Realtek Semiconductor Corporation v. LSI Corporation et al

Filing 265

ORDER re Voir Dire. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/7/14. (Attachments: # 1 Prospective Juror Questionnaire)(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR, CORPORATION, 13 Case No. C-12-3451-RMW Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 ORDER RE VOIR DIRE LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE SYSTEMS LLC, 16 17 [Re: Dkt. No. 250] Defendants. 18 19 The court appreciates the work the parties put into the Amended Joint Proposed Voir Dire 20 questions and the court anticipates asking most, if not all, of the questions proposed. The court has 21 separated out those questions that are most likely to raise a valid excuse from jury service or a basis 22 for a cause challenge and put them in a written questionnaire. The jurors are being summoned for 23 10:00 a.m. on Monday, February 10 and will be given the questionnaire. After the questionnaires 24 are completed, copies will be made available to the parties for use during the selection process 25 commencing at 1:30 p.m. The written hardship claims and any answers which raise an obvious basis 26 for a cause challenge will be reviewed and in most cases ruled on based upon the answers given so 27 that most of the prospective jurors who are brought into the courtroom will be eligible to serve. A 28 copy of the written questionnaire is attached. ORDER RE VOIR DIRE Case No. C-12-3451-RMW RDS -1- 1 2 Dated: February 7, 2014 _________________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE VOIR DIRE Case No. C-12-3451-RMW RDS -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?