Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 999

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal, #2 Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts, #3 Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of Samsung's Opposition, #4 Exhibit A to the Martin Declaration, #5 Exhibit B to the Martin Declaration, #6 Exhibit C to the Martin Declaration, #7 Exhibit D to the Martin Declaration, #8 Exhibit E to the Martin Declaration, #9 Exhibit F to the Martin Declaration, #10 Exhibit G to the Martin Declaration, #11 Exhibit H to the Martin Declaration, #12 Exhibit I to the Martin Declaration, #13 Exhibit J to the Martin Declaration, #14 Exhibit K to the Martin Declaration, #15 Exhibit L to the Martin Declaration, #16 Exhibit M to the Martin Declaration, #17 Exhibit N to the Martin Declaration, #18 Exhibit O to the Martin Declaration, #19 Exhibit P to the Martin Declaration, #20 Exhibit Q to the Martin Declaration, #21 Exhibit R to the Martin Declaration, #22 Exhibit S to the Martin Declaration, #23 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/31/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 [PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. 19 20 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung 21 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung's 22 Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, in connection with Samsung's Opposition 23 to Apple Inc.’s (Apple’s) Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung’s Experts and Samsung’s 24 Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung’s Expert Reports. 25 Samsung and Apple have filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 79-5 and General 26 Order No. 62 to provide evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal. The 27 28 02198.51855/4785255.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 declaration establishes that the below documents contain information that has been designated by 2 Samsung as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 3 Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following documents 4 shall be filed under seal: 5 1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to 6 Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts; 7 2. Exhibits D -G, I, N, O and Q to the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of the 8 Opposition to Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts; 9 3. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to 10 Strike Portions of Samsung's Expert Reports; 11 4. Exhibits B - D, G - M, P, Q, S - U, X, Y, BB, DD - FF to the Declaration of James 12 Ward in Support of the Opposition to Apple's Motion to Strike Portions of 13 Samsung's Expert Reports ("Ward Declaration"); and 14 5. Exhibits 1, 3-9, 12-17 and 20 to the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of the 15 Opposition to Apple's Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung's Expert Reports. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 DATED: ____________, 2012 20 21 22 Hon. Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4785255.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?