Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al

Filing 67

MOTION to Transfer Case or, in the Alternative to Stay filed by MobileStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP. Motion Hearing set for 6/26/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Responses due by 5/23/2014. Replies due by 5/30/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Joshua Budwin, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28, # 30 Exhibit 29, # 31 Exhibit 30, # 32 Exhibit 31, # 33 Exhibit 32, # 34 Exhibit 33, # 35 Exhibit 34, # 36 Exhibit 35, # 37 Declaration of William Colvin, # 38 Declaration of Brian Egan, # 39 Declaration of Erik Fako, # 40 Declaration of Mark Hearn, # 41 Declaration of Gillian Mccolgan, # 42 Declaration of Matthew Poisson, # 43 Declaration of Donald Powers, # 44 Declaration of Marilyn French-St. George, # 45 Declaration of John Veschi, # 46 Declaration of Bruce Anthony Wootton, # 47 Proposed Order)(Budwin, Joshua) (Filed on 5/9/2014)

EXHIBIT 15

Case 2:13-cv-00894-JRG Document 31 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 187

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION

ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP ET AL,
Plaintiff,
v.
ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC., ET AL
HTC CORPORATION ET AL
LG ELECTRONICS INC. ET AL
PANTECH CO LTD ET AL
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ET AL
ZTE CORPORATION ET AL

§
§
§
§
§
§
§ CASE NO. 2:13-CV-894
§
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-895
§
§ CASE NO. 2:13-CV-898 
§ CASE NO. 2:13-CV-899
§ CASE NO. 2:13-CV-900
§ CASE NO. 2:13-CV-901

ORDER
The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all
pretrial issues (except venue) with the LEAD CASE, Cause No. 2:13-cv-894. All parties are
instructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the LEAD CASE. Individual
cases remain active for venue determinations and trial. The Court will enter one docket control
order, one protective order, and one discovery order that will govern the entire consolidated case.
If a docket control order, protective order, discovery order, and/or appointment of
mediator has been entered in the lead case at the time new member cases are added to the
consolidated action, all parties are directed to meet and confer in order to determine whether
amendments to such documents are necessary. Any proposed amendments to the docket control
order, protective order, discovery order, or appointment of a mediator shall be filed within two
weeks of this Order.
1 

Case 2:13-cv-00894-JRG Document 31 Filed 03/20/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 188

The local rules’ page limitations for Markman briefs and other motions will apply to the
consolidated case. To further promote judicial economy and to conserve the parties’ resources,
the Court encourages the parties to file a notice with the Court in the event that there are other
related cases currently pending on the Court’s docket that may also be appropriate for
consolidation with this case.
.
The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated defendants into the Lead Case and their

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of
Appearance in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead
consolidated action. Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a
Notice of Appearance in the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac
vice in the Lead Case.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of March, 2014.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2