Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al
RESPONSE (re 67 MOTION to Transfer Case or, in the Alternative to Stay ) Opposition of Google Inc. to Rockstar's Renewed Motion to Transfer or Stay This Action filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Kristin J. Madigan, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18)(Warren, Matthew) (Filed on 5/23/2014)
Case 2:13-cv-00900-JRG Document 61-7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 3471
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP and
MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
LLC, and GOOGLE, INC.,
§ Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00900-JRG
§ JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
DECLARATION OF DONALD POWERS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS ROCKSTAR
CONSORTIUM US LP AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S RESPONSE IN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER
Case 2:13-cv-00900-JRG Document 61-7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 3472
DECLARATION OF DONALD POWERS
I, Donald Powers, declare as follows:
I have been a member in good standing of the State Bar of Texas since 1986 and
am Litigation Counsel for Rockstar Consortium US LP (“Rockstar”). I submit this declaration in
support of Rockstar’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Transfer, which is filed
herewith in the cases Rockstar Consortium US LP, et al v. ASUSTek Computer, Inc., et al, Case
No. 2:13-cv-00894-JRG; Rockstar Consortium US LP, et al v. HTC Corp., et al, Case No. 2:13cv-00895-JRG; Rockstar Consortium US LP, et al v. LG Electronics Inc., et al, Case No. 2:13cv-00898-JRG; Rockstar Consortium US LP, et al v. Pantech Co., Ltd., et al, Case No. 2:13-cv00899-JRG; Rockstar Consortium US LP, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, Case No.
2:13-cv-00900-JRG; and Rockstar Consortium US LP, et al v. ZTE Corp., et al, Case No. 2:13cv-00901-JRG.
Prior to my employment with Rockstar, I worked for Nortel for over 13 years as
Senior Counsel in the Richardson, Texas, office. I began my employment with Nortel on
February 2, 1998, and left the company in April 2011. I joined Rockstar in January 2012.
Based on my previous employment with Nortel and present employment with
Rockstar, I have relevant knowledge regarding the instant suits, including knowledge of Nortel’s
corporate organization and structure, Rockstar’s corporate organization and structure, documents
investigated for purposes of this suit and locations of relevant documents and witnesses, and
parties with first-hand knowledge about the patents-in-suit and activities related to those patents.
I make this declaration based upon my own personal knowledge unless otherwise indicated
herein, and if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto.
Case 2:13-cv-00900-JRG Document 61-7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 3473
I currently reside in Richardson, Texas, in the Eastern District of Texas, where I
have lived for 17 years.
Rockstar and MobileStar Technologies LLC (“MobileStar”) are the assignee and
the exclusive licensee, respectively, of the patents-in-suit, which were previously held by Nortel.
Rockstar owns two of the patents-in-suit and previously owned the others, before assigning them
Rockstar is a Delaware limited partnership. Rockstar Consortium Inc. is a British
Columbia (Canadian) corporation with its office in Ottawa. The two companies are separate
MobileStar is a subsidiary of Rockstar. MobileStar is based in Plano, Texas.
At the time Nortel filed for bankruptcy, its international headquarters was located
in Ontario, Canada, and Nortel’s United States headquarters was located at 2221 Lakeside
Boulevard in Richardson, Texas—less than one mile from the border of the Eastern District of
Texas. This location was referred to as the Lakeside campus. On information and belief, the
Lakeside campus was built in 1991 and encompassed over 800,000 square feet of office space,
including two office buildings. At its peak around the year 2000, a little fewer than 10,000
employees worked for Nortel in the Dallas area, many of whom lived in the Eastern District of
In January 2009, at the time Nortel declared bankruptcy, over 2,000 employees
worked at Nortel’s office in Richardson, Texas.
The equity owners of Rockstar are Apple Incorporated (“Apple”), BlackBerry
Corporation (“BlackBerry”), Ericsson Incorporated (“Ericsson”), Microsoft Corporation
(“Microsoft”) and Sony IPLA Holdings Inc. (“Sony”).
Case 2:13-cv-00900-JRG Document 61-7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 3474
BlackBerry’s United States headquarters is in Irving, Texas. Ericsson’s United
States headquarters is in Plano, Texas, within the Eastern District of Texas.
Microsoft is headquartered in Redmond, Washington.
Apple is headquartered in Cupertino, California.
Sony’s United States headquarters is in New York City, New York.
intellectual property operations are run from offices in New Jersey.
Rockstar’s equity owners do not direct or control Rockstar’s licensing efforts.
I understand that Lazard in New York and Global IP Law Group in Chicago
advised Nortel in the auction process.
The lead Lazard employee working on the Nortel
intellectual property deal was David Descoteaux, who still works for Lazard in New York.
Other advisory team members were Justin Lux, who now works for Portfolio Advisors in the
New York City area; Colin Keenan, who now works for Brightwood Capital Advisors in New
York City; Edouard Gueyffier, who now lives in the United Kingdom and works for Estin & Co.;
and Kshitij Bhatia, who now lives in India and works for Warburg Pincus.
The United States Nortel representative is now in New York and the Canadian
Nortel representative is in Ontario.
Rockstar Bidco LP, a separate entity from Rockstar, having separate management,
is also based in New York.
When the sale of the patents-in-suit closed in 2011, many of the former Nortel
employees who worked in the IP group were hired by Rockstar. Several of Nortel’s Canadian
employees involved in intellectual property were hired by a Canadian entity, Rockstar
Consortium Inc., which was created as a vehicle to hire those former Nortel employees. The
Case 2:13-cv-00900-JRG Document 61-7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 3475
Canadian entity entered into a services agreement to provide various intellectual-propertysupport services to Rockstar.
Rockstar originally conducted operations out of a portion of the former Nortel
complex at the Lakeside campus that used to house the Nortel IP group. The company upgraded
its facilities in August 2012 when it signed a 7-year lease at its current offices at Legacy Town
Center in Plano, Texas, a short drive away from the Lakeside campus. In December 2012,
Rockstar finished the build-out of the new Plano, Texas, office and completed its move to the
new facilities, which are located in the Eastern District of Texas.
Rockstar’s current offices are far more attractive and suitable than the former
location, and Rockstar selected them to serve as a fully functional headquarters facility that
would attract high-quality employees. The office contains 8,125 square feet with 10 assigned
offices, two guest offices, seven work areas, and four conference rooms, in addition to storage
Rockstar has 15 full-time employees; five employees work full-time from the
Plano, Texas, office, while the others spend significant time there.
Rockstar’s Plano, Texas, office is the only office for the company, although some
employees work out of their homes in addition to working from offices in the Plano, Texas,
facilities. From the Plano, Texas, office, Rockstar employees engage in substantial licensing and
litigation support work. Additionally, Rockstar’s regular board meetings are held at the Plano,
Texas, office. Rockstar’s annual strategy sessions, requiring the attendance of many Rockstar
employees, including all of Rockstar and Rockstar Consortium Inc.’s management, are also
conducted in Plano, Texas.
Case 2:13-cv-00900-JRG Document 61-7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 3476
Rockstar routinely sends licensing correspondence and executes contracts,
including Non-Disclosure Agreements, from its Plano, Texas, office. When Rockstar initially
formed, for a transitional period of time Rockstar would send licensing correspondence using
Rockstar Consortium Inc.’s Ottawa address. Since Rockstar re-located to its current Plano,
Texas, location, it has sent licensing correspondence and entered into agreements from its Plano,
Texas, office. For example, since March 2012, Rockstar employees have signed non-disclosure
and other agreements with a number of companies from its Plano, Texas, offices.
No employees of Rockstar live in California.
Of the eight Rockstar employees who likely have relevant information about this
suit, three work full-time in the Plano office, one lives in Pennsylvania (John Veschi), one lives
in Colorado (Chad Hilyard), one currently lives in North Carolina (Erik Fako), one lives in
Massachusetts (Bruce Schofield), and one currently lives in Florida (Gillian McColgan). The
three full-time employees in Plano who likely have relevant knowledge about this suit are
myself, Mark Hearn, and Bernard Tiegerman. Mr. Tiegerman has lived in the Eastern District of
Texas since 2000, when he started working for Nortel’s Richardson, Texas office. With the
exception of Mr. Hilyard, all of us formerly were employed by Nortel. I understand that Mr.
Hearn has submitted his own declaration discussing his knowledge of facts and circumstances
relevant to this suit. The additional five employees (Ms. McColgan, Mr. Veschi, Mr. Hilyard,
Mr. Schofield and Mr. Tiegerman) all have relevant information related to infringement,
damages and monetization, including possible licensing or sale, of the patents-in-suit. At least
Messrs. Veschi and Hilyard also have relevant knowledge regarding Google’s knowledge of the
Case 2:13-cv-00900-JRG Document 61-7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 3477
Kasim Alfalahi, a Rockstar Board member and Chief IP officer at Ericsson, works
at Ericsson, very close to Rockstar’s Plano, Texas, office.
Randy Mishler, another Rockstar Board member and Senior Director of IP
Licensing at BlackBerry, works in nearby Irving, Texas. Mr. Mishler is also a former Nortel
Rockstar’s Plano, Texas, office contains hard drives from former Nortel and
former Rockstar employees as well as boxes of hard copy documents pertaining to Nortel’s
licensing of the patents-in-suit, notes related to prior licensing meetings regarding the patents-insuit, and internal patent prosecution files for the patents-in-suit. Additionally, the Plano office is
equipped to access all electronic records at Rockstar Consortium Inc.’s Canada location.
Rockstar Consortium Inc. employs 21 employees in Canada – 19 in its office in
Ottawa and two in Toronto. Certain of these employees routinely travel for work to Plano.
Approximately four of these employees have relevant information about the lawsuit.
significantly easier for these employees to travel from Ontario to the Eastern District of Texas
than it is for them to travel to the Northern District of California, because the employees have
support facilities in Texas and they are familiar with the Eastern District of Texas region by
virtue of their routine travel there.
Willing third-party witnesses in this suit include former Nortel employees, and
five named inventors of the patents-in-suit. The former Nortel employees include: Art Fisher,
who was Nortel’s Vice President of Intellectual Property Law from 1998-2004 and who
currently resides in the Dallas area; and Richard Weiss, former Deputy Intellectual Property
Counsel for Nortel, who currently resides in the Eastern District of Texas. Mr. Fisher and Mr.
Weiss possess knowledge related to Nortel’s licensing practices and policies during the years of
Case 2:13-cv-00900-JRG Document 61-7 Filed 04/14/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 3478
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?