Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
999
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal, #2 Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts, #3 Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of Samsung's Opposition, #4 Exhibit A to the Martin Declaration, #5 Exhibit B to the Martin Declaration, #6 Exhibit C to the Martin Declaration, #7 Exhibit D to the Martin Declaration, #8 Exhibit E to the Martin Declaration, #9 Exhibit F to the Martin Declaration, #10 Exhibit G to the Martin Declaration, #11 Exhibit H to the Martin Declaration, #12 Exhibit I to the Martin Declaration, #13 Exhibit J to the Martin Declaration, #14 Exhibit K to the Martin Declaration, #15 Exhibit L to the Martin Declaration, #16 Exhibit M to the Martin Declaration, #17 Exhibit N to the Martin Declaration, #18 Exhibit O to the Martin Declaration, #19 Exhibit P to the Martin Declaration, #20 Exhibit Q to the Martin Declaration, #21 Exhibit R to the Martin Declaration, #22 Exhibit S to the Martin Declaration, #23 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/31/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL
Defendants.
19
20
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
21
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung's
22
Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, in connection with Samsung's Opposition
23
to Apple Inc.’s (Apple’s) Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung’s Experts and Samsung’s
24
Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung’s Expert Reports.
25
Samsung and Apple have filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 79-5 and General
26
Order No. 62 to provide evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal.
The
27
28
02198.51855/4785255.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1 declaration establishes that the below documents contain information that has been designated by
2 Samsung as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
3
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following documents
4 shall be filed under seal:
5
1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to
6
Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts;
7
2. Exhibits D -G, I, N, O and Q to the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of the
8
Opposition to Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts;
9
3. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to
10
Strike Portions of Samsung's Expert Reports;
11
4. Exhibits B - D, G - M, P, Q, S - U, X, Y, BB, DD - FF to the Declaration of James
12
Ward in Support of the Opposition to Apple's Motion to Strike Portions of
13
Samsung's Expert Reports ("Ward Declaration"); and
14
5. Exhibits 1, 3-9, 12-17 and 20 to the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of the
15
Opposition to Apple's Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung's Expert Reports.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19 DATED:
____________, 2012
20
21
22
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4785255.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?