Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 968

MOTION for Sanctions filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). Motion Hearing set for 6/26/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal. Responses due by 6/5/2012. Replies due by 6/12/2012. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in Support of Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions, #2 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 3 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 4 5 CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG Plaintiff, vs. 6 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG 7 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG 8 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 9 Defendants. 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR RULE 37 SANCTIONS FOR APPLE’S VIOLATION OF DECEMBER 22, 2011 COURT ORDER Date: June 26, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 5, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Paul S. Grewal 11 12 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung 13 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed a Motion for Rule 37 14 Sanctions for Apple’s Violation of December 22, 2011 Court Order. 15 For good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the requested relief set forth in the Notice 16 of Motion to Samsung’s Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 DATED: May ___, 2011 21 22 23 Honorable Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?