14-18, 21, 27, 37-53, 55-61, 63-69, and 71-80 to the Declaration of
Brett Arnold in Support of the Motion;
4. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Andries van Dam in
Support of the Motion;
5. Exhibits 2, 3 and 4 to the Declaration of Andries van Dam in Support of the
Motion;
6. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Clifton Forlines in
Support of the Motion;
7. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Brian von Herzen in
Support of the Motion;
8. Exhibits 9, 10, 16, and 18-20 to the Declaration of Brian von Herzen in Support of
the Motion;
9. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Stephen Gray in Support
of the Motion;
10. Exhibits 3, 6-15, and 17 to the Declaration of Stephen Gray in Support of the
Motion.

23
24
25
26
27
28

02198.51855/4765863.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3 DATED:

______________, 2012

4
5
6

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

02198.51855/4765863.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-3[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL