Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 978

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Samsung's Motion For Leave To Seek Reconsideration of the Court's May 21, 2012 Order, #2 Declaration of Thomas Watson, #3 Exhibit 4, #4 Exhibit 17, #5 Exhibit 18, #6 Exhibit 19, #7 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for Leave, #8 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com  555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS  AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION  APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.     02198.51855/4776981.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Defendants Samsung 2 Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications 3 America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby bring this administrative motion for an order to 4 seal the following: 5 6 7 8 9 10 1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration of the Court’s May 21, 2012 (“the Motion”); 2. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Thomas Watson in Support of the Motion (“Watson Declaration”); and 3. Exhibits 1-16 to the Watson Declaration. In short, the above documents discuss, refer to, or comprise excerpts of documents that has 11 been designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY under the 12 Protective Order. This Administrative Motion is supported by Declaration of Hankil Kang In 13 Support of Samsung’s Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal. For those 14 documents designated as confidential by Apple, Samsung expects Apple will file a declaration 15 under Local Rule 79-5(d) establishing good cause for filing these documents under seal. 16 Pursuant to General Order No. 62, Samsung’s entire filing will be lodged with the Court 17 for in camera review and served on all parties. A proposed redacted version of Samsung’s 18 Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration has been filed concurrently with this motion. 19 DATED: May 25, 2012 20 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 By /s/ Victoria Maroulis Charles K. Verhoeven Kevin P.B. Johnson Victoria F. Maroulis Michael T. Zeller Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 28 02198.51855/4776981.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?