Realtek Semiconductor Corporation v. LSI Corporation et al
Filing
265
ORDER re Voir Dire. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/7/14. (Attachments: # 1 Prospective Juror Questionnaire)(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR,
CORPORATION,
13
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
ORDER RE VOIR DIRE
LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE
SYSTEMS LLC,
16
17
[Re: Dkt. No. 250]
Defendants.
18
19
The court appreciates the work the parties put into the Amended Joint Proposed Voir Dire
20
questions and the court anticipates asking most, if not all, of the questions proposed. The court has
21
separated out those questions that are most likely to raise a valid excuse from jury service or a basis
22
for a cause challenge and put them in a written questionnaire. The jurors are being summoned for
23
10:00 a.m. on Monday, February 10 and will be given the questionnaire. After the questionnaires
24
are completed, copies will be made available to the parties for use during the selection process
25
commencing at 1:30 p.m. The written hardship claims and any answers which raise an obvious basis
26
for a cause challenge will be reviewed and in most cases ruled on based upon the answers given so
27
that most of the prospective jurors who are brought into the courtroom will be eligible to serve. A
28
copy of the written questionnaire is attached.
ORDER RE VOIR DIRE
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
RDS
-1-
1
2
Dated: February 7, 2014
_________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE VOIR DIRE
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
RDS
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?